Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for π‰π€πŒπ„π’ π†πŽπ‹πƒ πŒπ€π’π“π„π‘

Channel

π‰π€πŒπ„π’ π†πŽπ‹πƒ πŒπ€π’π“π„π‘

@jamesgoldmasterfx0

On this record: Topic Β· Observations Β· Growth Β· Engagement Β· What this channel posts Β· Reactions Β· Posts Β· Citations Β· Cite this entry

20,687subscribers

-1,535 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register Β· movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002376889776
TypeChannel
Username@jamesgoldmasterfx0
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 β€” estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held32
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/jamesgoldmasterfx0

Topic

Crypto & trading β€” a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 97% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured β€” it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Views per post sit far below this size band

3.0 average views per post against 20,687 subscribers β€” an engagement rate of 0.014%. Across the 5,383 registered channels in the same cohort β€” 10,000–31,618 subscribers, posting mainly in English β€” the middle half sit between 1.86% and 10.4%, with a median of 5.12%.

What this was computed from
Window30 days (24 August 2026 – 23 September 2026)
Posts measured261 of 261 published in the window (261 exact, 0 rounded by Telegram)
Views totalled770
Mature posts only0.016% over 20 posts read at least 24h after publication
Subscribers20,687 measured 18 September 2026
Cohortb10000:eng Β· 5,383 channels Β· p10 0.5% Β· p25 1.86% Β· p50 5.12% Β· p75 10.4% Β· p90 18.3%
Position in cohort0.186th percentile Β· 1/333 the cohort median
UncertaintyΒ±0.14% of the figure, from Telegram’s rounding
Post languageEnglish Β· 100.0% of the window’s posts

When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or below the 1st percentile of its cohort and is at least 3Γ— away from that cohort’s median β€” below it β€” on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.

This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal. A low rate has many innocent causes β€” audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.

Recorded under the key err_low, last confirmed 23 September 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through β€” we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Growth

20,68722,22221,454.57 August 2026 β€” 22,222 subscribers8 August 2026 β€” 22,201 subscribers9 August 2026 β€” 22,058 subscribers10 August 2026 β€” 21,927 subscribers11 August 2026 β€” 21,902 subscribers12 August 2026 β€” 21,887 subscribers13 August 2026 β€” 21,872 subscribers14 August 2026 β€” 21,835 subscribers16 August 2026 β€” 21,808 subscribers17 August 2026 β€” 21,541 subscribers18 August 2026 β€” 21,507 subscribers19 August 2026 β€” 21,478 subscribers20 August 2026 β€” 21,464 subscribers21 August 2026 β€” 21,454 subscribers23 August 2026 β€” 21,439 subscribers24 August 2026 β€” 21,414 subscribers25 August 2026 β€” 21,386 subscribers26 August 2026 β€” 21,368 subscribers27 August 2026 β€” 21,356 subscribers28 August 2026 β€” 21,336 subscribers30 August 2026 β€” 21,308 subscribers31 August 2026 β€” 21,134 subscribers1 September 2026 β€” 20,994 subscribers2 September 2026 β€” 20,983 subscribers3 September 2026 β€” 20,952 subscribers5 September 2026 β€” 20,917 subscribers8 September 2026 β€” 20,860 subscribers11 September 2026 β€” 20,799 subscribers13 September 2026 β€” 20,771 subscribers14 September 2026 β€” 20,736 subscribers16 September 2026 β€” 20,721 subscribers18 September 2026 β€” 20,687 subscribers7 August 202618 September 2026
32 measurements spanning 42 days, net -1,535. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between β€” snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean β€œno change observed”, never β€œinterpolated”. The vertical axis spans 20,457–22,452 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log β€” every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 32
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Sept 2026, 10:4220,687-34
16 Sept 2026, 03:2120,721-15
14 Sept 2026, 13:1520,736-35
13 Sept 2026, 02:5620,771-28
11 Sept 2026, 07:5620,799-61
8 Sept 2026, 12:2120,860-57
5 Sept 2026, 03:5620,917-35
3 Sept 2026, 08:2020,952-31
2 Sept 2026, 04:3320,983-11
1 Sept 2026, 01:0920,994-140
31 Aug 2026, 03:4921,134-174
30 Aug 2026, 02:2221,308-28
28 Aug 2026, 23:5421,336-20
27 Aug 2026, 21:5221,356-12
26 Aug 2026, 22:1521,368-18
25 Aug 2026, 21:4321,386-28
24 Aug 2026, 18:5421,414-25
23 Aug 2026, 04:0521,439-15
21 Aug 2026, 15:5921,454-10
20 Aug 2026, 14:5221,464first reading

Engagement

558 posts held, back to 7 August 2026 β€” the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 57 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR Β· 30 days
0.014%
avg views Γ· 20,687 subscribers
Avg views / post
3.0
261 posts measured
Reaction rate
β€”
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
261
of 558 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) Γ· views β€” note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days Β· latest post in window 3 September 2026
Posts held558 (7 August 2026 – 3 September 2026)
Views total770
Reactions totalβ€”
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface β€” not measured, not estimated
Readings taken3 Sept 2026, 17:36 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than β€œcorrecting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form β€” 8.12K, 3.7M β€” so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded β€” read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
48s
Average length
48s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel β€” not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no β‰ˆ mark.

Reaction mix

7 reactions across 7 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 42.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❀342.9%
πŸ‘342.9%
πŸ‘114.3%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities β€” πŸ™ is thanks in one channel and mourning in another β€” so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one β€” 4.34K, 1.2M β€” so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 558 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post β€” not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above β€” those same posts carry 7 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by β€œa reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 558 most recent posts we hold, published 7 August 2026 to 3 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

3 Sept 2026, 16:07 UTC1 viewsread 3 September 2026
Photo

THIS IS WHAT I LOVE TO SEE! Some of you recovered, some secured clean profit, and some even made $200+ in a single day from the LiveTrade. πŸ’― The best part? Even after a rough start, those who stayed disciplined and followed the plan still managed to turn the day around. This is trading not every entry will be perfect, but discipline can change the whole result. #ChartsycoElite

3 Sept 2026, 14:20 UTC1 viewsread 3 September 2026
Photo

♻️Today payout is done ‼️♻️ All investors should kindly confirm the USDT address we registered them with, Contact Admin for support. Contact our representative if you&interested to join the program!

Showing the 12 most recent of 558 posts we hold for @jamesgoldmasterfx0. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked β‰ˆ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it β€” t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so β‰ˆ1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason β€” naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides β€” the β€œNamed by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 β€” this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

β€œπ‰π€πŒπ„π’ π†πŽπ‹πƒ πŒπ€π’π“π„π‘β€ (@jamesgoldmasterfx0), 20,687 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/jamesgoldmasterfx0.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV Β· JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.