Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Сообщество ispmanager

Supergroup

Сообщество ispmanager

@ispmanager_community

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Citations · Referenced elsewhere · Cite this entry

1,103members

+4 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

61 online right now

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001571862211
TypeSupergroup
Username@ispmanager_community
DescriptionДобро пожаловать! Правила сообщества тут: https://taplink.cc/ispmanager_community Обсуждаем статьи, фичи, тренды, помогаем. Устраивайтесь поудобней. ;) Паблик: t.me/ispmanager Фичреквесты и форум: https://www.ispmanager.ru/community
First recorded6 October 2026
Last confirmed live6 October 2026
Measurements held17
On Telegramt.me/ispmanager_community

Topic

Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 6 October 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 98% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

1,0931,1101,101.57 August 2026 — 1,099 members7 August 2026 — 1,098 members10 August 2026 — 1,097 members13 August 2026 — 1,093 members16 August 2026 — 1,094 members19 August 2026 — 1,098 members23 August 2026 — 1,096 members25 August 2026 — 1,101 members28 August 2026 — 1,103 members31 August 2026 — 1,110 members3 September 2026 — 1,109 members8 September 2026 — 1,105 members12 September 2026 — 1,101 members16 September 2026 — 1,105 members28 September 2026 — 1,107 members5 October 2026 — 1,103 members6 October 2026 — 1,103 members1,1037 August 20266 October 2026
17 measurements spanning 60 days, net +4. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,090–1,113 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every members count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)MembersChange
6 Oct 2026, 18:451,103no change
5 Oct 2026, 23:591,103-4
28 Sept 2026, 14:201,107+2
16 Sept 2026, 00:581,105+4
12 Sept 2026, 16:571,101-4
8 Sept 2026, 15:411,105-4
3 Sept 2026, 09:321,109-1
31 Aug 2026, 12:341,110+7
28 Aug 2026, 09:161,103+2
25 Aug 2026, 19:371,101+5
23 Aug 2026, 05:021,096-2
19 Aug 2026, 19:261,098+4
16 Aug 2026, 17:531,094+1
13 Aug 2026, 10:261,093-4
10 Aug 2026, 13:511,097-1
7 Aug 2026, 12:511,098-1
7 Aug 2026, 09:481,099first reading

Engagement

Posts not read yet. This entry is on the register from its profile alone; the post reader has not reached it. Engagement figures appear here once posts have actually been measured — we do not publish a rate before we have the readings behind it.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Referenced elsewhere

This handle named by sources this register does not control and did not measure — each shown exactly as found, attributed by name, dated to when it was read.

Wikipedia

One Wikipedia article names this handle in its article text, found by searching for a t.me link inside the article source. A citation is a notability signal, not a verification: nobody here confirmed the cited post is genuine or still says what the article quotes. Article text is CC BY-SA 4.0, Wikipedia contributors; snippets below are short excerpts.

Ispmanager (ru.wikipedia.org)
“…Официальная документация ispmanager] * [https://t.me/ispmanager Официальный канал ispmanager в Telegram] * [https://t.me/ispmanager_community Официальное русскоязычное…”
read 13 September 2026

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Сообщество ispmanager” (@ispmanager_community), 1,103 members as measured 6 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ispmanager_community.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.