Channel
@izbornik_media
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1,172subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001535945684 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @izbornik_media |
| Created | 16 April 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 12 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 18 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/izbornik_media |
Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 18 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Sept 2026, 19:56 | 1,172 | +2 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 03:58 | 1,170 | +4 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 17:18 | 1,166 | +3 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 20:01 | 1,163 | +1 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 16:56 | 1,162 | -2 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 09:14 | 1,164 | +2 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 19:34 | 1,162 | -3 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 19:08 | 1,165 | -3 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 16:28 | 1,168 | -2 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 04:48 | 1,170 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 07:32 | 1,171 | -1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 19:30 | 1,172 | first reading |
7 posts held, back to 21 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 7 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
54 reactions across 7 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 59.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 32 | 59.3% | |
| 🔥 | 14 | 25.9% | |
| 🥰 | 8 | 14.8% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 7 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 54 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 7 most recent posts we hold, published 21 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Недавно появилась новость, что слово «нишевый» претендует на звание «Слово года – 2026». Но впереди ещё достаточно времени, чтобы появилось что-то более «хайповое»! Как говорится, следите за нашими соцсетями: мы будем рассказывать о словах года, которые выбирают разные издания. А пока давайте вспомним, что было популярно в прошлом году. Кстати, какие слова уже устарели? Нам вот кажется, что лабубы пропали и из язык…
❤5
«Всё в мире относительно!» Вы наверняка слышали эту фразу. Но вряд ли применяли к лингвистике, хотя… Хотя с относительностью у неё сложные и, пожалуй, неоднозначные отношения. Кто-то верит, что язык определяет мышление, в соответствии с гипотезой Сепира — Уорфа, а кто-то нет. Не первый век между этими группами людей возникают ожесточённые дискуссии. Почему? И в чём суть «скандальной» гипотезы лингвистической относ…
❤8🥰5
Вопросы? Суждения? Приглашаем вас обсудить последние лингвистические темы! Что вы думаете о великом «махаю»? Прошёл слух, что эта форма стала такой же нормой, как «машу». Что вы думаете о новом предмете в вузах — «Русский язык как государственный»? Рассказывайте всё, о чём боялись заговорить с друзьями-нелингвистами! P. S. Кстати, вопросы от вас и темы для будущих текстов мы тоже принимаем :) #редакция_изборник
🥰3❤2
Вишня или черешня? Собаки или кошки? Книги или комиксы? Вечные вопросы! А в последнем случае появляется ещё один: комиксы читают или всё-таки смотрят? Разбираемся! P. S. Ответы SMM-менеджера: черешня, кошки, книги. Вы свои в комментариях тоже оставляйте! #тексты_изборник
❤3🔥2
Знаете чувство, когда хочется так много всего сказать, но ты молчишь? Или эмоции переполняют, или слова подобрать не можешь? Люди с расстройствами аутистического спектра (РАС) живут в этом состоянии всегда. Существует вредный стереотип, что люди «в аутизме» не просто не могут говорить, а вообще к речи неспособны из-за умственных особенностей. Однако это не так. Они могут говорить, порой даже писать романы и стихи. И…
❤4🔥3
Афиша на сегодня: детектив про частицу ЖЕ, супергероика про неуловимую БЫ и психологический триллер про слова-двойники. Только сегодня — пригласительный билет от «Изборника»! Выбирайте фильм от студии «Слитно-раздельно»! #словоображение_изборник
🔥5❤3
Недавно жители Южной Кореи разделили с россиянами одну важную черту: они тоже полюбили Леонида Каневского! Как отмечают пользователи социальных сетей, их покорила харизма, обаяние и колоритный образ ведущего программы «Следствие вели». Мы полностью разделяем тёплые чувства, а потому снова возвращаемся к теме Леонида Каневского, но теперь уже с другими намерениями! Предлагаем вместе вспомнить его самые яркие цитаты и…
❤7🔥4
Showing the 7 most recent of 7 posts we hold for @izbornik_media. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Изборник | Русский язык и лингвистика” (@izbornik_media), 1,172 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/izbornik_media.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.