Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 5 October 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 94% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
32 measurements spanning 53 days, net +85,032. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 32
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
8 Nov 2026, 20:46
86,281
+1,100
7 Nov 2026, 13:31
85,181
+523
6 Nov 2026, 16:46
84,658
+578
5 Nov 2026, 16:25
84,080
+625
4 Nov 2026, 14:06
83,455
+679
3 Nov 2026, 14:56
82,776
+660
2 Nov 2026, 17:25
82,116
+1,743
1 Nov 2026, 15:34
80,373
+619
31 Oct 2026, 16:46
79,754
+539
30 Oct 2026, 17:28
79,215
+536
29 Oct 2026, 18:20
78,679
+565
28 Oct 2026, 19:00
78,114
+8
27 Oct 2026, 21:19
78,106
+502
26 Oct 2026, 21:41
77,604
+500
25 Oct 2026, 18:46
77,104
+1,007
23 Oct 2026, 19:27
76,097
+505
22 Oct 2026, 20:46
75,592
+478
21 Oct 2026, 19:57
75,114
+1,041
20 Oct 2026, 18:18
74,073
+422
19 Oct 2026, 16:19
73,651
first reading
Engagement
144 posts held, back to 13 September 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 85 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
41.1%
avg views ÷ 86,281 subscribers
Avg views / post
35,400
95 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.94%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
95
of 144 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 November 2026
Posts held
144 (13 September 2026 – 8 November 2026)
Views total
3,365,020
Reactions total
132,658
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
9 Nov 2026, 02:14 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
50
Videos
63
Links
30
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Video runtime
1h 00m
Average length
57s
Measured directly from 63 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
176,872 reactions across 142 posts, in 50 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 30.9% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
💯
54,661
30.9%
👍
31,243
17.7%
🔥
17,381
9.83%
❤
14,471
8.18%
🤝
11,665
6.60%
👌
10,012
5.66%
😢
8,283
4.68%
🤬
7,557
4.27%
😱
5,595
3.16%
😨
5,185
2.93%
👏
3,365
1.90%
👀
1,963
1.11%
🕊
1,675
0.947%
🎉
1,364
0.771%
😁
830
0.469%
😡
277
0.157%
🙏
182
0.103%
🤮
170
0.096%
😭
169
0.096%
🤣
153
0.087%
30 further kinds
671
0.379%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 142 of the 144 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 176,872 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 144 most recent posts we hold, published 13 September 2026 to 8 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 11 of 95 posts held from the last 30 days (11.6%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
Дівча відпрацьовує методички Офісу Зеленського. Ще один доказ того, що Зеленський напряму бенефітить від FirePoint. Вам щоразу розповідають, що в нас немає захисту саме через когось. Додуматися до того, що в усьому винен Маск на 5тий рік війни, походить від переконання Офісу президента в тому, що ви і так в усе повірите. Бо тих, хто розповідає правду, занадто мало. Кількість винних не закінчиться ніколи. І той, хто в…
Кожен виживає, як може. Українське телебачення -- не виняток. Диктатура завжди проходиться по журналістиці першими. Але кожен пропагандист потім відповідає на лаві з диктаторським режимом.
І ліві, і праві відзначають, наскільки вражаюче розумна Сара Вагенкнехт, лідерка німецької лівої партії BSW. Мала за честь провести таку плідну розмову з цією німецькою політичною лідеркою. Дякую європарламентарю Фабіо Де Масі
за організацію! Україна потребує миру — і західних лідерів, які допоможуть його досягти.
Рада можливості виступити в Бундестазі 4 листопада на панелі AfD «Швейцарія Сходу: бачення мирної України».
Найкращий шлях для України — нейтралітет: міст між Сходом і Заходом, а не постійна лінія фронту чи майбутнє членство в НАТО, яке розпалює цю війну, а не охолоджує її. Мир і процвітання — передусім.
Вдячна Тіно Крупалі, Хансу Неухоффу та Маркусу Фронмайєру за організацію події.
Чи вірите ви, що Володимир Зеленський не причетний до потоків зі спецоперації Карфаген?
Без нього не було б такого масштабу71%
Точно причетний, хоча б до частини36%
Він може бути ні при чому2%
Він не винен1%
The shares total 110%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Це людське обличчя цієї війни: літні, бідні пенсіонери, які отримують прапори замість дітей.
В Берліні я спілкувалася з журналістами провідних ЗМІ. Ця розмова дуже мене засмутила. Я вже розуміла, що вони дивитимуться на мене крізь стереотипи й шукатимуть приводи звинуватити. Здавалося, саме так вони й будували свої запитання від самого початку.
Один журналіст сказав, що примусова мобілізація виправдана під час війни.…
Найкраще, що ви можете зробити сьогодні в умовах виживання від двох диктатур, — це зберегти власне життя. Я виступила в Бундестазі, я говорила про вас. Деякі медіа, які підтримують Зеленського, висвітлили все дуже примітивно. Один німецький журналіст навіть доводив мені, що примусова мобілізація легальна, що повністю показало, що він абсолютно не розуміє, яких огидних форм вона набула в Україні. Однак були і медіа, я…
Друзья, у меня к вам небольшая просьба:
Давайте поможет единственному независимому СМИ Украины, набрать 100 000 подписчиков и положить мощный старт второй сотне тысячи!
👉 Подпишитесь на LIBERTY UA
Канал-сателлит с короткими нарезками из длинных эфиров
👉 LIBERTY TV
Очень благодарен всем, кто подпишется 🤝
💯469👍288🔥184🤝126👌102❤94🤬94😱52
Showing the 12 most recent of 144 posts we hold for @iuliiamendel1986. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The 3 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Чи вірите ви, що Володимир Зеленський не причетний до потоків зі спецоперації Карфаген?
Без нього не було б такого масштабу71%
Точно причетний, хоча б до частини36%
Він може бути ні при чому2%
Він не винен1%
The shares total 110%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
62% українців довіряють президенту — повідомив КМІС. Трохи арифметики.
«Повністю довіряють» — 24%, «скоріше довіряють» — 28%. Разом 52%, а не 62%.
Де ще 10%? Питання до вас: ви б проголосували за Зеленського на наступних президентських виборах?
Так, він найкращий президент.1%
У жодному разі.59%
Я за кандидата, який принесе мир.50%
Я за кандидата, який вестиме війну інакше.0%
The shares total 110%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
63% українців готові терпіти війну стільки, скільки треба. Ви серед них?
Так, абсолютно2%
Я хочу закінчення війни зараз на будь-яких умовах95%
Я за закінчення війни, але зі збереженням Донбасу і з гарантіями Заходу5%
The shares total 102%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 144 most recent posts we hold, published 13 September 2026 to 8 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Юлія Мендель” (@iuliiamendel1986), 86,281 subscribers as measured 8 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/iuliiamendel1986.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.