Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Розыгрыши Межгорода

Channel

Розыгрыши Межгорода

@itogispb

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

7,844subscribers

-419 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003292051785
TypeChannel
Username@itogispb
CreatedBetween 1 October 2025 and 28 February 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live31 August 2026
Measurements held10
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 31 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/itogispb

Growth

7,8448,3448,0946 August 2026 — 8,263 subscribers6 August 2026 — 8,260 subscribers9 August 2026 — 8,302 subscribers12 August 2026 — 8,295 subscribers16 August 2026 — 8,200 subscribers19 August 2026 — 8,269 subscribers22 August 2026 — 8,344 subscribers25 August 2026 — 8,273 subscribers28 August 2026 — 8,068 subscribers31 August 2026 — 7,844 subscribers6 August 202631 August 2026
10 measurements spanning 25 days, net -419. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 7,769–8,419 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
31 Aug 2026, 22:377,844-224
28 Aug 2026, 19:068,068-205
25 Aug 2026, 19:058,273-71
22 Aug 2026, 10:148,344+75
19 Aug 2026, 09:468,269+69
16 Aug 2026, 08:378,200-95
12 Aug 2026, 22:338,295-7
9 Aug 2026, 17:038,302+42
6 Aug 2026, 22:558,260-3
6 Aug 2026, 19:498,263first reading

Engagement

38 posts held, back to 27 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 26 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
11.9%
avg views ÷ 7,844 subscribers
Avg views / post
930
20 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.17%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
20
of 38 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 19 of 20 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 August 2026
Posts held38 (27 June 202628 August 2026)
Views total18,598
Reactions total206
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken28 Aug 2026, 18:10 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

374 reactions across 37 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 48.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
18248.7%
🔥10628.3%
🎉349.09%
👍236.15%
👎143.74%
👏82.14%
😁61.60%
🥰10.267%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 37 of the 38 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 374 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 38 most recent posts we hold, published 27 June 2026 to 28 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

28 Aug 2026, 06:26 UTC173 views3 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

✨ Разыгрываем 2 билета на органный концерт Выберем одного победителей и подарим два билета на концерт «Орган при свечах» в Петрикирхе. Дата: 4 сентября. Чтобы участвовать, выполните простые условия: 1. Подпишитесь на наш канал: — Питер за 300 — Центр Петербурга 2. Нажмите кнопку «Участвую» ниже! Итоги подведём 2 сентября в 10:00 в канале @itogispb. Всем удачи ⭐️

🔥2😁1

27 Aug 2026, 07:23 UTC514 views5 reactionsread 28 August 2026

🎉 Результаты розыгрыша: Победитель: 1. Ganfffesw Werravis

👎4👏1

24 Aug 2026, 12:09 UTC631 views28 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

✨ Разыгрываем 2 билета на органный концерт Выберем одного победителей и подарим два билета на концерт «Орган ТОП 10» в Петрикирхе. Дата: 28 августа Чтобы участвовать, выполните простые условия: 1. Подпишитесь на наш канал: — Мой Город Питер — Молния Питер 2. Нажмите кнопку «Участвую» ниже! Итоги подведём 27 августа в 10:00 в канале @itogispb. Всем удачи ⭐️

25🔥2👏1

21 Aug 2026, 07:07 UTC≈1,090 views4 reactionsread 28 August 2026

🎉 Результаты розыгрыша: Победитель: 1. Maxim Verskiy (@faxverskiy) 2. Андриана (@AndrianaPS) Проверить результаты

👍2👎1👏1

20 Aug 2026, 08:03 UTC≈1,240 views4 reactionsread 28 August 2026

🎉 Результаты розыгрыша: Победитель: 1. Алексей (@Dk_Alexey) 2. Юлия (@Juliettation716) 3. Софушка (@so_kary_fi)

👎2👍1👏1

19 Aug 2026, 08:10 UTC989 views21 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

Разыгрываем 6 билетов на концерт «Воровайки» Выберем трех победителей и подарим по два билета на концерт в Руки Вверх бар. Чтобы участвовать, выполните простые условия: 1. Подпишитесь на наш канал: — Лиговка | Петербург 2. Нажмите кнопку «Участвую» ниже! Итоги подведём 20 августа в 10:00 в канале @itogispb. Всем удачи ⭐️

🔥21

19 Aug 2026, 07:39 UTC878 views1 reactionsread 28 August 2026

🎉 Результаты розыгрыша: Победитель: 1. Вероника (@NikkaVi) Проверить результаты

👏1

18 Aug 2026, 14:15 UTC727 views25 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Forwarded from @spb_for2Photo

Разыгрываем 4 билета на представление «Цирк на Льду» ⛸ Выберем двух победителей и подарим по два билета в цирк. Чтобы участвовать, выполните простые условия: 1. Подпишитесь на наш канал: — Для Двоих Петербург 2. Нажмите кнопку «Участвую» ниже! Итоги подведём 21 августа в 10:00 в канале @itogispb. Всем удачи ⭐️

🔥25

18 Aug 2026, 14:07 UTC797 views3 reactionsread 28 August 2026

🎉 Результаты розыгрыша: Победитель: 1. DRΞVIXOR (@drevixor) 2. Марина Тютюнникова 3. Nadezhdaiam (@Nadezhdaiam) 4. Ирина Ми (@Irinamiha13) Проверить результаты

🎉21

18 Aug 2026, 10:01 UTC646 views25 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Forwarded from @spb_korushkaPhoto

Разыгрываем 2 билета на Гарри Поттера. Музыкальное шоу в Планетарии 1! Выберем одного победителя и подарим два билета на шоу. Дата: 20 августа Чтобы участвовать, выполните простые условия: 1. Подпишитесь на наш канал: — Корюшка 2. Нажмите кнопку «Участвую» ниже! Итоги подведём 19 августа в 10:00 в канале @itogispb. Всем удачи ⭐️

21🔥4

16 Aug 2026, 07:37 UTC722 views14 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Forwarded from @spb_for2Photo

Разыгрываем 4 билета в Музей «Вселенная Воды» Выберем четырех победителей и подарим каждому билет, по которому смогут пройти 5 человек в музей. Чтобы участвовать, выполните простые условия: 1. Подпишитесь на наши каналы: — Для Двоих Петербург — Питер за 300 2. Нажмите кнопку «Участвую» ниже! Итоги подведём 18 августа в 10:00 в канале @itogispb. Всем удачи ⭐️

10🔥4

14 Aug 2026, 07:26 UTC≈1,090 views3 reactionsread 28 August 2026

🎉 Результаты розыгрыша: Победитель: 1. Анна 2. Алексей Усов (@AlexRTW) Проверить результаты

👏2👎1

Showing the 12 most recent of 38 posts we hold for @itogispb. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 68,337 of 1,629,571 entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 10 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 31 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Розыгрыши Межгорода” (@itogispb), 7,844 subscribers as measured 31 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/itogispb.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.