Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Irfan Ka Concept (Official) 🎓

Channel

Irfan Ka Concept (Official) 🎓

@irfankaconcept

Not marked by Telegram, checked 15 August 2026

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

13,360subscribers

-150 since we began measuring on 14 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002227140799
TypeChannel
Username@irfankaconcept
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded14 August 2026
Last confirmed live25 September 2026
Measurements held25
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 25 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/irfankaconcept

Topic

Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 96% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

13,36013,54213,45114 August 2026 — 13,510 subscribers15 August 2026 — 13,517 subscribers17 August 2026 — 13,519 subscribers18 August 2026 — 13,538 subscribers19 August 2026 — 13,537 subscribers20 August 2026 — 13,542 subscribers21 August 2026 — 13,535 subscribers22 August 2026 — 13,537 subscribers24 August 2026 — 13,527 subscribers25 August 2026 — 13,517 subscribers26 August 2026 — 13,514 subscribers27 August 2026 — 13,510 subscribers28 August 2026 — 13,504 subscribers30 August 2026 — 13,492 subscribers1 September 2026 — 13,490 subscribers2 September 2026 — 13,485 subscribers3 September 2026 — 13,478 subscribers5 September 2026 — 13,471 subscribers8 September 2026 — 13,443 subscribers11 September 2026 — 13,426 subscribers13 September 2026 — 13,409 subscribers14 September 2026 — 13,392 subscribers16 September 2026 — 13,376 subscribers18 September 2026 — 13,361 subscribers25 September 2026 — 13,360 subscribers14 August 202625 September 2026
25 measurements spanning 42 days, net -150. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 13,333–13,569 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 25
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
25 Sept 2026, 09:1713,360-1
18 Sept 2026, 22:4013,361-15
16 Sept 2026, 11:3713,376-16
14 Sept 2026, 15:2013,392-17
13 Sept 2026, 01:3713,409-17
11 Sept 2026, 04:5913,426-17
8 Sept 2026, 08:5913,443-28
5 Sept 2026, 05:2113,471-7
3 Sept 2026, 09:4313,478-7
2 Sept 2026, 01:5413,485-5
1 Sept 2026, 00:1813,490-2
30 Aug 2026, 21:0413,492-12
28 Aug 2026, 19:1613,504-6
27 Aug 2026, 18:5513,510-4
26 Aug 2026, 16:3413,514-3
25 Aug 2026, 18:0813,517-10
24 Aug 2026, 15:2513,527-10
22 Aug 2026, 21:5413,537+2
21 Aug 2026, 08:4713,535-7
20 Aug 2026, 09:4213,542first reading

Engagement

92 posts held, back to 12 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 35 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
12.4%
avg views ÷ 13,360 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,650
9 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.566%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
9
of 92 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 1 September 2026
Posts held92 (12 August 2026 – 1 September 2026)
Views total14,850
Reactions total84
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken2 Sept 2026, 20:08 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
18s
Average length
18s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

1,034 reactions across 92 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 84.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤87484.5%
👍504.84%
🔥454.35%
😱242.32%
⚡90.87%
✍90.87%
🤣60.58%
🤯60.58%
💔40.387%
🗿30.29%
🌚20.193%
😢20.193%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 92 of the 92 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,034 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 92 most recent posts we hold, published 12 August 2026 to 1 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

1 Sept 2026, 14:29 UTC≈1,010 views6 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Poll

CGL EXPECTED TYPE 🔥 🔥 The extraordinary powers granted under Article 142 are primarily:

  1. ​Supplemental in nature17%
  2. Absolute and unlimited by statute41%
  3. Restricted only to criminal trials14%
  4. ​Exclusive to the Prime Minister's office28%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

❤3🔥3

1 Sept 2026, 14:23 UTC≈1,070 views8 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

The Supreme Court has quashed all FIRs registered against NEET protesters, after which CJP has postponed its proposed march in Delhi on September 5th. @irfankaconcept ❤️

❤8

1 Sept 2026, 04:08 UTC≈1,570 views6 reactionsread 2 September 2026
File

SSC LATEST UPDATE 🤯 🔥 🔔 Important Notice-revised dates for Stenographer Grade 'C' & 'D' Examination, 2026 @irfankaconcept ❤️

❤6

30 Aug 2026, 12:19 UTC≈1,840 views11 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Poll

Choose the Correct sequence.

  1. ​B - C - A - D35%
  2. ​B - A - C - D34%
  3. ​A - B - C - D12%
  4. ​B - D - A - C19%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

❤8🔥2⚡1

30 Aug 2026, 12:18 UTC≈1,790 views2 reactionsread 2 September 2026

CGL SPECIAL | PARA JUMBLE ❤️ ​A: The train slowly pulled away from the bustling platform. ​B: Amit breathed a sigh of relief as he finally secured his window seat. ​C: He waved goodbye to his family through the dusty glass pane. ​D: An exciting solo journey across the country was about to begin.

