Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ISPI - Geopolitica

Channel

ISPI - Geopolitica

@ispionline

Verified by Telegram

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

27,747subscribers

-18 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001391054224
TypeChannel
Username@ispionline
DescriptionResta aggiornato sulle ultime analisi e discussioni sulla politica internazionale, le crisi globali e le dinamiche geopolitiche direttamente dalla voce autorevole dell'Istituto per gli Studi di Politica Internazionale. www.ispionline.it
Created18 February 2021measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live29 August 2026
Measurements held18
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 29 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/ispionline

Growth

27,74327,76927,7566 August 2026 — 27,765 subscribers7 August 2026 — 27,763 subscribers7 August 2026 — 27,767 subscribers8 August 2026 — 27,769 subscribers11 August 2026 — 27,768 subscribers12 August 2026 — 27,767 subscribers13 August 2026 — 27,765 subscribers14 August 2026 — 27,768 subscribers16 August 2026 — 27,766 subscribers17 August 2026 — 27,762 subscribers18 August 2026 — 27,761 subscribers19 August 2026 — 27,759 subscribers20 August 2026 — 27,758 subscribers22 August 2026 — 27,751 subscribers25 August 2026 — 27,746 subscribers26 August 2026 — 27,743 subscribers28 August 2026 — 27,746 subscribers29 August 2026 — 27,747 subscribers27,7476 August 202629 August 2026
18 measurements spanning 22 days, net -18. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 27,739–27,773 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
29 Aug 2026, 02:3727,747+1
28 Aug 2026, 03:0427,746+3
26 Aug 2026, 03:1827,743-3
25 Aug 2026, 01:5927,746-5
22 Aug 2026, 04:1527,751-7
20 Aug 2026, 20:4327,758-1
19 Aug 2026, 17:4527,759-2
18 Aug 2026, 20:4527,761-1
17 Aug 2026, 18:2827,762-4
16 Aug 2026, 16:4627,766-2
14 Aug 2026, 23:3527,768+3
13 Aug 2026, 16:0827,765-2
12 Aug 2026, 12:3827,767-1
11 Aug 2026, 15:5527,768-1
8 Aug 2026, 21:0527,769+2
7 Aug 2026, 23:4127,767+4
7 Aug 2026, 03:0027,763-2
6 Aug 2026, 23:3227,765first reading

Engagement

42 posts held, back to 24 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 49 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
17.0%
avg views ÷ 27,747 subscribers
Avg views / post
4,710
32 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.404%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
32
of 42 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 August 2026
Posts held42 (24 July 202628 August 2026)
Views total150,780
Reactions total609
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken29 Aug 2026, 19:49 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
2,010
Links
2,070

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 29 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Reaction mix

775 reactions across 42 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 27.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🤔21327.5%
15720.3%
😡14819.1%
👍11014.2%
😢374.77%
😁314.00%
🔥303.87%
👎283.61%
👏81.03%
🤩50.645%
😱40.516%
🤯20.258%
🎉10.129%
🤨10.129%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 42 of the 42 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 775reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 42 most recent posts we hold, published 24 July 2026 to 28 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

28 Aug 2026, 16:22 UTC≈2,340 views12 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

L’Islanda al bivio europeo 👉 Leggi il Daily Focus di oggi: https://www.ispionline.it/it/pubblicazione/lislanda-al-bivio-europeo-243629 📖 La stretta di Israele sulla Cisgiordania mette alla prova i suoi alleati. Leggi l’ultima newsletter Med This Week: https://www.ispionline.it/en/publication/israels-west-bank-push-tests-its-allies-243588 🎙️ Che fine hanno fatto i BRICS? Guarda la nuova puntata di Globally: https:/

👍7🔥31🤔1

28 Aug 2026, 16:20 UTC≈2,160 views9 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

⛴ Hormuz, desiderio di normalità Ieri il primo ministro del Qatar è arrivato a Teheran per discutere con il ministro degli esteri iraniano della riapertura dello stretto di Hormuz. In queste settimane sono stati diversi i tentativi di riaprire un tavolo negoziale, tra cui quelli di Oman e Pakistan. Tentativi però finora andati a vuoto. Tra i paesi del Golfo il Qatar è uno dei più colpiti dalla crisi: da marzo i suoi

😡8🤔1

27 Aug 2026, 16:27 UTC≈2,870 views18 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

Mosca, il mistero di Ratcliffe 👉 Leggi il Daily Focus di oggi: https://www.ispionline.it/it/pubblicazione/mosca-il-mistero-di-ratcliffe-243575

