Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 17 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
13 measurements spanning 35 days, net +333. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,210–1,701 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
15 Sept 2026, 05:16
1,644
+121
11 Sept 2026, 03:58
1,523
+12
6 Sept 2026, 08:56
1,511
+3
2 Sept 2026, 05:46
1,508
+19
30 Aug 2026, 11:05
1,489
+83
27 Aug 2026, 19:53
1,406
+37
24 Aug 2026, 15:15
1,369
+98
20 Aug 2026, 13:04
1,271
+4
17 Aug 2026, 22:56
1,267
-7
15 Aug 2026, 01:57
1,274
-36
11 Aug 2026, 14:12
1,310
-1
11 Aug 2026, 14:00
1,311
no change
11 Aug 2026, 13:47
1,311
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 15 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 11 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
1,074 reactions across 18 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 22.1% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤🔥
237
22.1%
👍
199
18.5%
❤
169
15.7%
💋
169
15.7%
💘
143
13.3%
😭
66
6.15%
💔
42
3.91%
💅
22
2.05%
🍓
21
1.96%
😨
3
0.279%
🦄
3
0.279%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,074 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 15 July 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
13
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 18 we hold a reading for · 11%
Most on one post
12
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @itsminnielife. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 15 July 2026 to 11 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
حق هویت و بیان جنسیتی
"The Right to Gender Identity and Gender Expression"
>جامعهای که به هویت و بیان جنسیتی افراد بدون تبعیض احترام میذاره جامعهای هستش که آدم ها میتونن بدون ترس از تبعیض و خشونت هم از طرف مردم هم از طرف جامعه خود واقعیشون باشن
—
هویت جنسیتی(Sex) یکی از بخش های مهم هویت هر انسانی هستش که به احساس درونی افراد نسبت به جنسیت خودشون مربوطه و این هویت ممکنه با جنسیتی که هنگام تولد به اون فرد نسبت داده…
Btw.... مهم اینه طنین کنسل شد
"تبریک به ترنس ها"
یه ترنس ترنسفوب،زن ستیز دیگه از کامیونیتی ما ترنس ها کنسل شد این تبریک داره؟
زمانی تبریک بگین که هیچ واژه ترنسفوبیک و زن ستیزانه ای حین کنسل شدن یه زن ترنس یا زن سیس نبینیم
نه مثل امروز که طنین داشت کنسل میشد ده برابر قبل مردم ترنسفوب و زن ستیز بودن و راجب هویت و بدن ترنسا چرت و پرت میگفتن
یه بار دیگه به ترنس کامیونیتی ثابت شد تا وقتی که بقیه از ترنس ها بدشون نیاد ترنسفوب نیستن، ولی وقتی یکی یه حرفی میزنه ترنسفوب میشن
دارید طنین رو کنسل میکنید کمتر راجب بدن و هویت افراد ترنس چرت و پرت تفت بدید جدی خیلی احمقید؟؟! خب هستید دیگه،عقل جهان هزارمی
طنین درسته ترنس میسیژانیستیک و زن ستیزه ولی این دلیل نمیشه بیاید با دد نیمش میسجندرش کنین
ولی قبل تایپ کردن یه کم فکر کنین چه چیزشعری میخاید بنویسید بعد شروع به ن…
🏳️⚧️ Minnie (Queerism) pinned «تاریخچه ای کوتاه از مبارزه زنان در تاریخ "A Brief History of Women's Struggle for Their Rights" مبارزه زنان برای به دست آوردن حقوق زنان تاریخچه ای طولانی داره که در دورههای مختلف زنان برای دستیابی به کمترین حقشون مثل: حقوق سیاسی،اقتصادی،اجتماعی و آموزشی…»
