Channel
@islam_dag_ai
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
14subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003489623085 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @islam_dag_ai |
| Description | Ислам. Исламский канал про искусственный интеллект (AI) и Data Science. Islam, AI & Technology. |
| Created | Between 1 November 2025 and 31 March 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 12 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/islam_dag_ai |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 01:30 | 14 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 19:21 | 14 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 28 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
3 reactions across 3 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 3 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 28 May 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Сейчас бизнес в России живёт не в «плохом квартале», а в новой реальности: дорогие деньги, осторожный спрос и рост издержек одновременно. 💸 Если ставка держится высоко, кредит перестаёт быть топливом для роста и становится роскошью. На этом фоне первыми проседают компании с длинным циклом сделки, низкой маржой и зависимостью от импорта. Но кризис — это не только про падение, а ещё и про жёсткий отбор моделей. 📉 Перв…
Signed Content factory
ие. Не «делаем всё подряд», а выстраиваем систему, где каждый элемент решает задачу. 🛠️ **Что это даёт тебе** Ты получаешь более предсказуемый процесс, понятные этапы, меньше потерь на переделках и продукт, который можно запускать и масштабировать без постоянного ощущения, что всё держится на честном слове. А если цель — не просто присутствие в digital, а реальная польза для бизнеса, такой подход окупается особенно …
Signed Content factory
Большинство IT-проектов тормозят не потому, что рынок сложный. А потому что идею пытаются превратить в продукт рывками: здесь заказали дизайн, там нашли разработчика, потом отдельно решили «добавить AI». В итоге вместо цельного решения получается набор фрагментов, которые трудно соединить между собой. И именно это съедает время, деньги и мотивацию. 🧩 **В чём настоящая проблема** Когда нет единой логики, продукт начи…
Signed Content factory
, но очень быстрые команды? 🚀
Signed Content factory
Иногда о бизнесе больше говорит не большая стратегия, а маленький технический тест. Сейчас как раз такой случай: вышел демо-пост №3 для клиента в MAX — короткая проверка автопостинга, но для компаний это не мелочь, а сигнал 🚀 Если публикация уходит в канал стабильно, быстро и без ручной рутины, команда экономит время на самом дорогом ресурсе — внимании людей. Почему это важно: любой автопостинг — это не просто «удоб…
Signed Content factory
Video, posted without a caption
https://youtu.be/eOhSm5zOZcQ?is=aJ3HNva8zbDZ892e
Photo, posted without a caption
POV: You are a cat, according to artificial intelligence. 😹🌌🛰️ 👉 Vukovich talks AI! Subscribe!
Да токены жрет ,но и тз огромное,хотя здесь из 5 строк 1я -10 тестов,так что пока норм ,иногда вообще не успеваешь нажать yes dont ask again ,сразу другой yes дает и самое главное, все модели что опус 4.8, что gpt5.5,выполняли последовательного, а этот параллельно все делает,(см скрин ) и я не успеваю нажать; yes dont ask again,как сразу следующий yes выходят,короче летает pable5 ! Что по мне вся проблема в замедл…
❤1
Все за 15 мин прошёл и yes нажимал чаще,чем где либо
По лимитам тоже норм ,я думал улечу, но нет норм для такой модели,на сонет как закончил проверил контекст окно было 19,а недельный 3,так что в полне можно работать
❤1
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @islam_dag_ai. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Islam ☝️/ Ai” (@islam_dag_ai), 14 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/islam_dag_ai.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.