Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Восстание редуцированных

Channel

Восстание редуцированных

@istoki_slova

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

16,008subscribers

+54 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001236815913
TypeChannel
Username@istoki_slova
Created19 November 2020measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live19 September 2026
Measurements held33
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 19 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/istoki_slova

Topic

Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 91% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

15,91916,00815,963.56 August 2026 — 15,954 subscribers7 August 2026 — 15,954 subscribers8 August 2026 — 15,957 subscribers9 August 2026 — 15,961 subscribers11 August 2026 — 15,956 subscribers12 August 2026 — 15,955 subscribers13 August 2026 — 15,953 subscribers14 August 2026 — 15,954 subscribers15 August 2026 — 15,948 subscribers17 August 2026 — 15,944 subscribers18 August 2026 — 15,941 subscribers19 August 2026 — 15,934 subscribers20 August 2026 — 15,930 subscribers21 August 2026 — 15,933 subscribers22 August 2026 — 15,929 subscribers24 August 2026 — 15,924 subscribers25 August 2026 — 15,919 subscribers26 August 2026 — 15,923 subscribers27 August 2026 — 15,924 subscribers28 August 2026 — 15,967 subscribers29 August 2026 — 15,968 subscribers30 August 2026 — 15,980 subscribers31 August 2026 — 15,978 subscribers1 September 2026 — 15,968 subscribers2 September 2026 — 15,971 subscribers3 September 2026 — 15,979 subscribers5 September 2026 — 15,986 subscribers8 September 2026 — 15,992 subscribers11 September 2026 — 15,969 subscribers13 September 2026 — 15,988 subscribers14 September 2026 — 15,999 subscribers16 September 2026 — 16,005 subscribers19 September 2026 — 16,008 subscribers6 August 202619 September 2026
33 measurements spanning 44 days, net +54. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 15,906–16,021 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 33
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
19 Sept 2026, 00:1616,008+3
16 Sept 2026, 13:4116,005+6
14 Sept 2026, 20:2115,999+11
13 Sept 2026, 09:1815,988+19
11 Sept 2026, 11:3715,969-23
8 Sept 2026, 21:4115,992+6
5 Sept 2026, 15:3815,986+7
3 Sept 2026, 12:3615,979+8
2 Sept 2026, 05:5515,971+3
1 Sept 2026, 07:3715,968-10
31 Aug 2026, 08:0415,978-2
30 Aug 2026, 05:4715,980+12
29 Aug 2026, 07:1615,968+1
28 Aug 2026, 06:4715,967+43
27 Aug 2026, 06:4415,924+1
26 Aug 2026, 05:5215,923+4
25 Aug 2026, 08:3515,919-5
24 Aug 2026, 12:0815,924-5
22 Aug 2026, 21:1515,929-4
21 Aug 2026, 13:0415,933first reading

Engagement

17 posts held, back to 14 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 54 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
25.1%
avg views ÷ 16,008 subscribers
Avg views / post
4,010
7 posts measured
Reaction rate
8.03%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
7
of 17 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 31 August 2026
Posts held17 (14 July 202631 August 2026)
Views total28,080
Reactions total2,255
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken3 Sept 2026, 10:12 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
5m 23s
Average length
2m 42s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

4,572 reactions across 13 posts, in 30 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 42.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
1,96342.9%
🔥77817.0%
😁54311.9%
👍2455.36%
❤‍🔥1783.89%
😢1663.63%
👏1623.54%
💯1503.28%
🤪1302.84%
💘1142.49%
💔330.722%
😐250.547%
👎130.284%
🥰110.241%
🕊100.219%
🤝100.219%
🏆70.153%
🤔70.153%
🤯40.087%
👻30.066%
10 further kinds200.437%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 5,585 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 14 July 2026 to 31 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

31 Aug 2026, 09:38 UTC≈2,350 views239 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video

Сняла видео на тему того, влияет ли наличие феминитивов в языке на права женщин в обществе. И заодно зову вас на мои лекции о новых феминитивах! Петербург: 5 сентября (сб), 19:00 Москва: 13 сентября (вс), 19:00

151❤‍🔥49👍35💘4

Signed Svetlana Guryanova

26 Aug 2026, 15:30 UTC≈4,620 views543 reactionsread 3 September 2026

Да, это усложняет и замедляет работу. Зато она становится качественнее. Когда я писала свою первую книжку «В начале было кофе», я была очень удивлена тем, что издательство само не предложило этот этап. Мне в итоге без проблем согласовали научного редактора, которого я нашла сама (им стал прекрасный Антон Сомин), и оплатили его работу, но для меня было открытием, что научная редактура для научпоп-книжек — оказывается

326👏102💯74💘28❤‍🔥11👍1🥰1

Signed Svetlana Guryanova

26 Aug 2026, 15:30 UTC≈4,110 views399 reactionsread 3 September 2026

Который день наблюдаю за скандалом вокруг курса Ани Виленской для «Страдариума», и мне есть что сказать… Ибо это уже не просто местечковые разборки, а кейс, затрагивающий сущностные (во всяком случае, для меня) вопросы о том, как должна быть устроена популяризация научного знания. Ну и меня как лектора «Страдариума» он тоже по косой задевает)) Для тех, кто все пропустил: уже несколько лет назад «Страдариум», лектори

