Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ISPsystem — облака, инфраструктура, хостинг

Channel

ISPsystem — облака, инфраструктура, хостинг

@ispsystem_ru

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,230subscribers

-5 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001714103350
TypeChannel
Username@ispsystem_ru
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live5 September 2026
Measurements held10
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 5 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/ispsystem_ru

Growth

1,2291,2371,2337 August 2026 — 1,235 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,235 subscribers10 August 2026 — 1,237 subscribers14 August 2026 — 1,234 subscribers17 August 2026 — 1,232 subscribers24 August 2026 — 1,229 subscribers27 August 2026 — 1,232 subscribers30 August 2026 — 1,231 subscribers2 September 2026 — 1,229 subscribers5 September 2026 — 1,230 subscribers1,2307 August 20265 September 2026
10 measurements spanning 30 days, net -5. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,228–1,238 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
5 Sept 2026, 22:381,230+1
2 Sept 2026, 05:481,229-2
30 Aug 2026, 15:131,231-1
27 Aug 2026, 07:371,232+3
24 Aug 2026, 13:171,229-3
17 Aug 2026, 20:551,232-2
14 Aug 2026, 12:281,234-3
10 Aug 2026, 16:521,237+2
7 Aug 2026, 02:161,235no change
7 Aug 2026, 02:041,235first reading

Engagement

15 posts held, back to 9 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 15 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

205 reactions across 15 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 23.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥4923.9%
3215.6%
😁2914.1%
custom 54272919155717242782813.7%
custom 5773735488179410398178.29%
🦄136.34%
custom 5388628516893892582104.88%
custom 547414095068503729773.41%
custom 531663542467481483262.93%
💯52.44%
custom 525592362240443130331.46%
❤‍🔥31.46%
🎉31.46%

Custom emoji. 6 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 205 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 9 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 08:17 UTC118 views12 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

#дайджест_документации Что нового и важного случилось в июле в документации ISPsystem — а вот сейчас и расскажем! 🚨 Читаем тут ❤️

🔥4🦄2custom 53886285168938925822custom 54272919155717242782custom 53166354246748148321custom 57737354881794103981

5 Aug 2026, 07:04 UTC166 views18 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

#ispMEMager Лица коллег, которые работают в разных часовых поясах 😐

😁7🦄5custom 54272919155717242785🔥1

4 Aug 2026, 07:04 UTC185 views11 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

#хабр #железо #оперативная_память Игры и прикладное ПО усложнялись, каждая новая функция отрезала кусочки от объема ОЗУ, доступного пользователю. Приходилось хитрить, выдумывать нестандартные подходы и всячески изворачиваться, чтобы втиснуть свой код и ресурсы в скромные 48, а то и 16 килобайт оперативной памяти. 👉 На Хабре смотрим, как программистам и инженерам в 1980-х удавалось «запихнуть» объемные проекты в скр

custom 577373548817941039843🔥3custom 54272919155717242781

31 Jul 2026, 09:41 UTC237 views20 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

#хабр #резервное_копирование Снапшот — это не бэкап, а бэкап — это не гарантия 🧠 Что на самом деле защищает наши данные: снапшоты или бэкапы? Каждая из этих технологий решает свою задачу. Но бывает и такое, что снапшоты используют как бэкапы, бэкапы хранят вместе с основными данными, а репликацию считают полноценной заменой резервному копированию. ➡️ В новой статье на Хабре сравним две технологии, посмотрим, как о

🔥9custom 547414095068503729763custom 54272919155717242781custom 57737354881794103981

29 Jul 2026, 08:07 UTC250 views14 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

#ispMEMager ❤️ — удалось разжечь мотивацию 🔥 — удалось разжечь другое место…

5🔥4😁4custom 54272919155717242781

28 Jul 2026, 10:31 UTC252 views10 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Хостинг ближе, чем кажется 🛸 📌 Запуск бизнеса хостинга может выглядеть сложной задачей. Но начинать можно постепенно, например, с перепродажи доменов и SSL-сертификатов — как отдельных услуг или дополнения к виртуальному хостингу. 💡 По мере роста можно расширять предложение: добавлять VPS/VDS, облачные сервисы, выделенные серверы и другие решения. 😱 Главный вызов сегодня — не только выйти на рынок, но и масштабиро

🔥4custom 538862851689389258242

27 Jul 2026, 11:29 UTC238 views10 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

#хабр #eliza #ии Она — Элиза 🤖 Можно ли назвать ELIZA просто набором хитрых шаблонов? И да, и нет. Самое интересное, что еще тогда, в 60-х Вейценбауму пришло в голову разделить механизм обработки языка и логики диалога. И не только пришло в голову — он смог это сделать. Приглашаем на сеанс чтения на Хабр! 📖 🙃 В новой статье обозреваем ELIZA — виртуального собеседника из 60-х, который имитировал психотерапевта.

4custom 57737354881794103984🔥2

22 Jul 2026, 08:39 UTC319 views19 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

#ispMEMager ❤️ — 100% понимания, 0% осуждения 😱

😁6💯53custom 54272919155717242783🦄2

21 Jul 2026, 10:15 UTC307 views7 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

#хабр #ии #вайб_кодинг Довайбкодились... 🫠 Бери инструмент, закрывай задачи в два раза быстрее и иди пить кофе трать оставшееся время на саморазвитие или что-то в таком духе. Или нет? 🤔 В новой статье на Хабре посмотрим, действительно ли ИИ-инструменты экономят время, но убивают понимание кода. И что с этим делать! 😳 ➡️ Читаем здесь!

🦄3🔥2custom 54272919155717242782

17 Jul 2026, 08:37 UTC487 views19 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Вы тоже слышите этот пятничный тыгыдык? 🐈 Подождите, он всё ближе... 😱 Да это же летне-отпускной выпуск журнала #чистый_кот(д)! Выдыхаем и наслаждаемся пятницей за приятным чтивом! ☀️

🔥7😁7custom 54272919155717242783custom 53166354246748148322

15 Jul 2026, 11:00 UTC319 views13 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

#хабр #ИИ #ИИ_разработка Популярное последние десятилетия «погугли», всё больше замещается «спроси у ИИ». Александр Брюханов, наш руководитель разработки, в новой статье на Хабре поделился опытом работы с ИИ и мыслями на этот счёт 🤔 🚨 Статья писалась не с целью поделиться конкретными практиками использования ИИ, а чтобы высказаться на тему: «А зачем мне это надо для сомневающихся, и чем оно мне грозит для свято ве

🔥6custom 57737354881794103984🎉3

15 Jul 2026, 08:24 UTC273 views23 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

#ispMEMager Пора выбирать, на какой стороне вы! 🐺 ❤️ — «сначала потом» 🐺 — «затем дедлайн»

custom 5427291915571724278107😁5🦄1

Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @ispsystem_ru. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ISPsystem — облака, инфраструктура, хостинг” (@ispsystem_ru), 1,230 subscribers as measured 5 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ispsystem_ru.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.