Channel
@itseemstobe
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
771subscribers
+5 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001375067782 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @itseemstobe |
| Created | 11 November 2019 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 28 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 28 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/itseemstobe |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 28 Aug 2026, 04:25 | 771 | +1 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 12:16 | 770 | +2 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 01:39 | 768 | +2 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 15:49 | 766 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 13:57 | 766 | first reading |
10 posts held, back to 18 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 10 posts for this entry, the most recent from 27 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
109 reactions across 9 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 47.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 52 | 47.7% | |
| 🔥 | 44 | 40.4% | |
| 👍 | 10 | 9.17% | |
| 🤯 | 3 | 2.75% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 109reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 18 April 2026 to 27 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
про будущее ничего не понятно, но это не повод про него не думать. завтра модерирую онлайн-мастермайнд вместе с C-Growth, международным сообществом маркетинг-лидеров. тема: человекоцентричные продукты к 2030. приходите разобрать три кейса участников сообщества и об реальные задачи подумать, куда меняются продукты и пользовательский опыт в них. буду модерировать дискуссию и сам поделюсь наблюдениями из опыта создани…
🔥5❤3
кажется, закрыл одну из самых сложных нейминговых задач этого года (so far). Ваня Замесин объявил название своей авторской продуктовой методологии, так что now it’s official — Next Move Theory. Имя придумали мы в Kidults. Немного контекста: Next Move Theory — это Ванина разработка, которая выросла за пределы Advanced Jobs To Be Done и собрала в себе юнит-экономику, RAT, ABCDX, Теорию ограничений. Методология про то,…
❤12🔥9👍1
дал интервью Насте Карповой про запуск проектов на глобальных рынках полная версия https://t.me/karpovaventures/2065?single
❤2👍2
В субботу снова буду в Берлине. Приезжаю провести Open.Space вместе с дуэжественным фондом Yellow Rocks. Из всех конференций и деловых активностей Open.Space — это мой любимый формат: — два дня интенсивной работы над запросами участников; — крутой состав участников-предпринимателей с уникальным и очень богатым жизненным опытом; — можно принести свой запрос и получить буст, можно ходить по секциям, помогать другим и н…
❤3🔥1
в последние месяцы прокачал экспертизу в тестирвоании продуктовых гипотез и извелечении полезной информации об аудитории из рекламных тестов. Венчурным инвесторо Денисо Калышкин, позвал рассказать про это и вместе разобрать кейсы участников его комьюнити
Как тестировать CAC на старте: деньги в трубу или первые клиенты? Для стартапа стоимость привлечения клиента — чёрный ящик. Можно слить весь бюджет на рекламу… а можно найти первых платящих за 500 евро. Вопрос не в том, сколько вы готовы потратить. Главное - как понять эффективность на самом раннем этапе . 📍 4 июня, в 19:00 CEST Проведём открытый разговор с практиком, который запустил более 30 продуктов. 🎤 Спикер: …
❤7🔥2
акт самооблечения через художественное (?) высказывание. Выставку "Pусский императив" в петербургском Манеже открыли Пиотровские. Отец, директор Эрмитажа и автор фразы «Все мы милитаристы и имперцы. Война — это самоутверждение нации» и его сын, вице-губернатор по культуре. сначала я был уверен, что это фейк, но сегодняшняя росийская действительность оказалась фейковей любого фейка. А выставка — легендарный памятник …
❤8🤯3
настроил интеграцию Клода с ноушеном и дефолтовой to doшкой Reminder на маке. Пойду отдыхать. хороших выходных
👍7❤4
а потом еще классно побегали вдоль моря
❤13🔥4
провел мастермайнд бизнес-клуба Елизаветы Осетинской The Chat. 20 предпринимателей с идеями и невероятным суммарным опытом, помогали друг другу, посмотреть на задачи с другой стороны, найти конкретные решения для следующих шагов в развитии. Очень люблю мастерманйды и опен-спейсы, невероятное сочетание интеллектуальной работы, новых знаний и инсайтов и радости о того, что принес пользу
🔥23
Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @itseemstobe. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 758,663 of 1,626,935entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 28 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“кажется,” (@itseemstobe), 771 subscribers as measured 28 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/itseemstobe.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.