Channel
@itss_lanaa
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Stars · Posts · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
7,980subscribers
-692 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001563858889 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @itss_lanaa |
| Description | • بَيـت الفَـراشات الخاصّ بـِي 𐀔 • لكنني نقي مثل حبّي ، مثل يأسِي☀️. 𝒔𝒊𝒕𝒆 •|| @Lannosht39BOT |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 5 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 25 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 5 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/itss_lanaa |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 76% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 5 Nov 2026, 20:41 | 7,980 | -23 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 04:45 | 8,003 | -22 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 00:26 | 8,025 | -22 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 04:07 | 8,047 | -24 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 20:09 | 8,071 | -16 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 20:20 | 8,087 | -23 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 12:20 | 8,110 | -22 |
| 15 Oct 2026, 16:27 | 8,132 | -21 |
| 12 Oct 2026, 23:15 | 8,153 | -38 |
| 6 Oct 2026, 14:42 | 8,191 | -52 |
| 29 Sept 2026, 21:40 | 8,243 | -80 |
| 19 Sept 2026, 14:57 | 8,323 | -36 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 20:37 | 8,359 | -38 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 23:17 | 8,397 | -39 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 09:18 | 8,436 | -39 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 15:23 | 8,475 | -20 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 00:34 | 8,495 | -15 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 17:02 | 8,510 | -24 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 20:03 | 8,534 | -39 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 09:35 | 8,573 | first reading |
47 posts held, back to 24 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 40 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 47 (24 June 2026 – 7 November 2026) |
| Views total | 4,184 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Nov 2026, 13:02 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @itss_lanaa. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 47 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 24 June 2026 to 7 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 20 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
أعتقد أن العالم سيظل فوضوياً للأبد وسأظل أنا فوضوياً للأبد . وربما تكون أنت فوضوياً أيضاً ولكني أؤمن أنه بإمكاننا أن نكون فوضويين وسعداء أو على الأقل ، بإمكاننا أن نكون فوضويين وأقل تعاسة .. قال كارل يونغ: "في كل فوضى هنالك كون، في كل اضطراب هنالك نظام خفي." الفوضى ليست أمراً سيئاً بالضرورة .
Signed 𝒍𝒂𝒏𝒂 ༊
أظن النبات و الزرايِع من ألطف الاشياء يلي ممكن تكون موجودة بأي بيت ، بعد الكتُب طبعاً 😔🪴
Signed 𝒍𝒂𝒏𝒂 ༊
I’ll wait for someone who makes me feel this way 😔♥️.
Signed 𝒍𝒂𝒏𝒂 ༊
" التقيتُ بك فتصالحتُ مع العالم، عفوتُ عن الغائبين، وعذرتُ كل الراحلين، منذ أن التقيتك وأنا أرى أن لا شيء يدعو للغضب إلا غيابك ♥️. " • من رسائل كافكا إلى ميلينا
Signed 𝒍𝒂𝒏𝒂 ༊
بدلاً من أن أجد شخصًا يشاركني ذوقي، أفضّل أن أجد شخصًا يُعلّمني أشياء لم أكن أعلم أنني أحبّها. • فريدريك نيتشه
Signed 𝒍𝒂𝒏𝒂 ༊
لا تموت فراشَات روحِي ، رُبّما تتعَب رُبّما تحزَن ربّما تتوقّف أجنحتَها عَن التحليقِ لفَترة وجيزة و هذا شَيء طبيعي جدّاً .. و لكن ثمّة أمل و قوّة و شَرارة مشتَعِلة تَعبثُ في زَوايا صَدري و لن تنطَفِأ ما دُمت حيّة ִֶָ ࣪⋆ .🦋.⋆ ִֶָ ࣪ • لانَا-٢٨-نوفَمبر
Signed 𝒍𝒂𝒏𝒂 ༊
💯.
Signed 𝒍𝒂𝒏𝒂 ༊
•
Signed 𝒍𝒂𝒏𝒂 ༊
كلما تعمقت في فهم السعادة، أدركت أنها تعود في جوهرها إلى أمر واحد : أن تعيش منسجماً مع ما يعني لك حقاً. ليست السعادة في النجاح، ولا في المقتنيات، بل في أن تحيا حياة تشبهك؛ حياة تستيقظ فيها ممتناً لأن هذا يومك، وتشعر أنك لو مُنحت فرصة الاختيار من جديد لاخترت حياتك نفسها دون تردد. أن يكون فرحك نابعاً منك، لا مستعاراً من رضا الآخرين، وأن لا تُعلّق قيمتك على الإنجاز القادم أو الهدف التالي. فحين تتوقف عن البحث عن نفسك في …
Signed 𝒍𝒂𝒏𝒂 ༊
وحدهم الذين مرّوا بأيامٍ قاسيةٍ جداً يكونون ألطف من الجميع.. لأنهم لا يريدون أن تتكرر مأساتهم في قلبٍ آخر. _بيتر كميل.
Signed 𝒍𝒂𝒏𝒂 ༊
anything .. anytime I'm always here ❤️
Signed 𝒍𝒂𝒏𝒂 ༊
💯.
Signed 𝒍𝒂𝒏𝒂 ༊
Showing the 12 most recent of 47 posts we hold for @itss_lanaa. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
We recorded 4 posts on @itss_lanaa as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 8 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“It's lana ▽” (@itss_lanaa), 7,980 subscribers as measured 5 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/itss_lanaa.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.