Channel
@italian_may
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
310subscribers
+24 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001430602099 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @italian_may |
| Created | 1 December 2020 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/italian_may |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 22 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 35% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Sept 2026, 13:16 | 310 | +8 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 06:00 | 302 | +14 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 14:26 | 288 | +3 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 14:07 | 285 | -1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 08:19 | 286 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 11:59 | 286 | first reading |
17 posts held, back to 17 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 1 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Чтобы два раза не вставать (хотя кого я обманываю). Цинично-капиталистический характер всей этой движухи даже не скрывается. OpenAI в своем жизнерадостном постинге сразу называет цену вопроса — 2к доллáров, как говорил мой школьный учитель математики, стоило бы решить эти задачи. Завтра токены покрупнее, но по пять. Далее. Вроде как раздают сто тысяч бесплатных подписок на флагманскую модель рисерчерам по всему миру,…
Вероятно, у меня неплохая интуиция на задачи, которые будут сделаны в ближайшее время. Буквально два дня назад думал, что должны найти пример несофической группы. Это знаменитый вопрос Громова и одна из главных открытых проблем теории групп. Была. Конструкция, судя по всему, использует малоизвестную статью 1962 года по теории колец малоизвестного американского алгебраиста William G. Leavitt. И сколько таких раскопок…
В полку прибыло, на этот раз довольно известный алгебраический геометр Влад Лазич. Заканчивает прямым обвинением: I actively resist disgraceful attempts by several mathematicians, including at least three Fields medallists, to destroy our discipline from the inside. I actively resist efforts by corporate interests to co-opt our discipline in order to legitimise their business interests.
Брайан Грин на церемонии открытия ICM рассказывает забавное: Джеймс Гарфилд, двадцатый президент США, за пять лет до вступления в должность опубликовал в New England Journal of Education оригинальное доказательство теоремы Пифагора. А начинается всё фразой "...we think it something on which the members of both houses can unite without distinction of party."
эффектно вышел в окно возможностей
Интересно, как скоро образуются сообщества математиков-луддитов? Злые языки, правда, поговаривают, что AI просто передоказал какой-то важный результат Дюминиль-Копана (предыдущий филдсовский медалист, если что) в более общем виде и гораздо более простым способом…
встречаемся в русишес ресторан «Жар-Птица» я буду в перьях центре зала
Венский пивоавтомат не выдал мне пиво. Восстание машин.
по итогам с определенностью можно заключить только одно — теперь я не могу сказать, что никогда не видел как голая 60-летняя женщина пять минут хлещет себя по влагалищу сырой говяжей печенью
коротко о планах на вечер
friendly reminder
в моменте, нареч. (зумерск./инфоцыганск.) 1. «В тот (или данный) момент» Пример употребления: В моменте у нас была селёдка на стопе (юная официантка кафе «Борщ», г. Ереван)
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @italian_may. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Пепел Грамши” (@italian_may), 310 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/italian_may.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.