Channel
@jadna_reyhane
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
174subscribers
-3 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001237047443 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @jadna_reyhane |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/jadna_reyhane |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Sept 2026, 14:40 | 174 | -1 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 07:04 | 175 | -2 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 13:31 | 177 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 19:15 | 177 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 2 February 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 21 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
66 reactions across 18 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 81.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 54 | 81.8% | |
| 👍 | 7 | 10.6% | |
| 👎 | 2 | 3.03% | |
| 🕊 | 2 | 3.03% | |
| 👌 | 1 | 1.52% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 66 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 2 February 2026 to 21 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
استوری توهینآمیز و قلدرمآبانه رحیم زاهدی، مشاور وزیر نیرو و عضو ستاد علم و فناوری شورای عالی انقلاب فرهنگی: بخاطر اینکه مادرم در فروشگاه اتکا روسری به همراه نداشت، تذکر گرفت، با معاون وزیر دفاع تماس گرفتم و شستمش، قرار شد حضوری عذرخواهی کند! تازه این شخص مشاور وزیر ست، نه معاون و مدیر وزارتخانه ببینید چگونه گستاخانه و وقیحانه سخن میگوید و قانون حجاب را نادیده میگیرد. اگر دستگاه های فرهنگی در خواب زمستانی اند و م…
👍3
#راهبلد 💠مسئله حجاب به معنای منزوی کردن زن نیست. اگر کسی چنین برداشتی داشته باشد، برداشتش کاملاً غلط و انحرافی است. حجاب به هیچ وجه مزاحم و مانع فعالیتهای سیاسی و اجتماعی و علمی نیست. -قائد شهید، سیدعلی حسینی خامنهای- [روز عفاف و حجاب] 🦋@jadna_reyhane
❤4
#برگ_ریحان 🔹اگر زنان نبودند، آیا حماسهها ماندگار میشدند؟ روایتی از نقش بیبدیل زنان در تاریخ مقاومت؛ از کربلا تا همهٔ میدانهای دفاع از حق ▫️زن در متن تاریخِ مقاومت در گذر پرفراز و نشیب تاریخ، آنگاه که طوفانهای سهمگین جنگ، بنیاد سرزمینها را به لرزه درآورده و فریاد «هل من ناصر» از گلوی حقطلبان برخاسته است، همواره در کنار مردان پولادیناراده، سیمای تابناک زنانی نقش بسته است که اگر سلاح در دست نداشتند، اما سلا…
❤3
🔖📎عزم قاطع بر انتقام خون رهبر شهید انقلاب ✏️ ملت عزیز عزم قاطع بر انتقام خون پاک رهبر شهید انقلاب و همه شهدای جنگ تحمیلی دوم و سوم را در روح و قلب خود زنده نگهمیدارد و پیوسته مترصّد تحقق آن خواهد بود. 🗓 ۲۰/فروردین/۱۴۰۵ 📝 انتشار بهمناسبت بدرقه آقای شهید ایران | #یگانه_دوران ▪️ برنامههای بدرقه آقای شهید ایران ⏺️مراسم تشییع در عراق: چهارشنبه ۱۷ تیرماه ▪️مراسم تشییع در مشهد و تدفین در حرم امام رضا علیه السلام: پ…
❤3
◼️تنها ۱ روز تا بدرقه همیشگی رهبر شهیدمان هر روز، یک قدم نزدیکتر، به وداعی که فراموش نخواهد شد...🥀 #رهبر_شهید #وداع #باید_برخاست 🇮🇷جامعه اسلامی دانشجویان
❤4
◼️تنها ۲ روز تا بدرقه همیشگی رهبر شهیدمان هر روز، یک قدم نزدیکتر، به وداعی که فراموش نخواهد شد...🥀 #رهبر_شهید #وداع 🇮🇷جامعه اسلامی دانشجویان
❤5
◼️تنها ۳ روز تا بدرقه همیشگی رهبر شهیدمان هر روز، یک قدم نزدیکتر، به وداعی که فراموش نخواهد شد...🥀 #رهبر_شهید #وداع 🇮🇷جامعه اسلامی دانشجویان
❤3
◼️تنها ۴ روز تا بدرقه همیشگی رهبر شهیدمان هر روز، یک قدم نزدیکتر، به وداعی که فراموش نخواهد شد...🥀 #رهبر_شهید #وداع 🇮🇷جامعه اسلامی دانشجویان
🕊2
امشب فلک گریان به حالِ آل اطهار است! شامِ غریبان است...🥀 🦋@jadna_reyhane
❤2
💬 هر خونی، خونبهائی دارد که قاتلین جنایتکار شهیدان باید بزودی آن را بپردازند.| ۲۶/اسفند/۱۴۰۴ 📲 @rahbar_enghelab_ir
#برگ_ریحان 🔹بانوان متدین باید درباره تفاهم، به یک مسئله دقت اساسی کنند! ▪️اینکه به تفاهم نامه و نحوه عملیاتی آن انتقادات جدی وارد است یک سوی مساله است و سوی دیگر این است که ما نباید اجازه دهیم جامعه حزب اللهی وارد یأس جمعی شود! الان چه چیزی دشمن را بعد از این توافق خوشحال میکند این که جامعه حزب اللهی ایران به عنوان عامل مقاوم و ضربه زننده به دشمن دچار یاس جمعی شود و ناخواسته به انفعال کشیده شود... ▪️اینجور مواقع…
❤4
کارگروه ریحانه در پیامرسان ایتا 🦋https://eitaa.com/jadna_reyhane
❤4
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @jadna_reyhane. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ریــحــ🦋ــانــہ” (@jadna_reyhane), 174 subscribers as measured 13 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/jadna_reyhane.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.