È STATO FUORI DI TESTA. Ma come funziona davvero un’eclissi? Qua tutto il dietro le quinte della mega spedizione in Spagna ☀️🌑 https://youtu.be/riGpHqfHWYI
🔥20❤2

Channel
@jakidale
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
24,574subscribers
-206 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001038653661 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @jakidale |
| Created | 3 April 2016 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (TGDataset) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 19 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 35 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 19 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/jakidale |
National news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 83% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 19 Sept 2026, 06:37 | 24,574 | -7 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 23:19 | 24,581 | -2 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 02:15 | 24,583 | -4 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 10:15 | 24,587 | -9 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 12:54 | 24,596 | -13 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 21:01 | 24,609 | -15 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 13:41 | 24,624 | -4 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 14:01 | 24,628 | -12 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 06:08 | 24,640 | -8 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 05:25 | 24,648 | -6 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 07:35 | 24,654 | -6 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 10:04 | 24,660 | -5 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 11:08 | 24,665 | -5 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 12:52 | 24,670 | -3 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 16:03 | 24,673 | -4 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 18:43 | 24,677 | -7 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 18:23 | 24,684 | -8 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 21:18 | 24,692 | -8 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 07:35 | 24,700 | -5 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 19:27 | 24,705 | first reading |
22 posts held, back to 30 September 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 58 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 22 posts for this entry, the most recent from 14 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
583 reactions across 22 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 61.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 361 | 61.9% | |
| 🔥 | 101 | 17.3% | |
| 👍 | 76 | 13.0% | |
| 🤯 | 19 | 3.26% | |
| 👏 | 16 | 2.74% | |
| 🥰 | 7 | 1.20% | |
| 😁 | 2 | 0.343% | |
| 😱 | 1 | 0.172% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 22 of the 22 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 583 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 22 most recent posts we hold, published 30 September 2025 to 14 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @jakidale. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 22 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 30 September 2025 to 14 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
È STATO FUORI DI TESTA. Ma come funziona davvero un’eclissi? Qua tutto il dietro le quinte della mega spedizione in Spagna ☀️🌑 https://youtu.be/riGpHqfHWYI
🔥20❤2
In questi giorni purtroppo l’Italia sta bruciando da nord a sud… Sono entrato nella base dei Canadair per vedere da vicino chi combatte gli incendi dal cielo, e come fa. Il video è online ora. E un grazie enorme a piloti e squadre a terra 🔥💪🏼 https://youtu.be/BJHYeWS3-nI?is=EV2doNFp781Bl0lG
❤19🔥2
Sono andato a caccia di radiazioni in giro per il mondo e ho trovato cose totalmente inaspettate! https://youtu.be/QPSRRvQprPQ?si=ZhFZWfHaMJEOyf2V
❤18👍2🔥1
Sta per uscire uno dei film più attesi dell’anno ma per chi si fosse perso qualcosa un anno fa mi sono imbucato sul set per provare a scoprire i segreti dei uno dei registi più pazzeschi della storia, quindi andate a recuperarvelo! https://youtu.be/rBPIxvCOwiY?si=jD3LOWrJzTcE4ZjX
🔥10❤7
È UFFICIALMENTE UN GUINNES WORLD RECORD 🔥🔥🔥 https://youtu.be/3Op1-uCZ3rw
❤34🔥4👍3
Elon Musk ha costruito una città intera nel deserto del Texas per un solo motivo: andare su Marte. Ci sono stato dentro, sotto Starship: il razzo più grande mai costruito dall'uomo. Dal vivo è un'altra cosa. Nuovo video ora: https://youtu.be/Gvi0UHMyusA
❤19👍2🔥1
Sabato 20 giugno sarò a Ivrea con degli ospiti decisamente speciali 💪🏼 Insieme a me ci saranno Federico Faggin, l'uomo che ha inventato il microprocessore, e Massimo Banzi, cofondatore di Arduino. Si parla di tecnologia, coscienza e futuro a partire dalla città che il futuro lo ha già visto una volta. È gratis ma i posti vanno prenotati. Tutte le info qua: https://www.eventbrite.it/o/121378537558
❤15👍3🔥1
La situazione sta decisamente sfuggendo di mano, correte a vedere l’ultimo video uscito sul canale! https://youtu.be/TBlIbUhJt2U
👍9❤8🔥2
Altro giorno, altra live! Una fase finale ma davvero critica per Artemis II: il rientro. Seguitelo ora con noi! https://youtube.com/live/yilusM8TTos?feature=share
🔥11❤6👏2
Nuovo video a tema GENETICA 🧬 Vi prometto che scoprirete cose che non pensavate potessero esistere! https://youtu.be/7AzPPMKGUsY
❤15👍4
E concludiamo la nostra avventura cinese con un video uscito direttamente dal FUTURO! https://youtu.be/QmluhdnxRRQ
❤20👍4
No, non è Las Vegas, è ancora più folle! https://youtu.be/QJvJzbe71FA
🔥13👍5❤2👏1
Showing the 12 most recent of 22 posts we hold for @jakidale. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Jakidale” (@jakidale), 24,574 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/jakidale.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.