تاریخچه ای کوتاه از مبارزه زنان در تاریخ
"A Brief History of Women's Struggle for Their Rights"
مبارزه زنان برای به دست آوردن حقوق زنان تاریخچه ای طولانی داره که در دورههای مختلف زنان برای دستیابی به کمترین حقشون مثل: حقوق سیاسی،اقتصادی،اجتماعی و آموزشی تلاش کردن و در بسیاری از جوامع گذشته، زنان از حق رای دادن،تحصیل،مالکیت، مشارکت سیاسی،پوشش، و تصمیمگیری مستقل درباره زندگی و بدن خودشون محروم بودن
جنبش های فمینیستی…
اگه "توجه" رو از حرفاتون بگیرن چیزی برای گفتن ندارید
کل کارایی که کردید رو یه لیبل "من که کاری نکردم" میچسبونید و تموم شد رفت؟! اوه چه احمق هایی هستید شماها
در حالی که همه دارن گوه کاریاتونو میبینن
کسی داره بهم میگه توجه دوست دارم که از کون گوهی بودن دوستاش دیفند میکنه و کل متناشون هم هست btw
اره خب من بارها گفتم توجه دوست دارم
At least I'm honest about it💋🩵
At least I'm not ashamed of it
Stay mad
Cry about it yeahhh…
خیلی خنده داره احمق بودن آدمارو تو یه بحثی ببینی که تمومی نداره
حتی زمانی که ترنسفوبیا،Misogynist و هموفوبیا موج میزنه از وجود گوهیشون و مثل نقل و نبات 24 ساعت کارشون یوز دادن اسلر و ریپ جوکه
وقتایی که چیزی برای گفتن ندارن رو میارن به توهین به هویت افراد و میسجندر کردنشون و با عقل Corrupt n misogynistic شون و با یه "ما که چیزی نگفتیم" تمومش میکنن میره
احمق تر کسایی که "دوستاشونن" و از کارای ویردشون دیفند میکنن
U gott…
"Non-binary"
افراد نانباینری
به افرادی نان باینری میگن که هویت جنسیتی اونها خارج از چارچوب مرد/زن قرار میگیره
خیلی از افراد نان باینری از هردو ضمیر برای ایدنیفای کردن استفاده میکنن و برخی خارج از چارچوب و بعضی ها بین دوتا ضمیر و بعضی هاهم ترکیبی استفاده میکنن نانباینری همونطور که گفته شد یکی از هویت جنسیتیه و با گرایش جنسی افراد فرق داره،یک فرد نانباینری میتونه هموسکشوال باشه،بایسکشوال باشه،پنسکشوال باشه،اسکشوال…
تا وقتی بحث بدن زنها،حق زنها و امنیت زنهاست، همه ساکتن.. اما همین که پای مردها وسط میاد، یهو همه کارشناس میشن
زنستیزی بحران اقتصادی نیست، بهونه کردن اقتصاد برای کماهمیت جلوه دادن خشونت علیه زنها فقط یعنی نمیخواید درباره خودِ زنستیزی حرف بزنید چون فقط ازش نمیترسید!
هر بار حرف از زنها میشه، یه عده سریع بحث رو میچرخونن سمت خودشون،دنیا قرار نیست هر بار که زنان از تبعیض میگن، روی شما زوم کنه و توجه بده بهتون و ا…
"حقوق سکسوورکرها"
سکسوورک Sex Work
به افرادی سکس وورکر گفته میشه که خدمات جنسی(sexual services) ارائه میکنن و برای این کار پول و خیلی چیز های دیگه دریافت میکنن
در خیلی از کشورها نگرشهای اجتماعی و قوانین نسبت به سکسورک کاملا متفاوته.. برخی کشورها این کار رو جرمانگاری کردن و برخی شغل سکس وورک رو قانونی و همچنین تحت نظارت قرار دادن
در کنار تمام این اختلافها "حقوق سکسوورکرها" به یکی از مباحث مهم حقوق بشر تبدیل …
خواستم ازتون تشکر کنم که کنارم بودین این چند روز
واقعا حالم رو بهتر کردید و کنارم بودین با وجود اینهمه مشکلات، اگه نبودید یک درصد هم نمیدونم کی خوب میشدم.. و خیلی دوستتون دارم🫂🩵
💋35❤6🍓3💘3😭3👍2
Signed 𝑀𝒾𝓃𝓃𝒾𝑒
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @itsminnielife. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Minnie (Queerism)” (@itsminnielife), 1,644 subscribers as measured 15 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/itsminnielife.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
