Channel
@iroxaxaxa
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
36subscribers
+2 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003554798661 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @iroxaxaxa |
| Created | Between 1 December 2025 and 31 May 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 16 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/iroxaxaxa |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Sept 2026, 01:40 | 36 | +2 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 22:57 | 34 | +1 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 22:03 | 33 | -1 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 00:47 | 34 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 08:31 | 34 | first reading |
17 posts held, back to 3 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 10 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
234 reactions across 17 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 59.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 138 | 59.0% | |
| 🌚 | 46 | 19.7% | |
| 🍓 | 43 | 18.4% | |
| ❤🔥 | 4 | 1.71% | |
| 🤔 | 2 | 0.855% | |
| 😨 | 1 | 0.427% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 234 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 3 July 2026 to 10 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
бля как же заебали кпоперы ныть про ремиксы бумпала я твой биас мизинчик вверх, все артисты делаю ремиксы, вам будто их в глотку суют и заставляют слушать ремиксы лсф популярнее чем все релизы кпоп групп в 2026 сколько можно блять
🍓5❤4❤🔥4
хд, но нд заслужили все эти высмеивания с ассамблеей, потому что настолько притянуть за уши ситуацию и раздуть ее до таких масштабов еще уметь нужно
❤10🍓3🌚2
помню когда нд сообщили, что возращаются в адор, хайб стэны шутили, что в компании 11 лифтов, и просили выделить один из только для нд, чтобы другие группы не пересекались с девочками, а то не дай бог за косой взгляд они отправятся на ассамблею оон по защите прав человека 😭😭😭
❤10🍓4🌚3
Posted without readable text
❤9🍓4🌚3
так, возможно, вы уже видели, но мне попались 2-3 видео с обвинениями айллит в том, что они станцевали тренд с девушкой из снл корея, которая снялась в пародии на ханни, когда та выступала на нац ассмаблее. пародия была реально жесткой - высмеивались и акцент, и внешность, и сам факт выступления. да, неприятненько (мне похуй). комментарии под видео соответствующие. но почему-то эти комментаторы и в целом часть банн…
❤9🌚3🍓3
прикиньте как ОХУЕЮТ баннис, когда узнают, что причина всех бед это не дебют айллит, а еще семилетнего плана НЕ СУЩЕСТВУЕТ
❤11🌚1🍓1
верить в 2026 что у нд есть что-то уникальное 💀💀
❤10🍓4🌚2
блять 😭😭 сука 😭😭 мы теперь оправдываем ненависть к девочкам-подросткам "это хайб их подставил, а нас заставил хейтить группу" насколько же нужно быть тупой тварью, чтобы перекидывать свою ответственность и свой выбор на компанию, ну ето песдес ребят
❤11🌚3🍓3
баннис страдают я счастлива
❤11🌚4🍓1
адор выкатил контент с ньюджинс от4 токкисы плачут, что нет даниэль...... кролики могут не отчаиваться, ведь может быть в будущем от5 будут работать вместе во время новой рекламы в макдональдс дани теперь там главный амбассадор
❤12🌚6🍓1
скоро камбэк клянусь
❤8
БЛЯ
❤8🌚5🍓2
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @iroxaxaxa. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ирохахаха” (@iroxaxaxa), 36 subscribers as measured 9 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/iroxaxaxa.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.