253👏52💘43🔥23👍18🏆7🤷‍♂2💯1

Signed Svetlana Guryanova

24 Aug 2026, 11:19 UTC≈4,310 views272 reactionsread 3 September 2026

Вы угадали 😁 Конечно, это лекция про феминитивы. Про мат тема, наоборот, очень популярная. С ней не возникает проблем: вешаешь ограничение 18+, да и всё. А вот феминитивы страшны... Страшно, очень страшно)) А все почему? Потому что пару лет назад в СМИ прогремела новость, что Верховный суд назвал использование феминитивов признаком принадлежности к «экстремистскому движению ЛГБТ» 😑 Вскоре после этого, кстати, сост

154🔥85💘25👍4❤‍🔥2🤯2

Signed Svetlana Guryanova

24 Aug 2026, 09:57 UTC≈3,750 views13 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Poll

Есть у меня набор лекций, которые я периодически повторяю. Догадаетесь, какую лекцию удалось прочесть всего два раза? Она шикарная, но организаторы боятся её брать 😄 И это лекция…

  1. про мат31%
  2. про лингвофриков13%
  3. про феминитивы62%
  4. про жаргон5%

The shares total 111%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

13

Signed Svetlana Guryanova

23 Aug 2026, 15:43 UTC≈4,230 views408 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Заголовок и подзаголовок, к слову, дурацкие. Как мою прямую речь подали то, что я не говорила и сказать не могла. Средний и мужской род слово «кофе» имеет, а не может получить. Средний род уже является нормой, просто не строгой. Разговорные слова — тоже часть литературной нормы. Всё это я, разумеется, рассказывала корреспонденту 😁

198🤪130👍38😐25🔥13😁4

Signed Svetlana Guryanova

23 Aug 2026, 15:19 UTC≈4,710 views381 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Засветилась в РИА Новостях 😅 Не могу сказать, что мечтала об этом. Но я понимала, что если про «кофе» не расскажу я, то это сделает кто-то типа училки Гартман и наплетет, что «кофе» только «он», потому что он «кофий» (это популярный миф), а средний род — ужасная безграмотность. Информацию для РИА я надиктовывала минут пятнадцать. Рассказала и про появление слова «кофе» в русском языке сразу в среднем роде в 17 век

😁184🔥8754👍39🕊10🥰4👎3

Signed Svetlana Guryanova

18 Aug 2026, 09:36 UTC≈5,670 views603 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Новости про моих учеников, которых я готовила к ЕГЭ по русскому Мой предмет они сдали отлично (100, 100, 94), но конкурс в вузы в этом году просто сумасшедший, поэтому я очень волновалась… Но в итоге все поступили! И все на бюджет! • МГУ, фундаментальная и прикладная физика • МГТУ, информатика и вычислительная техника • МЭИ, экономика Ученик, поступивший в МЭИ, ещё и раздумывает, не махнуть ли ему в Китай) Горжус

🔥386❤‍🔥10857👍28🤝10👏8🥰6

Signed Svetlana Guryanova

7 Aug 2026, 11:02 UTC≈6,760 views209 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Если вам интересно порассматривать записи Козьмы Поповича из последнего видео, то вот они)

140😁36🔥19💘11🤯2🗿1

Signed Svetlana Guryanova

7 Aug 2026, 10:19 UTC≈6,050 views313 reactionsread 24 August 2026
Video

⬆️ Длинное душное видео про книжные маргиналии) В записях Козьмы я сохранила орфографию, но добавила разделение на слова и знаки препинания. А ещё записала цифры цифрами и убрала сокращения — все для удобства чтения) Обожаю берестяные грамоты, древние маргиналии и надписи на стенах. Благодаря им люди древности перестают быть безликими тенями, статистикой из учебников. Их голоса будто начинают снова звучать. И оказы

189🔥75😁34👍5❤‍🔥4💘3💯2👎1

Signed Svetlana Guryanova

28 Jul 2026, 16:14 UTC≈9,150 views498 reactionsread 24 August 2026

Для моей новой книжки об истории русского мата (да-да😁) искала записи иностранцев о быте и нравах русского народа века так до семнадцатого. И в процессе набрела на любопытное свидетельство английского дипломата и литератора Джайлса Флетчера в его сочинении «О государстве русском» (1591 г.): «Что касается их свойств и образа жизни, то они обладают хорошими умственными способностями, не имея, однако, тех средств, как

184😢166💯73💔33👍16👎9🤔7😁7

Signed Svetlana Guryanova

21 Jul 2026, 17:12 UTC≈7,110 views249 reactionsread 23 August 2026
Photo

Пришли фотографии с московской лекции на теплоходе! Было ну ооочень душевно! А завтра такая же лекция о будущем русского языка пройдет в Петербурге, и я жду её с трепетом и нетерпением ❤️‍🔥 Погоду, правда, обещают сомнительную, но лекция будет проходить в закрытой части кораблика, так что никакое буйство стихий нас не остановит (как ничто не сдержит изменение языка, ахах 😆) Билеты и подробности тут ⛴️

145🔥65👍28❤‍🔥4😍3🐳2💋2

Signed Svetlana Guryanova

Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @istoki_slova. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

24 Aug 2026, 09:57 UTCAnonymous Poll1,220 voters approx.

Есть у меня набор лекций, которые я периодически повторяю. Догадаетесь, какую лекцию удалось прочесть всего два раза? Она шикарная, но организаторы боятся её брать 😄 И это лекция…

  1. про мат31%
  2. про лингвофриков13%
  3. про феминитивы62%
  4. про жаргон5%

The shares total 111%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 14 July 2026 to 31 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Страшная химия
@chemistrybyolga · 32,845
Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 4 September 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Восстание редуцированных” (@istoki_slova), 16,008 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/istoki_slova.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.