Engagement
4 posts held, back to 25 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 134.5%
- avg views ÷ 66 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 88.8
- 4 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 4
- of 4 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Recent posts
25 Aug 2026, 19:31 UTC95 viewsread 26 August 2026 Forwarded from @searchyouontheraveeeVideo
раз начали говорить об этой девочке, решила тоже добавить нашу переписку, буду говорить сразу про главные предъявы, потому что про неё уже пост не первый и я думаю вам объяснять не надо как она работает.
1. про авито доставку я упоминала ей мельком, тогда она ничего не сказала против, но когда пришло время оплаты и я спросила насчёт создания объявления на авито - сказала, что на авито она не продаёт.
2. учитывая скол…
25 Aug 2026, 19:31 UTC90 viewsread 26 August 2026 Forwarded from @searchyouontheraveeePhoto
Доброй ночи, в один очень прекрасный день я решила купить «лицемер» кинула пост и стала ждать. Мне написала вот эта особа говори «вот у меня есть давай купишь только к Авито доступ потерян» думаю ну ладно все бывает, говорю ей давай через почту России отправишь она соглашается мы с ней все обговариваем вроде бы все идет хорошо, вот немножко за бирку придралась но потом в Инете полазила нашла похожие и смирилась. Вот …
25 Aug 2026, 19:31 UTC86 viewsread 26 August 2026 Forwarded from @searchyouontheraveeePhoto
1. @krummbix
2.я хотел купить обложку на паспорт гспд, мне написал человек с предложением купить у него эту обложку. я согласился и купил как раз эту обложку у него, прошло несколько дней и никто не отправил никакую обложку, человек этот не отвечает мне несколько дней и увидел то что было несколько жалоб на этого человека за скам
3. скрин профиля я предоставил как и доки все, тут еще скрины и видео одного человека у …
25 Aug 2026, 19:31 UTC84 viewsread 26 August 2026 Forwarded from @searchyouontheraveeePhoto
Меня добавили в чат, где распродается мерч смн, где девочка продаёт их по низкой цене. Я все же решил ей написать в личку, уточнить есть ли джерси смн. На что она ответила мне конечно есть, и вскоре мы начали торговаться по цене, в начале я предложил 12к, потому что раритет, но повысил через минуту за 15, все таки как не как оно уже нигде не продаётся. Она согласилась на цену за 15к. Первую предоплату я ей отправил в…
Showing the 4 most recent of 4 posts we hold for @itnrskam. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“наебалово итнр // скам” (@itnrskam), 66 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/itnrskam.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
