Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ITstatti - Заробіток в інтернеті | Криптовалюта | Інвестиції

Channel

ITstatti - Заробіток в інтернеті | Криптовалюта | Інвестиції

@it_statti

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Cite this entry

9,577subscribers

-133 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001189651400
TypeChannel
Username@it_statti
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live2 September 2026
Measurements held11
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 2 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/it_statti

Growth

9,5779,7109,643.57 August 2026 — 9,710 subscribers7 August 2026 — 9,710 subscribers8 August 2026 — 9,708 subscribers11 August 2026 — 9,695 subscribers14 August 2026 — 9,682 subscribers17 August 2026 — 9,671 subscribers20 August 2026 — 9,651 subscribers24 August 2026 — 9,640 subscribers27 August 2026 — 9,609 subscribers30 August 2026 — 9,600 subscribers2 September 2026 — 9,577 subscribers7 August 20262 September 2026
11 measurements spanning 26 days, net -133. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 9,557–9,730 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
2 Sept 2026, 18:599,577-23
30 Aug 2026, 19:289,600-9
27 Aug 2026, 19:089,609-31
24 Aug 2026, 16:349,640-11
20 Aug 2026, 14:249,651-20
17 Aug 2026, 14:299,671-11
14 Aug 2026, 11:199,682-13
11 Aug 2026, 03:419,695-13
8 Aug 2026, 04:519,708-2
7 Aug 2026, 09:459,710no change
7 Aug 2026, 09:389,710first reading

Engagement

167 posts held, back to 4 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 35 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
7.50%
avg views ÷ 9,577 subscribers
Avg views / post
719
151 posts measured
Reaction rate
5.54%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
151
of 167 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 August 2026
Posts held167 (4 August 202628 August 2026)
Views total108,527
Reactions total6,007
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken29 Aug 2026, 05:42 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

6,634 reactions across 167 posts, in 17 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 66.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍4,37966.0%
🔥87913.2%
83012.5%
🤝4076.14%
340.513%
😱270.407%
🐳170.256%
👏110.166%
👻100.151%
👨‍💻90.136%
🆒80.121%
🎉70.106%
👌60.09%
🙏50.075%
😎30.045%
❤‍🔥10.015%
💯10.015%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 167 of the 167 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 6,634 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 167 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 28 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
77
across the posts below
Posts paid on
47
of 167 we hold a reading for · 28%
Most on one post
6
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @it_statti. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 167 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 4 August 2026 to 28 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

28 Aug 2026, 19:37 UTC528 views13 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

🎥 Заробіток на Binance для новачків - гарантовано від 15 USDC #відео 💎Відео на Ютуб за посиланням 👉 https://youtu.be/rmrkuRMutF0 У цьому відео показую простий заробіток на Binance для нових користувачів: як виконати 3 торгові завдання, отримати 3 спіни та забрати гарантовано від 15 USDC, а в одному спіні може випасти до 100 USDC. Також покажу свої результати та поясню, як додатково збільшити бонус. Біржа №1 - Bina

👍11🔥2

28 Aug 2026, 16:09 UTC689 views50 reactionsread 29 August 2026

Але важливо, що великого обвалу немає. За попередні вісім торгових сесій американські спотові Bitcoin-ETF отримали близько $2,8 млрд припливу, тому під ринком зараз є реальний попит. Для Ethereum та альткоїнів ризик вищий. Їм значно більше потрібні низькі ставки, слабкий долар і надлишкова ліквідність. Якщо ФРС дійсно підвищить ставку, а дворічна дохідність продовжить рости, альткоїни, швидше за все, відчують більши

🔥30👍163👻1

28 Aug 2026, 16:09 UTC589 views28 reactionsread 29 August 2026

🇺🇸 Ворш у Jackson Hole: ФРС ще не задоволена інфляцією. Ризик підвищення ставки у вересні різко зріс #Macro Кевін Ворш завершив свій перший великий виступ у Jackson Hole як голова ФРС. І головний сигнал для ринку досить чіткий: останні хороші CPI та PCE його поки не переконали, що інфляція впевнено повертається до цілі 2%. Ворш визнав, що літні дані по інфляції були кращими. Але водночас заявив, що вони не показуют

👍19🔥63

28 Aug 2026, 10:31 UTC382 views17 reactionsread 29 August 2026

🔶 Найважливіша valuation Поточна Market Cap: ≈$4,4–4,6 млрд. Annualized network burn: ≈$590 млн. Отже gross: P/Burn ≈7,5–7,8× і: gross burn yield ≈13% Market Cap/рік. Для L1 це дешево. Але після issuance: $69,4M mint − $49,1M burn ≈ $20,4M net inflation / 30d. Тому сьогодні правильний valuation question не: “Canton коштує лише 7× fees, чому не 20×?” а: “Коли burn стабільно перевищить mint?” Оце фун

