Channel
@janeiscounting
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
460subscribers
-6 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002236794817 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @janeiscounting |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/janeiscounting |
Personal blog — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 21 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 67% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Sept 2026, 18:40 | 460 | -4 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 05:36 | 464 | -2 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 10:26 | 466 | +1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 01:57 | 465 | -1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 19:03 | 466 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 08:20 | 466 | first reading |
10 posts held, back to 25 January 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 10 posts for this entry, the most recent from 20 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
231 reactions across 10 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 65.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 152 | 65.8% | |
| ❤🔥 | 28 | 12.1% | |
| 🔥 | 22 | 9.52% | |
| 👍 | 10 | 4.33% | |
| 🥰 | 6 | 2.60% | |
| 🤝 | 5 | 2.16% | |
| ✍ | 3 | 1.30% | |
| 😍 | 3 | 1.30% | |
| 💊 | 1 | 0.433% | |
| 💯 | 1 | 0.433% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 231 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 25 January 2026 to 20 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @janeiscounting. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 10 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 25 January 2026 to 20 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
🤩 Пустые баночки Три года я принимаю системные ретиноиды против акне — они подавляют выработку кожного сала. Кожа стала гиперчувствительной: часто краснеет, нагревается и шелушится. Я провела ревизию, какие банки с этим помогают, а какие — не очень. Важно: я хочу, чтобы косметика не только работала, но развлекала. Мне скучно пользоваться одними и теми же аптечными средствами — их в списке минимум. Успокаивающий ге…
❤11✍3
Три месяца не писала в канал. Тяжело признавать, но кажется, тема денег перестала меня так сильно волновать. Это второй раз, когда я буксую с телеграм-каналом: мой первый был про кино (см. @russianzoetrope), теперь — про деньги. Как правило, в блогинге учат выбрать нишу и годами о ней писать, собирая аудиторию. Но у меня так не выходит — мои интересы постоянно меняются. Лет десять назад я позиционировала себя как …
❤42👍9❤🔥6🔥2
💎 Как наживать деньги Как обещала, [запоздало] возвращаюсь с любопытными соображениями из книжки «Как наживать деньги» 1888 года. Её написал американский импресарио Ф. Т. Барнум — это про него сняли фильм «Величайший шоумен». «Не подавайте нищим. Истинный нищий не протягивает руку и стыдится просить. Те, кто просит Христовым именем, обыкновенно нищие-промышленники. Лучше помогайте известной вам бедной, но честной с…
❤13🔥3
Взяла в отпуск вот такой талмуд. Содержание интересует?
❤12😍3
Мы или не мы?
❤11🤝5💊1💯1
⚖️ Справедливость ищут в комментариях Я листаю рилсы и всё чаще натыкаюсь на один и тот же формат обращений: — «Яндекс, вы считаете это нормальным?»; — «Lime, совсем офигели?»; — «МТС, объяснитесь». Это уже почти отдельный жанр, к которому я моментально подключаюсь. Через пару секунд я уже злюсь вместе с автором видео. И, если честно, мне даже нравится это чувство. Это желание справедливости. Это «мы сейчас им пок…
❤14
Иногда я в шоке, что вытворяют ребята на калистенике
❤9🔥5
🔅 Как я пытаюсь похудеть (и не сойти с ума) Всего полгода на одном из антидепрессантов — и уже +10 кг. Раньше такие новости толкали меня в пучину жёсткого дефицита калорий, отказа от углеводов или спорта до упаду. Финал всегда один: усталость → срыв → горит сарай, гори и хата. Сейчас пробую иначе: 1. Питание. Подсчёт калорий вгоняет меня в стресс. Я прикидываю энергетическую ценность на глаз и каждый день обязат…
❤19🔥4👍1
🦥 Как перестать лежать на диване Спойлер: я не знаю. В этом году я долго отхожу от праздников: лежу уютным котёночком, работаю левой пяткой и в любой непонятной ситуации смотрю рилсы. Мой парень гладит меня по голове и целует в лобик. А я чувствую: мне не нужно никому ничего доказывать — я и так ок. Вот он, хэппи-энд. Мне классно и безопасно. Останусь на диване навсегда. Почти. Взрослая женщина внутри меня напо…
❤21
Чем же все это окончится? — Будет апрель.
❤🔥22🔥8🥰6
Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @janeiscounting. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Где деньги, Женя?” (@janeiscounting), 460 subscribers as measured 12 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/janeiscounting.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.