🤔13🔥4👍1

27 Aug 2026, 16:27 UTC≈2,810 views19 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

🔴 Nepal-Tibet, il giorno dopo È salito a 362 il numero delle vittime accertate causate dalla violenta inondazione che ieri ha colpito la regione al confine tra Nepal e Tibet. Intanto continuano le operazioni di ricerca nell’area, dove si contano ancora oltre 1.400 dispersi, tra cui molti turisti stranieri. I dettagli finora disponibili sembrano indicare che a innescare il disastro sia stato il distacco di una porzio

😢153😡1

26 Aug 2026, 16:38 UTC≈3,060 views13 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

Dazi Usa-Canada: la sfida di Carney 👉 Leggi il Daily Focus di oggi: https://www.ispionline.it/it/pubblicazione/dazi-usa-canada-la-sfida-di-carney-243532

👏7👍3🤔21

26 Aug 2026, 16:38 UTC≈2,920 views20 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

🇺🇸 USA: nuova stretta sull’immigrazione Gli Stati Uniti hanno sospeso temporaneamente il rilascio dei visti, rinviando gli appuntamenti dei richiedenti a “data da destinarsi”. La motivazione dichiarata? Consentire al personale consolare statunitense di partecipare a “corsi di formazione” sulla valutazione delle richieste. Ma è solo l’ultima misura decisa dall’amministrazione Trump per ridurre l’ingresso di cittadini

😡7👎5🤔32👍2😁1

25 Aug 2026, 16:32 UTC≈3,230 views14 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

Iran: un D-Day a metà 👉 Leggi il Daily Focus di oggi: https://www.ispionline.it/it/pubblicazione/iran-un-d-day-a-meta-243513

😁8🤔2😢21👍1

25 Aug 2026, 16:32 UTC≈3,160 views15 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

🇺🇸🇨🇳 Cina, nuovi dazi USA in vista? A meno di un mese dall’incontro tra Trump e Xi Jinping in programma a Washington, nuovi dazi americani potrebbero essere in arrivo per Pechino. Secondo alcune indiscrezioni la Casa Bianca starebbe valutando dazi al 7,5% su prodotti cinesi. Il motivo? L’eccesso di capacità industriale che, alimentato da ingenti sussidi statali, contribuisce a inondare i mercati globali di prodotti

🤔7😁42👍1😢1

24 Aug 2026, 16:10 UTC≈3,730 views12 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

L’indipendenza ucraina sotto le bombe 👉 Leggi il Daily Focus di oggi: https://www.ispionline.it/it/pubblicazione/lindipendenza-ucraina-sotto-le-bombe-243493

7🤔3👎1😡1

24 Aug 2026, 16:10 UTC≈3,610 views13 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

🇺🇸🇨🇦 Dazi USA-Canada: dalle minacce ai fatti? Alta tensione tra Ottawa e Washington dopo il fallimento dei negoziati che la scorsa settimana avrebbero dovuto portare a un accordo sui dazi. Così la Casa Bianca passa all’attacco, imponendo dazi del 50% su alcuni prodotti canadesi. In assenza di una soluzione negoziale, i contro-dazi canadesi entreranno in vigore l’8 settembre. Questo nuovo episodio di “guerra commerci

6🤔3👍2🔥1😡1

21 Aug 2026, 14:45 UTC≈5,530 views38 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

🔴 Cisgiordania: Israele accelera sul piano E1 Il governo israeliano accelera sul progetto E1, con una gara per la costruzione di oltre 1.200 nuove abitazioni tra Gerusalemme Est e Ma’ale Adumim. Il piano rischia di compromettere la continuità territoriale palestinese e allontanare ulteriormente la prospettiva dei due Stati. La decisione ha provocato una dura condanna internazionale, riaccendendo lo scontro sull’espa

😡342👍2

20 Aug 2026, 14:34 UTC≈5,170 views32 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

🇺🇦🪖 Zelensky: una crisi su più fronti Zelensky attraversa una fase di forte difficoltà, stretto tra nuove inchieste anticorruzione, pressioni politiche e problemi sul fronte militare. L’ex ministro della Difesa Mykhailo Fedorov cresce nei sondaggi e chiede il ritorno alle urne, mentre gli scandali coinvolgono figure vicine alla presidenza. Intanto, i nuovi attacchi russi mettono sotto pressione le difese aeree ucrai

16🔥7🤔3😢3👍2🤯1

Showing the 12 most recent of 42 posts we hold for @ispionline. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,514,494 of 1,626,884entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Will Media
@will_media · 41,526
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 29 August 2026
il Post
@ilpost_official · 47,383
Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 26 August 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 29 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ISPI - Geopolitica” (@ispionline), 27,747 subscribers as measured 29 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ispionline.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.