Channel
@irllsres
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
2subscribers
+1 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1004299698941 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @irllsres |
| Created | 16 July 2026 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 14 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 3 times, most recently 10 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/irllsres |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 24 Aug 2026, 21:17 | 2 | +1 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 08:32 | 1 | no change |
| 9 Aug 2026, 10:47 | 1 | first reading |
13 posts held, back to 16 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 13 posts for this entry, the most recent from 12 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
3 reactions across 3 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 1 | 33.3% | |
| 🔥 | 1 | 33.3% | |
| 🕊 | 1 | 33.3% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 3 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 16 July 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
мега яикто по возможности рт 1. митсури 2. моришаа 3. жання 4. оверсер 5. эмпти 6. хэйто 7. адск 8. фиви 9. лекона 10. готье 11. мэднесс 12. рео 13. сиквел 14. мичимэй 15. вестл 16. лирика 17. 18. 19. йоши 20. хэллчик 21. 22. 23. 24. фанатка 25. 26. 27. эл 28. северок 29. вилка 30. 31. 32. ари 33. зеленка 34. ксавьер 35. 36. 37. 38. 39. дефект 40. окотокси 41. 42. 43. 44. фима 45. 46. криттик 47. сушння 48. рика 49.…
я и кто 1. мэднесс 2. алиса мопс 3. митсури 4. лика 5. принц
линчфд просили помню и слышу 1. лекона
ну шо вы как отошли? продолжим эфадину 1. сиквел
пока снова балуюсь 1. оверсер
БЫСТРЕЕ 1. алиса ❤️❤️ теперь это алонсо сюка обожаю
1. митсури 2. вилка
@TenshiiMizuiro, 𝗒𝗈𝗎 𝖺𝗋𝖾 . . . 𝗀𝖺𝖻𝗋𝗂𝖾𝗅 𝖻𝗈𝗋𝗍𝗈𝗅𝖾𝗍𝗈 & 𝗇𝗂𝖼𝗈 𝗁ü𝗅𝗄𝖾𝗇𝖻𝖾𝗋𝗀 по количеству фансервиса и химии напоминает повседневное аниме с романтикой на 12 серий
🕊1
@barankas1, 𝗒𝗈𝗎 𝖺𝗋𝖾 . . . 𝗅𝖺𝗇𝖽𝗈 𝗇𝗈𝗋𝗋𝗂𝗌 & 𝗈𝗌𝖼𝖺𝗋 𝗉𝗂𝖺𝗌𝗍𝗋𝗂 база, но отчасти больше выглядит как броманс
@vampirebleeder, 𝗒𝗈𝗎 𝖺𝗋𝖾 . . . 𝗀𝖾𝗈𝗋𝗀𝖾 𝗋𝗎𝗌𝗌𝖾𝗅𝗅 & 𝗆𝖺𝗑 𝗏𝖾𝗋𝗌𝗍𝖺𝗉𝗉𝖾𝗇 муж аутист и его королева(я), что может быть лучше?
❤1
@QWliquid24, 𝗒𝗈𝗎 𝖺𝗋𝖾 . . . 𝗅𝖺𝗇𝖼𝖾 𝗌𝗍𝗋𝗈𝗅𝗅 & 𝖾𝗌𝗍𝖾𝖻𝖺𝗇 𝗈𝖼𝗈𝗇 его величество и шут
@d1sgust1ngg, 𝗒𝗈𝗎 𝖺𝗋𝖾 . . . 𝗈𝗅𝗂𝗏𝖾𝗋 𝖻𝖾𝖺𝗋𝗆𝖺𝗇 & 𝗄𝗂𝗆𝗂 𝖺𝗇𝗍𝗈𝗇𝖾𝗅𝗅𝗂 сколько часов вы проводите в рб и как часто вы слышите от взрослых штуки про зумеров и сдвг?
🔥1
Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @irllsres. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 24 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“резы” (@irllsres), 2 subscribers as measured 24 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/irllsres.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.