Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Искловый котелок️

Channel

Искловый котелок️

@iskly

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

11,271subscribers

-374 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001749959106
TypeChannel
Username@iskly
DescriptionОпять этот Роман Предложка / Реклама / Личное - @iskler_bot
Created10 January 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live4 November 2026
Measurements held55
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 4 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/iskly

Topic

Gaming — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 49% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

11,24511,64511,4457 August 2026 — 11,645 subscribers7 August 2026 — 11,639 subscribers8 August 2026 — 11,634 subscribers9 August 2026 — 11,633 subscribers10 August 2026 — 11,628 subscribers11 August 2026 — 11,627 subscribers12 August 2026 — 11,633 subscribers15 August 2026 — 11,627 subscribers16 August 2026 — 11,629 subscribers18 August 2026 — 11,625 subscribers19 August 2026 — 11,619 subscribers20 August 2026 — 11,615 subscribers21 August 2026 — 11,610 subscribers23 August 2026 — 11,606 subscribers25 August 2026 — 11,587 subscribers26 August 2026 — 11,581 subscribers27 August 2026 — 11,577 subscribers28 August 2026 — 11,559 subscribers29 August 2026 — 11,552 subscribers30 August 2026 — 11,550 subscribers31 August 2026 — 11,545 subscribers1 September 2026 — 11,534 subscribers2 September 2026 — 11,531 subscribers3 September 2026 — 11,519 subscribers5 September 2026 — 11,508 subscribers9 September 2026 — 11,492 subscribers11 September 2026 — 11,487 subscribers13 September 2026 — 11,482 subscribers15 September 2026 — 11,471 subscribers17 September 2026 — 11,462 subscribers19 September 2026 — 11,446 subscribers26 September 2026 — 11,405 subscribers4 October 2026 — 11,373 subscribers8 October 2026 — 11,341 subscribers13 October 2026 — 11,333 subscribers14 October 2026 — 11,315 subscribers16 October 2026 — 11,305 subscribers17 October 2026 — 11,306 subscribers18 October 2026 — 11,302 subscribers19 October 2026 — 11,298 subscribers20 October 2026 — 11,286 subscribers21 October 2026 — 11,275 subscribers23 October 2026 — 11,276 subscribers24 October 2026 — 11,270 subscribers24 October 2026 — 11,262 subscribers25 October 2026 — 11,256 subscribers26 October 2026 — 11,253 subscribers27 October 2026 — 11,248 subscribers28 October 2026 — 11,245 subscribers29 October 2026 — 11,267 subscribers31 October 2026 — 11,283 subscribers1 November 2026 — 11,281 subscribers2 November 2026 — 11,277 subscribers3 November 2026 — 11,276 subscribers4 November 2026 — 11,271 subscribers11,2717 August 20264 November 2026
55 measurements spanning 89 days, net -374. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 11,185–11,705 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 55
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
4 Nov 2026, 09:3811,271-5
3 Nov 2026, 06:5911,276-1
2 Nov 2026, 05:1711,277-4
1 Nov 2026, 03:2811,281-2
31 Oct 2026, 02:1011,283+16
29 Oct 2026, 23:1411,267+22
28 Oct 2026, 23:2011,245-3
27 Oct 2026, 19:4011,248-5
26 Oct 2026, 22:1711,253-3
25 Oct 2026, 21:5111,256-6
24 Oct 2026, 22:2711,262-8
24 Oct 2026, 00:0611,270-6
23 Oct 2026, 00:1611,276+1
21 Oct 2026, 22:5911,275-11
20 Oct 2026, 17:5811,286-12
19 Oct 2026, 14:0411,298-4
18 Oct 2026, 10:4411,302-4
17 Oct 2026, 12:3611,306+1
16 Oct 2026, 13:0611,305-10
14 Oct 2026, 14:4111,315first reading

Engagement

101 posts held, back to 30 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 51 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
43.5%
avg views ÷ 11,271 subscribers
Avg views / post
4,900
22 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.82%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
22
of 101 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 November 2026
Posts held101 (30 July 2026 – 4 November 2026)
Views total107,760
Reactions total3,043
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken4 Nov 2026, 19:27 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈2,110
Videos
≈175
Links
≈501

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 4 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
1m 27s
Average length
17s

Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

19,918 reactions across 101 posts, in 22 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 25.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤5,03325.3%
😁3,51417.6%
🤡2,85314.3%
👍1,9699.89%
custom 52088672906945761841,6958.51%
🔥1,5647.85%
💩7193.61%
😱6033.03%
👎5062.54%
❤‍🔥4502.26%
🕊2661.34%
🗿2391.20%
🤯1530.768%
🤬1440.723%
🍾900.452%
🦄890.447%
😢200.1%
custom 526960399948029109330.015%
👀30.015%
☃20.01%
2 further kinds30.015%

Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 101 of the 101 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 19,918 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 101 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 4 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
5
across the posts below
Posts paid on
3
of 101 we hold a reading for · 3%
Most on one post
3
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @iskly. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 101 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 30 July 2026 to 4 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 12 of 22 posts held from the last 30 days (54.5%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

4 Nov 2026, 17:42 UTC≈1,340 views140 reactionsread 4 November 2026
Photo

Как жаль что в эпоху ИИ, даже шедевральные превьюшки мармока ньюфаги начали считать ИИ Хотя он такие превью делал еще 10 лет назад Страшная тенденция

❤125custom 52088672906945761849👍4💩2

3 Nov 2026, 17:49 UTC≈2,960 views167 reactionsread 4 November 2026
Photo

Слава «коммунистической империальной колониальной России» P.S - Ролик 6-7 ноября

❤141custom 520886729069457618415💩6🕊3👎1🔥1

2 Nov 2026, 09:43 UTC≈3,880 views259 reactionsread 4 November 2026
Photo

Что за анонсы от госуслуг???

🔥195custom 520886729069457618429😁23❤7💩4👍1

1 Nov 2026, 12:49 UTC≈4,380 views113 reactionsread 4 November 2026
Voice message

Voice message, posted without a caption

🤡86custom 520886729069457618420💩3🔥3👎1

1 Nov 2026, 12:46 UTC≈4,360 views109 reactionsread 4 November 2026
Photo

Надоели комиссии при пополнении Стима и завышенные цены на игры? Ну хватит это терпеть — переходите на сайт Donatella. Пока другие компании дерут с вас конские наценки и неделями не отвечают в поддержке — новый сервис Donatella ВООБЩЕ УБРАЛ ВСЮ КОМИССИЮ и держит постоянную связь со своими покупателями. Ловите мой промик ISKL — и сами проверяйте. Вам не придется переплачивать ни копейки — закинули 1000 рублей — пол…

🤡92❤9💩3👎2🔥2👍1

1 Nov 2026, 12:46 UTC≈3,630 views99 reactionsread 4 November 2026
Voice message

1000 = 1000 ISKL промик

🤡73custom 520886729069457618414👍4🔥4💩3👎1

31 Oct 2026, 10:31 UTC≈3,910 views126 reactionsread 4 November 2026
Photo

К 6 ноябрю выйдет огромный ролик про Victoria 3 За Россию в новом DLC которое посвящено России - где мы доиграем чуть ли не до 1936 года

🔥104❤11💩7😱3🤡1

31 Oct 2026, 09:00 UTC≈4,190 views97 reactionsread 4 November 2026
Photo

Я ЖДУ HEARTS OF IRON 5… И МНЕ СТРАШНО ( в ролике гости: Potolot, Maratii, РИЧ ) СМОТРЕТЬ - https://youtu.be/Ee1JFLuez1o Буду благодарен вашей поддержке, комменту и лайкусику 😘

custom 520886729069457618475❤13💩5🔥3👍1

31 Oct 2026, 07:13 UTC≈4,430 views175 reactionsread 4 November 2026

Парламент Франции одобрил налог на интернет-трафик для зарубежных платформ Google, Netflix, Amazon, и других Планируется вводить сбор €0,055 за каждый гигабайт, переданный французским пользователям. Авторы поправки рассчитывают собирать таким образом около €10 млрд в год ХАХАХАХА, говорил у нас введут, но ввели во Франции. Демократия что еще сказать

❤127😁34🗿6💩5😱3

31 Oct 2026, 06:55 UTC≈4,030 views71 reactionsread 4 November 2026

Через пару часов ролик! В 11-12 по МСК анонс будет тут Скажу лишь ОДНО на ролике будут гости - РИЧ, Maratii hoi4, Potolot Попробуйте угадать ролик Так что готовьте печенюхи, чаек или чет поинтереснее

🔥63💩3👍2😱2👎1

31 Oct 2026, 06:14 UTC≈3,840 views145 reactionsread 4 November 2026

Posted without readable text

😁114😱13🔥8❤4custom 52088672906945761844💩2

30 Oct 2026, 19:28 UTC≈4,090 views177 reactionsread 4 November 2026
Photo

Там это сообщается что "ИИ пузырь" лопнул в США и Китае Массово все летит вниз

custom 5208867290694576184158❤8💩6👎2🕊2🤡1

Showing the 12 most recent of 101 posts we hold for @iskly. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@iskly edited 2 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
8 August 2026
Most recent edit
23 August 2026

Posts recorded as deleted after publishing

We recorded 3 posts on @iskly as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.

A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.

First seen missing
11 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
22 August 2026
Median time before seen missing
29 hours
Seen missing in the last 30 days
0

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

CrewGTW
@CrewGTW_Official · 19,379
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 1 October 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Искловый котелок️” (@iskly), 11,271 subscribers as measured 4 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/iskly.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.