Channel
@iut_crush_new
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
3,937subscribers
-7 since we began measuring on 10 September 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001817610608 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @iut_crush_new |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 September 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/iut_crush_new |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Sept 2026, 19:37 | 3,937 | -2 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 08:19 | 3,939 | -5 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 16:22 | 3,944 | no change |
| 10 Sept 2026, 15:47 | 3,944 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 19 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 10 of 11 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (19 July 2026 – 6 September 2026) |
| Views total | 22,440 |
| Reactions total | 269 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 10 Sept 2026, 16:22 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
1,025 reactions across 17 posts, in 20 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 27.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🤣 | 277 | 27.0% | |
| 👍 | 196 | 19.1% | |
| 💔 | 196 | 19.1% | |
| ❤ | 124 | 12.1% | |
| 🔥 | 57 | 5.56% | |
| 🤡 | 48 | 4.68% | |
| 🗿 | 46 | 4.49% | |
| 🤔 | 22 | 2.15% | |
| 👎 | 21 | 2.05% | |
| 💅 | 8 | 0.78% | |
| 😭 | 8 | 0.78% | |
| 😐 | 5 | 0.488% | |
| 🆒 | 4 | 0.39% | |
| 🥰 | 4 | 0.39% | |
| 🐳 | 2 | 0.195% | |
| 😍 | 2 | 0.195% | |
| 🤷♂ | 2 | 0.195% | |
| 😁 | 1 | 0.098% | |
| 😢 | 1 | 0.098% | |
| 🥴 | 1 | 0.098% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,025 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 19 July 2026 to 6 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @iut_crush_new. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 19 July 2026 to 6 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
یه سوال دارم از پسرا که شاید سوال خیلی از دخترا باشه آیا میشه وارد رابطه عاطفی شد که باتوجه به حد و مرز دختر تا مدت طولانی رابطه جنسی نداشته باشند و وقتی از هدف رابطه مطمئن بودند و میدونستن جدیه اون موقع دو طرف راضی به این کار باشند
👍101👎15💅8🤡3
https://t.me/iut_crush_new/6888 اضاع خوب نیست گردن گیر ها خراب شده چرا انگار پیام ها کراش میره تو آنتی کراش و برعکس این صد تا کارکتر هم درست کن زیادههههههههه
پسرخوب خیلی رو مخی نیتیتیایایذیریهینیمیمیحبخبخییتیتیتذیریذیتینیخیحم😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅🫠🫠🫠🫠🫠🫠🫠🫠🫠🫠🤭🤭🤭🤭🤭🤭🤭🤭🤭🤭🤭
بعد ۳ سال دانشگا دیگه فک کنم وقتشه بیاد دوست پسرم شه🙂 کسی هست یا چی😂 وعحححح صدتا کارکتر نمیشههههههه سخاسدثکنطوسوسحمزدثلتثوثوسوکسنسوثوثوکزکزکزتوسوسوسوثوس
🤣18
خب من دانشجوی دانشگاه شما نیستم ولی اکثر پیام های شما رو میخونم و میخوام بگم یا توی این دوران دانشجویی وارد رابطه ای نشید، چون ممکنه اون رابطه شدیدا سمی باشه و شما رو از درس و مشق و هدف علمی دور کنه و صادقانه بگم دیگه راهی برای پشیمونی و جبران باقی نمیمونه یا وارد رابطه ای بشید که درست حسابی باشه دونفره تلاش کنید دونفره هدف داشته باشید و از درس خوندن تا پروژه و طراحی و صنعت، همراه باشید
❤29👍8🤡3
یک دو سه این یکیم امتحان میکنیم……………………………..سلام خوبید………………………….۱۰۰ تا بشو دیگه…………………………………………………………
@Iut_crushbot یه ربات نوشتیم برای اینکه کارتون راحت تر باشه و تا پیامو ارسال میکنید داخل چنل قرار بگیره و منتظر نمونید که قراره چی بشه و کی ادمین بخونه ادیت: فعلا خاموش با روش های قبلی برید جلو
👎1🤣1
https://t.me/iut_crush_new/6879 منو اکس کراشم دقیقا برعکس بودیم. من اونو یه جور خاص نگاه میکردم اونم من رو یه طور خاص نگاه میکرد. حتی اطرافیانمون هم این قضیه که شما معلومه رو هم کراش دارید رو تایید کردن. ولی من هرچقدر منتظر موندم حرکتی بزنه، حرکتی نزد:)
💔6
https://t.me/iut_crush_new/6879 توضیح بدم. من رو یکی کراش بودم.خودش رو یکی دیگه کراش بود.خیلی عاشقانه کراششو نگاه میکرد.نرسید بهش.منو اونجوری نگاه نمیکرد حین صحبت کردن باهاش. اخه میشد دید مثل آدم عادی بودیم برا هم یا علاقه دوطرفه بود.منم نگفتم بهش.
👍12
در فریب آرزو ها عجیب عمر ما میگذرد
👍30🐳1
خب ایوتی کراش داشت خاک میخورد منم از اکس کراشم بیام بگم. اره خلاصه اکس کراش ما رو یکی دیگه کراش بود بعد وقتی فهمیدم با اکس کراشش اوکی نتونست بشه اون شیوه نگاه کردنش به اونو تو خودم ندیدم به خودم گفتم زکی هیچی دیگه اره نگفتیم بهش.
🤔22😐5👍3🤷♂2🤡1
امروز روز جهانی دوستداران کتاب روزمون مبارک
🔥52🤡21❤6😍2
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @iut_crush_new. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“IUT CRUSH” (@iut_crush_new), 3,937 subscribers as measured 15 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/iut_crush_new.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.