Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ITPOD

Channel

ITPOD

@itpod_com

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

88subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002384139099
TypeChannel
Username@itpod_com
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live30 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 30 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/itpod_com

Growth

878887.58 August 2026 — 88 subscribers9 August 2026 — 88 subscribers15 August 2026 — 87 subscribers30 August 2026 — 88 subscribers8 August 202630 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 21 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 87–88 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
30 Aug 2026, 04:0688+1
15 Aug 2026, 17:3487-1
9 Aug 2026, 15:3288no change
8 Aug 2026, 21:0188first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 15 May 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1m 33s
Average length
1m 33s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

184 reactions across 18 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥6133.2%
👍5731.0%
❤‍🔥3619.6%
115.98%
52.72%
🆒52.72%
🏆31.63%
💯21.09%
🤓21.09%
👀10.543%
😍10.543%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 184 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 15 May 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

5 Aug 2026, 11:53 UTC38 views11 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Posted without readable text

🔥6👍3❤‍🔥2

28 Jul 2026, 12:59 UTC56 views8 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Posted without readable text

👍4❤‍🔥2🔥1😍1

22 Jul 2026, 10:55 UTC69 views7 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

❓Какие задачи ПАК для ИИ от 🪵ITPOD решает лучше, чем классический подход? Спойлер: классический подход хорош для проверки гипотез. Для промышленной эксплуатации нужна платформа, которая уже учитывает все «взрослые» требования. Именно здесь ПАК показывает свою силу. Классический подход - это, по сути, самостоятельная работа. Компания принимает решение: «Нам нужна автоматизация». ИТ-отдел берётся за дело: подбирают

👍32❤‍🔥2

16 Jul 2026, 11:59 UTC72 views11 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

🪵 Сервер для видеоаналитики на 100+ камер: три типа задач, реальная математика GPU и почему EPYC + DDR4 выгоднее Выбрать сервер для видеоаналитики вслепую - значит переплатить или недополучить производительность. Мы разобрали три типовые задачи и показали, как одна платформа ITPOD‑SYR4108G‑D12R‑G3 с восемью NVIDIA RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell закрывает объект на 280 камер. Три сценария - три требования к GPU: 🔹 Детекция

👍5❤‍🔥3🔥3

14 Jul 2026, 12:29 UTC59 views11 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

JBOF - это не просто корзина для дисков. Это три способа пересобрать инфраструктуру. Когда серверное хранилище становится узким местом, мы привыкли менять серверы. Дорого, долго, радикально. А что, если проблему решает JBOF (Just a Bunch Of Flash) - внешняя полка с NVMe, которая подключается к существующим узлам? Разбираем 3 рабочих сценария, где JBOF дает результат быстрее, чем закупка новых серверов. 🔹 Сценарий 1

3🏆3👍3❤‍🔥1🔥1

10 Jul 2026, 08:14 UTC71 views13 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Один сервер вместо пяти: 🪵ITPOD представляет платформу ITPOD-SL401-D60R-G4. Петабайт данных на классических 2U-серверах (по 12 дисков LFF) - это пять корпусов, 10 юнитов в стойке и в 5 раз больше точек отказа. Тот же петабайт можно упаковать всего в один корпус 4U, если это платформа ITPOD-SL401-D60R-G4. ⚡️⚡️⚡️Сервер вмещает до 60 дисков LFF объёмом до 24 ТБ каждый. Плотность размещения дисков в 2,5 раза выше, че

🔥5❤‍🔥4👍4

9 Jul 2026, 08:25 UTC65 views15 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @vas_expertsVideo

Video, posted without a caption

🔥8👍4❤‍🔥2🆒1

9 Jul 2026, 08:25 UTC67 views8 reactionsread 9 August 2026

🔥🔥🔥Новый обзор сервера 🪵 ITPOD-MSR201-S06R-10P (PCIe 4.0) от нашего технологического партнера 🧑‍💻VAS Experts. Это специализированный сервер, подходящий под стойки с ограниченной глубиной. Форм-фактор и глубина: 2U, глубина всего 450 мм. Это главная особенность, делающая его "укороченным". Что позволяет устанавливать его в неглубокие телекоммуникационные стойки и шкафы, где стандартные серверы ЦОД просто не помещают

👍3🔥32

7 Jul 2026, 12:01 UTC67 views9 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Когда компания решает внедрить ИИ, первое, что приходит в голову: «Нужен мощный сервер с видеокартами». Его покупают или арендуют в облаке, радуются, а через пару месяцев проект либо встаёт, либо счета за облако вырастают в разы. Почему? Эксперты 🪵ITPOD (корпорация ITG) называют две типичные ошибки в расчётах, которые превращают экономичный пилот в финансовый кошмар. ❌ Ошибка №1. Забыли про место под солнцем (и охл

🔥4👍32

16 Jun 2026, 13:55 UTC110 views9 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

При строительстве современных ЦОД госсектор, промышленность и другие игроки корпоративного рынка все чаще выбирают Direct Free Cooling (прямое естественное охлаждение). И это не дань моде, а жесткая экономическая необходимость. 🔍 В чем суть? Раньше мы боролись за КПД ИБП (сейчас он достиг 96–99%), но основной пожиратель энергии сместился. Теперь это охлаждение. На фоне роста нагрузок AI/HPC традиционные подходы к о

❤‍🔥5👍3🔥1

11 Jun 2026, 13:10 UTC102 views8 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Основные риски отсутствия ИИ-платформы и почему компаниям стоит задуматься о внедрении? Мнение🪵 ITPOD (корпорация ITG) Сейчас уже сложно представить себе рабочие процессы без использования ИИ-технологий. Однако многие компании всё еще предпочитают покупать сотрудникам подписки на ChatGPT и аналоги, а не внедрять собственн

👍3🔥3❤‍🔥2

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @itpod_com. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 30 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ITPOD” (@itpod_com), 88 subscribers as measured 30 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/itpod_com.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.