🔥11👍41🤝1

28 Aug 2026, 10:31 UTC291 views17 reactionsread 29 August 2026

🔶 ETF — тут Canton вже попереду більшості альтів Ще одна річ, яка дуже важлива. 21Shares Canton Network ETF — TCAN — уже реально торгується на Nasdaq з 7 травня 2026. Станом на 25 серпня: AUM ≈ $7,67 млн. Це плюс: регульований TradFi channel уже існує. Але $7,7 млн проти CC Market Cap ~$4,5 млрд — це всього близько: 0,17% Market Cap. Тобто поки ETF не створює серйозного структурного bid. Окремо Grayscale

🔥11👍41🤝1

28 Aug 2026, 10:31 UTC251 views17 reactionsread 29 August 2026

🔶 Токеноміка Ось де CC максимально незвичайний. Немає: ICO pre-sale VC token round team allocation класичного vesting calendar. Офіційна документація прямо говорить: усі CC зароблені через network utility; premine та VC allocation не було. Це величезний плюс. Але: “немає VC unlocks” ≠ “немає supply pressure”. Current forecast DefiLlama: Application rewards ≈109,8 млн CC/тиждень Validator rewards ≈21,

🔥12👍4🤝1

28 Aug 2026, 10:31 UTC299 views16 reactionsread 29 August 2026

🔶 Fees ≠ revenue ≠ holder cash flow Тут треба правильно називати речі. Gross network fees: ≈ $49 млн / 30d. Direct cash revenue CC holder: $0. Indirect holder value accrual: ≈ $49 млн / 30d через burn. Тобто власнику CC ніхто не переводить USDC. Але кожен долар public-network usage створює структурний buy-pressure через необхідність CC + permanent supply destruction. На поточній market cap: annualized gross b

🔥11👍4🤝1

28 Aug 2026, 10:31 UTC427 views16 reactionsread 29 August 2026

Огляд проекту Canton Network (CC) — Wall Street уже реально працює on-chain. Але чи заробить на цьому власник CC? #оглядкриптопроектів 🔶 Про що проєкт Canton Network — це Layer 1, створений не для мемів, NFT або мільйонів retail-гаманців. Його задача набагато дорожча: перенести міжбанківські розрахунки, repo, collateral, токенізовані облігації, депозити та інші ринки капіталу on-chain так, щоб банки не були змуше

🔥11👍5

28 Aug 2026, 10:31 UTC605 views29 reactionsread 29 August 2026

🔶 Думка Після цього research моя думка про CC краща, ніж була набагато раніше. Бо дві речі реально змінилися. Перша: burn/mint convergence йде набагато швидше, ніж передбачав старий bearish thesis. 71% на 30d і майже 88% на останній добі — це вже не “токеноміка безнадійно зламана”. Друга: вчора Canton отримав один із найсильніших production proofs у всьому institutional crypto: sovereign digital bond → Tradew

🔥16👍10🤝21

28 Aug 2026, 08:38 UTC563 views28 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

🟡Експериментальний портфель🟡 #криптопортфель Проект створений суто для новачків. Які не розуміють як треба інвестувати з мінімальними сумами. Сюди будемо купувати або кожного дня або через день, мінімальна сума в місяць витрачатиметься від 150 до максимум 300 доларів. Дедлайн планується з прицілом щоб продати його на майбутньому булрані. Буду робити постійно скріни самої угоди на Байбіті (https://partner.bybit.com

👍19🔥71🤝1

28 Aug 2026, 08:29 UTC544 views27 reactionsread 29 August 2026

перероблю актуальний аналіз в нашому вже сформувавшомуся єдиному стилі, цієї монети - Canton. Тому чекайте сьогодні на поста. І одразу головний апдейт: старий негативний thesis по токеноміці CC частково застарів. У липневому research головна претензія була, що mint приблизно у 2,1–2,3 раза перевищує burn. Зараз такого розриву вже немає: за останні 30 днів burn покриває близько 71% issuance, а на останній добі доходи

🤝19👌5🔥3

28 Aug 2026, 07:27 UTC593 views53 reactionsread 29 August 2026

📊Огляд ринку на 28.08.2026 Біткоін сьогодні вночі зробив свіп минулого локального хаю та доходив до позначки 81478, зараз у момент написання торгується на 79727 Індекс страху та жадібності - 73 Капіталізація крипторинка - $2,66 трлн. Капіталізація крипторинка без BTC, ETH - $0,757 трлн. Домінація біткоїну - 60.20% Вцілому ми вчора передбачали похід на 81200, але длоя побальшого зростання не закрилися вище хоча б н

👍41🤝64🔥2

Showing the 12 most recent of 167 posts we hold for @it_statti. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@it_statti edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
20 August 2026
Most recent edit
20 August 2026

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 2 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ITstatti - Заробіток в інтернеті | Криптовалюта | Інвестиції” (@it_statti), 9,577 subscribers as measured 2 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/it_statti.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.