![Telegram profile photo for [D]aniyalov](https://cdn.tgregister.com/av/40/40ef8f3d83e989a6335fb99509c1c4b1ab24266e87ddc016f921d81e22e78e07.jpg)
Channel
@izi4gram
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
99subscribers
-5 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001446620513 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @izi4gram |
| Created | Between 1 April 2019 and 31 October 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 18 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/izi4gram |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Sept 2026, 16:21 | 99 | +1 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 17:18 | 98 | -1 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 22:03 | 99 | -1 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 15:05 | 100 | -4 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 09:30 | 104 | no change |
| 9 Aug 2026, 03:30 | 104 | first reading |
11 posts held, back to 31 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 11 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
84 reactions across 11 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 28 | 33.3% | |
| 👍 | 15 | 17.9% | |
| custom 5463294766693227492 | 8 | 9.52% | |
| 🔥 | 8 | 9.52% | |
| 🤣 | 7 | 8.33% | |
| custom 5212982685407936751 | 6 | 7.14% | |
| 😢 | 4 | 4.76% | |
| custom 5389047783011399274 | 3 | 3.57% | |
| custom 5996850651135480747 | 3 | 3.57% | |
| custom 5870512027755092461 | 2 | 2.38% |
Custom emoji. 5 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 84 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
— Почему они их чёрными делают? — спросил мальчик свою мать, с раздражением хватая занавески на окнах маршрутки. — Они же впитывают солнце! «Хорошй вопрос, смышлёный мальчик, хороший» — подумал я вытирая со лба пот и выжимая из рубашки ведро «воды».
❤5👍1😢1
У нас бы тоже такое приложение пригодилось.
❤3👍1😢1
Потом почитаю.
🤣4custom 53890477830113992743👍1
Летнюю маршрутку в Махачкале древние греки могли бы назвать переправой через Стикс. Они верили, что за переправу душ Харону надо платить одну монету, мы же... У нас за окном раскалённый город, вязнущий в пробках; в телефоне бесконечная лента новостей о ДТП, драках, штрафах и очередном городском безумии в Каспийске; в салоне — воздух, который давно перестал быть воздухом. Густая примесь жары, пота, разбавленного парф…
👍5❤3🔥1
В Махачкале был замечен МАХмобиль.
custom 54632947666932274925🤣3😢2
Динамо празднует попадание в РПЛ, 18 июня 2024 года. Тимур Магомаев снова пишет, я — фиксирую. Или в обратном порядке.
👍2❤1🔥1
Posted without readable text
custom 52129826854079367513custom 54632947666932274923❤1🔥1
Китай впереди планеты всей. Он, похоже, стал первой крупной страной, которая не просто массово внедряет ИИ, но и регулирует его. Особенно это видно на примере человекоподобных чат-ботов и «виртуальных партнёров»: с июля 2026 года такие сервисы в КНР обязаны предупреждать пользователя, ограничивать длительные сессии, отслеживать признаки зависимости, защищать несовершеннолетних и запускать кризисные механизмы, если о…
❤3custom 52129826854079367513custom 58705120277550924612
Когда поиск смысла приводит к выгоранию — исследование. Поиск смысла в работе приводит к выгоранию, показало 3-летнее исследование. Чем сильнее человек пытается найти «дело всей жизни», тем выше риск эмоционального истощения и цинизма. При этом те, кто уже видит ценность в своей работе, наоборот, чувствуют себя лучше и чаще испытывают удовлетворение. Люди, зацикленные на поиске глобального смысла своей жизни и рабо…
❤3👍2🔥2
Video, posted without a caption
❤5custom 59968506511354807473🔥2
Когда речь заходит об истории, мы любим заниматься идеализацией исторических персонажей и даже целых эпох. В итоге у нас развился своего рода комплекс неполноценности, что мы, ныне живущие, являемся недостойными, непутевыми потомками непогрешимых и великих предков. Правда же в том, что все пороки нашего времени не приобретены, а унаследованы нами от живших до нас. (С) Шамиль Ибрагимов, из материала по ссылке в Молодё…
❤4👍3🔥1
Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @izi4gram. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“[D]aniyalov” (@izi4gram), 99 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/izi4gram.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.