❤2

30 Aug 2026, 03:15 UTC≈1,880 views13 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Poll

CGL MAINS SPECIAL 🔥🔥 The dog's ears perked up as it .......... the faint sound of its owner's footsteps.

  1. ascertained26%
  2. deciphered39%
  3. surmised13%
  4. discerned22%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

❤10👍3

29 Aug 2026, 05:18 UTC≈1,980 views11 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Poll

CGL MOST OST EXPECTED 🔥 🔥 (Last before year), Shirley got very good grades.

  1. Before last year52%
  2. Before year last5%
  3. The year before last19%
  4. The last year before23%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

❤11

29 Aug 2026, 02:47 UTC≈1,770 views14 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Poll

MORNING BOOSTER 180 🔥🔥 As we did not have a route map, “we lost“.

  1. we are lost18%
  2. we got lost59%
  3. we were losing9%
  4. we all lost14%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

❤11💔3

28 Aug 2026, 02:58 UTC≈1,940 views13 reactionsread 2 September 2026

❤️ Happy Raksha Bandhan to everyone! Wishing you all a day filled with happiness, love and beautiful memories. ✨ May this bond of love and care always remain strong. 🙏

❤13

25 Aug 2026, 16:36 UTC≈2,650 views15 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Poll

NIGHT BOOSTER SERIES 🔥🔥 Civil society groups have resolved to plug ............ the massive loopholes plaguing the public distribution system.

  1. ​up11%
  2. ​in38%
  3. ​on10%
  4. ​out41%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

❤12😱3

25 Aug 2026, 14:15 UTC≈2,280 views12 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Poll

EDITORIAL BASED FIXED PREP. ❤️ The rising urban inflation rates impart urgency ............ the central bank’s upcoming monetary policy review.

  1. ​to35%
  2. ​for22%
  3. ​upon28%
  4. ​with15%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

❤10🔥1😢1

25 Aug 2026, 10:39 UTC≈2,180 views13 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Poll

FIXED PREPOSITION | CGL SPECIAL We must not despair .......... the face of temporary setbacks.

  1. in14%
  2. ​at31%
  3. ​on24%
  4. ​with32%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

❤13

Showing the 12 most recent of 92 posts we hold for @irfankaconcept. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 6 most recent of 58 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

1 Sept 2026, 14:29 UTCAnonymous Quiz557 voters

CGL EXPECTED TYPE 🔥 🔥 The extraordinary powers granted under Article 142 are primarily:

  1. ​Supplemental in nature17%
  2. Absolute and unlimited by statute41%
  3. Restricted only to criminal trials14%
  4. ​Exclusive to the Prime Minister's office28%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

30 Aug 2026, 12:19 UTCAnonymous Quiz410 voters

Choose the Correct sequence.

  1. ​B - C - A - D35%
  2. ​B - A - C - D34%
  3. ​A - B - C - D12%
  4. ​B - D - A - C19%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

30 Aug 2026, 03:15 UTCAnonymous Quiz615 voters

CGL MAINS SPECIAL 🔥🔥 The dog's ears perked up as it .......... the faint sound of its owner's footsteps.

  1. ascertained26%
  2. deciphered39%
  3. surmised13%
  4. discerned22%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

29 Aug 2026, 05:18 UTCAnonymous Quiz708 voters

CGL MOST OST EXPECTED 🔥 🔥 (Last before year), Shirley got very good grades.

  1. Before last year52%
  2. Before year last5%
  3. The year before last19%
  4. The last year before23%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

29 Aug 2026, 02:47 UTCAnonymous Quiz667 voters

MORNING BOOSTER 180 🔥🔥 As we did not have a route map, “we lost“.

  1. we are lost18%
  2. we got lost59%
  3. we were losing9%
  4. we all lost14%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

25 Aug 2026, 16:36 UTCAnonymous Quiz714 voters

NIGHT BOOSTER SERIES 🔥🔥 Civil society groups have resolved to plug ............ the massive loopholes plaguing the public distribution system.

  1. ​up11%
  2. ​in38%
  3. ​on10%
  4. ​out41%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 92 most recent posts we hold, published 12 August 2026 to 1 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Railway Jobs NTPC RPF RRB Group D
@Railway_Jobs_NTPC_ALP_RPF_group · 111,216
Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 14 August 2026
Academis 🎓
@academis · 38,123
Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 31 August 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Irfan Ka Concept (Official) 🎓” (@irfankaconcept), 13,360 subscribers as measured 25 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/irfankaconcept.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.