У меня есть идея сделать что-то по реэнимал, но не думаю что кто-то шарит
custom 54698785306512326304

Channel
@ixiaxx
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
146subscribers
-2 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003653046112 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ixiaxx |
| Created | 28 December 2025 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 8 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ixiaxx |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Sept 2026, 15:59 | 146 | -2 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 12:19 | 148 | -3 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 07:24 | 151 | +4 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 16:09 | 147 | -6 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 15:18 | 153 | +4 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 04:21 | 149 | +1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 20:17 | 148 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 15:00 | 148 | first reading |
16 posts held, back to 28 December 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 16 posts for this entry, the most recent from 8 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
110 reactions across 5 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 23.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5469878530651232630 | 26 | 23.6% | |
| custom 5469906220305390714 | 21 | 19.1% | |
| custom 5447618294976643962 | 20 | 18.2% | |
| custom 5469650420643175144 | 15 | 13.6% | |
| custom 5445109746312971602 | 12 | 10.9% | |
| custom 5366246961278127621 | 8 | 7.27% | |
| custom 5469926973587363077 | 5 | 4.55% | |
| custom 5469734928419687252 | 3 | 2.73% |
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 110 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 28 December 2025 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
У меня есть идея сделать что-то по реэнимал, но не думаю что кто-то шарит
custom 54698785306512326304
За какие фд можно зашарить, и по какому можно нарисовать атмосферную полноценку скажите пж
custom 54699062203053907144
Вот и спидпеинт, давайте рк!!
🎀 🍏 𝗐𝗈𝗿𝗸 𝖿𝗼𝗋 :: @ixiaxx ! 🎀 𝗌𝗉𝖾𝖾𝖽𝗉𝖺𝗂𝗇𝗍 𝗏𝖾𝗋. ➿ ➿ ➿ • ➿ ➿ ➿ 🎀 #𝐈𝘅𝝸𝝰 :: #A𝗿𝘁 🤩 🎀
custom 54696504206431751449custom 53662469612781276216custom 54698785306512326305custom 54451097463129716022custom 54699062203053907141custom 54699269735873630771
Sticker, posted without a caption
40 рк = спидпеинт аватарки!!
🎀 🍏 𝓐𝗯ᦅ𝗎𝘁 :: 𝐈𝘅𝝸𝝰 ! 🎀 " 𝐈𝘅𝝸𝝰 - 𝖼𝗈𝗏𝖾𝗋𝗆𝖺𝗄𝖾𝗋 𝖺𝗇𝖽 𝖺𝗋𝗍𝗂𝗌𝗍 𝗐𝗁𝗈 𝗐𝗂𝗅𝗅 𝗂𝗆𝗉𝗋𝖾𝗌𝗌 𝗒𝗈𝗎 𝗐𝗂𝗍𝗁 𝗁𝖾𝗋 𝗍𝖺𝗅𝖾𝗇𝗍 “ 🎀𝟢𝟫.𝟢𝟫.𝟣𝟣 & 𝝚𝖭𝗧𝖩 ✝️ 🎀 ➿ ➿ ➿ • ➿ ➿ ➿ 🎀🌺 🎀 𝘁𝗮𝗀𝗌 :: 🎀💚 #A𝗿𝘁 🤩 🎀 #𝓒ᦅ𝘃𝖾𝗋 🤩🎀 🤩 ➿ ➿ ➿ • ➿ ➿ ➿ 🎀 #𝐈𝘅𝝸𝝰 :: #𝓐𝗯ᦅ𝗎𝘁 🤩 🎀
custom 544761829497664396220custom 546987853065123263017custom 546990622030539071415custom 54696504206431751444custom 54699269735873630774custom 54451097463129716023custom 54697349284196872523custom 53662469612781276212
Sticker, posted without a caption
Sticker, posted without a caption
Sticker, posted without a caption
🎀 🍏 𝗻𝗲𝘄 𝗲𝗿𝗮 = 𝗻𝗲𝘄 𝗺𝗲 ! 🎀
custom 54451097463129716027custom 54696504206431751442custom 54699062203053907141
Sticker, posted without a caption
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @ixiaxx. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“𝐈𝘅𝝸𝝰 !” (@ixiaxx), 146 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ixiaxx.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.