Channel
@itsecby
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1,367subscribers
+18 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001529895252 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @itsecby |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 11 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/itsecby |
Hacking & security — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 17 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 83% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Sept 2026, 06:17 | 1,367 | +4 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 09:36 | 1,363 | +1 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 07:40 | 1,362 | -2 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 01:02 | 1,364 | +6 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 00:04 | 1,358 | +3 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 19:08 | 1,355 | +4 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 12:38 | 1,351 | -2 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 02:29 | 1,353 | +5 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 05:12 | 1,348 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 22:21 | 1,349 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 21:29 | 1,349 | first reading |
17 posts held, back to 28 February 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 24 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
https://www.linkedin.com/posts/viacheslavaksionov_%D1%81%D0%B5%D0%B3%D0%BE%D0%B4%D0%BD%D1%8F-%D1%81%D0%BE%D1%81%D1%82%D0%BE%D1%8F%D0%BB%D1%81%D1%8F-%D0%BD%D0%B0%D1%88-%D0%B1%D0%B5%D1%81%D0%BF%D0%BB%D0%B0%D1%82%D0%BD%D1%8B%D0%B9-%D0%BE%D0%BD%D0%BB%D0%B0%D0%B9%D0%BD-%D1%81%D0%B5%D0%BC%D0%B8%D0%BD%D0%B0%D1%80-ugcPost-7486343921036365824-vi9E/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=member_desktop&rcm=ACoAAAraZA0BlOmSsoElEaZHhGRQMni…
Photo, posted without a caption
Новые требования в области кибербезопасности начнут действовать с 1 июля. Поясняем новации https://belta.by/society/view/novye-trebovanija-v-oblasti-kiberbezopasnosti-nachnut-dejstvovat-s-1-ijulja-pojasnjaem-novatsii-784932-2026/
«Аспекты безопасности при использовании AI», Дмитрий Таран
«Корпоративных ИИ нет, а потребность использование есть. Что делать?», Вадим Курицкий
«Аудит безопасной эксплуатации ИИ в организации», Константин Добрянский
«Внедрение СМИБ в соответствии со стандартом ISO/IEC 27001:2022 (СТБ ISO/IEC 27001-2024)», Елизавета Кудина
Коллеги! Сегодня провели онлайн-семинара «Комплаенс и инновации: ISO 27001 & AI». Огромное спасибо и респектище спикерам за шеринг экспертизы и знаний! Спасибо участникам, которые не выступали с докладами но активно участвовали в обсуждении и делились экспертизой! В ближайшем будущем планируем выйти за пределы промпт-инжиниринга в семинаре «ИИ под капотом: как работает корпоративный ИИ-сервис», и разобрать вопросы а…
Cеминар «Комплаенс и инновации: ISO 27001 & AI» Пятница, 5 июня · 10:00–12:30 Часовой пояс: Europe/Minsk Контактная информация для встречи в Google Meet Ссылка на видеовстречу: https://meet.google.com/sfn-xbcm-ygw
Первым зарегистрировавшимся 90 участникам, на адрес электронной почты, указанный при регистрации, высланы ссылки на подключение. Просьба если знаете что не сможете принять участие отклоните встречу, чтобы коллеги, которые регистрировались после вас смогли получить приглашение. Также просьба подключиться за 10 минут до начала. т.к в 9:50 будет опубликована общая ссылка для всех
Подготовили с коллегами инструмент для проведения Аудита и оценки уровня зрелости системы информационной безопасности критически важного объекта информатизации в соответствии с требованиями законодательства. На стадии завершения находятся аналогичные инструменты для проведения Анализа эффективности применения системы защиты информации и Аудита кибербезопасности https://youtu.be/s1fiSgODEX4
Photo, posted without a caption
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @itsecby. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“itsec.by” (@itsecby), 1,367 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/itsecby.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.