Channel
@jangefarhang
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
2,498subscribers
-11 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001070252272 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @jangefarhang |
| Created | 2 September 2016 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (TGDataset) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 13 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/jangefarhang |
Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 15 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Sept 2026, 05:01 | 2,498 | +2 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 03:20 | 2,496 | -4 |
| 7 Sept 2026, 11:17 | 2,500 | -1 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 13:18 | 2,501 | -2 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 17:03 | 2,503 | +2 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 07:47 | 2,501 | +2 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 12:16 | 2,499 | +1 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 07:46 | 2,498 | -4 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 09:34 | 2,502 | -2 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 00:52 | 2,504 | -4 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 07:10 | 2,508 | -1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 05:34 | 2,509 | no change |
| 5 Aug 2026, 23:12 | 2,509 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 2 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 4 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
28 reactions across 12 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 57.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 16 | 57.1% | |
| ❤ | 4 | 14.3% | |
| 😁 | 4 | 14.3% | |
| 😭 | 3 | 10.7% | |
| 👎 | 1 | 3.57% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 28 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 4 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
اورانیوم؟ بدیم بره موشکها؟ بدیم بره تنگه هرمز؟ بدیم بره جزایر جنوب؟ بدیم بره دانش هستهای؟ بدیم بره متحدان منطقهای؟ بدیم بره روش مملکتداری تیم ظریف همین هست تفاوتشون با پهلوی فقط در لباس و کروات هست عبـدالمـجید خرقـانی ═════🇮🇷═════ @JANGEFARHANG
👍2👎1
پاسخ به خودتحقیری آقا میری....... یاد خاطرات شاه قاجار به سفر فرنگ افتادم خزعبلات این شخص رو دیدیم. ═════🇮🇷═════ @JANGEFARHANG
👍2
رویترز : وقتی با رضا پهلوی حرف میزنی، میفهمی بیشتر از سیاست به فوتبال، غذا و عکاسی علاقه داره کاملاً مشخصه که او ویژگی های لازم برای رهبری را ندارد. ═════🇮🇷═════ @JANGEFARHANG
😁3
🔴 کاربر آمریکایی: صدام حسین ۲ قطعنامه سازمان ملل را زیر پا گذاشت و آمریکا او را اعدام کرد 🔹نتانیاهو ۷۷ قطعنامه سازمان ملل را زیر پا گذاشت و هنوز زنده است. عجیب نیست؟ ═════🇮🇷═════ @JANGEFARHANG
👍1
💢 امام جمعه ساری: بی حجابی سبک زندگی یزیده، یزید زمانه نباشید ═════🇮🇷═════ @JANGEFARHANG
✅ صحنهای از خار مریم که یک منافق را تحت تاثیر قرارداد ═════🇮🇷═════ @JANGEFARHANG
😁1
مردمی که دیگهای خود برای دفاع از میهن و دوری از جنگ ندادند... سالی که احتمال حمله به ایران میرفت و ایران تحریم بود «امیرکبیر» یک مهندس اتریشی را استخدام کرد تا برای ایران توپ جنگی بسازد. اما فلز مورد نیاز موجود نبود و راه واردات هم به علت تحریم بسته بود، امیرکبیر فراخوان عمومی به مردم داد تا مردم دیگ های اضافه ی خود را بیاورند برای ساخت توپ. «نفوذی های انگلیس»در شهر و «روزنامهها» که تازه راه اندازی شده بود بین …
👍1
به علت بالا رفتن فشار روانی در بین سربازان ارتش آمریکا و افزایش مخالفت ها جهت شرکت در جنگ با ایران، کاخ سفید و پنتاگون با راه اندازی یک کمپین تبلیغاتی مشترک، درحال پمپاژ محتوای ایدئولوژیک برای ترغیب سربازان آمریکایی جهت اعزام به جنگ ایران هستند نکته ماجرا این است از سربازان عمدتا مسیحی ارتش آمریکا با اشاره به یک آیه از تورات خواستهاند به جنگ برای کشته شدن برای اسرائیل بپیوندد! ═════🇮🇷═════ @JANGEFARHANG
🔴اعتراف بی سابقه در پخش زنده: ما کشورهای حاشیه خلیج فارس آلت دستیم، اختیاری از خود نداریم! "آقا! ما آلت دستیم، آلت دست! بیاختیاریم، نه تصمیمگیر! کاری از ما ساخته نیست." ═════🇮🇷═════ @JANGEFARHANG
مدعی خواست كه از بیخ كند ریشه ما غافل از آنكه خدا هست در اندیشه ما قرار بود 4روزه کار تمام شود. تصویر سمت چپ بالا، اقیانوس جمعیت مقاومت در عراق، سمت چپ پایین یمن و تصاویر دیگر ایران... 5ماه پس از آن حمله ما همچنان درکنار آقا امام حسین (ع)ایستاده ایم ═════🇮🇷═════ @JANGEFARHANG
❤1
تحلیلگر حوزه ژئوپلیتیک و مفسر سیاسی پاکستانی-آمریکایی: آمریکا دقیقا چه زمانی قدرتمندترین کشور جهان بود؟ وقتی میلیونها نفر را در ویتنام به خاک و خون کشید؟ وقتی میلیونها نفر را در جنگ کره کشت؟ وقتی روی مردم بیگناه ژاپن بمب اتم انداخت؟ وقتی به بهانه جنگهای ساختگی، میلیونها مسلمان را در سراسر جهان کشت؟ وقتی با تهدید و فشار، دولتهایی مانند دولت پاکستان را سرنگون کرد؟ وقتی فاسدترین بانکهای تجاری جهان را در خود جای …
عمان دقیقا چهکاره است که بخواهد مسیر رفت یا برگشت را کنترل کند؟ ما جنگیدیم ما شهید دادیم ما هزینه دادیم آنوقت طرف مفت مفت صاحب نصف امتیازات تنگه شود؟ ═════🇮🇷═════ @JANGEFARHANG
👍3
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @jangefarhang. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“جنگ فرهنگی” (@jangefarhang), 2,498 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/jangefarhang.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.