Channel
@janob_musayev
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
1,806subscribers
+5 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001747410807 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @janob_musayev |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 14 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 18 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/janob_musayev |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 16 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 70% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Sept 2026, 16:41 | 1,806 | -1 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 07:18 | 1,807 | +6 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 17:39 | 1,801 | -12 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 17:17 | 1,813 | +7 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 03:12 | 1,806 | +3 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 12:07 | 1,803 | +3 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 08:26 | 1,800 | -4 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 05:23 | 1,804 | +6 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 09:29 | 1,798 | -3 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 12:48 | 1,801 | +4 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 05:48 | 1,797 | -8 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 17:06 | 1,805 | +4 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 17:33 | 1,801 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 17:15 | 1,801 | first reading |
17 posts held, back to 27 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 2 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
417 reactions across 17 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 155 | 37.2% | |
| 😁 | 107 | 25.7% | |
| ❤ | 87 | 20.9% | |
| 🔥 | 39 | 9.35% | |
| 💯 | 15 | 3.60% | |
| ✍ | 4 | 0.959% | |
| 🤯 | 4 | 0.959% | |
| 🤣 | 3 | 0.719% | |
| 🗿 | 2 | 0.48% | |
| 👨💻 | 1 | 0.24% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 417 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 27 May 2026 to 2 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Agar xizmat yoki mahsulot narxi qandaydir devorlar ortiga berkitilgan bo'lsa va uni ko'rish uchun shaxsiy ma'lumotlaringizni qaysidir tizimda doimiy qoldirishdan boshqa yo'l yo'q bo'lsa, unda bu narx adolat bilan qo'yilgan narx emas. #startup_life @Janob_Musayev
👍21🔥4❤2
5 ta farqni topinglar) #polvon @Janob_Musayev
😁21🔥4❤2👍1
Timeweb rahmat GrantGO, MentorGO va EventGO loyihalari saytlari ishga tushgandan beri server provayder sifatida TimeWebni ishlatib kelamiz. Servisi zo'r ishlaydi. Admin panel zamonaviy ko'rinishda va juda qulay. Narxlari ham judayam arzon, tahminan oyiga $10-15 (edi). O'tgan 5 yil ichida deyarli uzilish bo'lmadi. Bo'lganda ham bizga ta'sir qiladigan darajada emasdi. Narxlarida ozroq o'zgarish bo'lganda ham boshqa b…
👍16❤4
Zubayr har safar uydagi muzaltgich oldidan o'tganda shu magnitga qarab talpinadi. Irlandiyada tug'ilgan bo'lsa ham qalban O'zbekistonlik baribir 🇺🇿 #polvon @Janob_Musayev
👍31❤18💯3
Ikki yo'ldan birini tanlash Qachon gap faqatgina 2 ta yo'ldan birini tanlash haqida ketganda odatda ularning o'rtasida ham yo'l bo'ladi. Aslida bitta emas ko'plab yo'llar bo'ladi. Ammo ijtimoiy tarmoqlardagi bu kabi postlar, qisqa qo'llanmalarda narsalarni faqat oq-qora tarzda ko'rsatish ancha osonroq. Bu bilan jarayonni aslidagidan ko'ra ancha sodda qilib ko'rsatish mumkin. To'g'rida, kim ham murakkablikni yoqtira…
👍3
Birinchi rasmdagidek mashinalar ishlab chiqishdan ikkinchi rasmdagiga yetib kelish uchun qanchalik ahmoq bo'lish kerakligini hech tushunmayman. Tarixdagi eng iconic bo'lgan logotiplardan birini ham o'ldirishdi. #off_topic #cars #jaguar @Janob_Musayev
💯8👍3🗿2
Darsliklarga kirishga arziydigan kompaniya Bir yil, atigi bir yil oldin ham AI desa ko'pchilik ChatGPTni tushunardi. Huddi internet desa odamlar Googleni tushunganidek. Lekin hozirga kelib hamma AI kompaniyalar bir kompaniya ortidan quvishga urinyapti, ular qilgan ishni o'ylab ham o'tirmay ko'chiryapti, ular yaratgan protokollardan foydalanyapti. AI sanoati standartini ular belgilab beryapti. Albatta, bu kompaniya …
❤13🔥4👍2✍1😁1
Raqamlashtirish — bu faqat texnologiya olib kirish emas Biznes yoki tashkilotlar ishini raqamlashtirish (digital transformation) deganda ko'pchilik u yerga yangi texnologiyalar olib kirish, saytlar qurish, ERP, CRM ishlatishni tushunadi. Lekin raqamlashtirish faqat texnologiyadan iborat jarayon emas. Texnologiya ishning ko'pi bilan 3 dan 1 qismi. Yuqoridagi postda esa uning yana bir qismi haqida aytib o'tilgan — ja…
👍8❤3
Claude Code limiti uchun kichik "hack" Claude Codedan foydalanib ko'rganlar biladiki uning 5 soatlik limiti tugab qolishi oson. Ayniqsa, kuchliroq modellar ishlatilganda. Yashirin muammo Lekin bu yerda muammo faqat limit ozligida emas, uning hisoblanishi qachon boshlanishida ham. Claude bu yerda rolling window usulidan foydalanadi. Masalan, agar siz 9:00 dan kelib ish boshlasangiz, limitingiz 9:00 da boshlanadi v…
👍33🔥6✍2❤2👨💻1
Anthropic eng kirchimol modeli bo'lgan Sonnetning 5-versiyasini e'lon qilibdi. Benchmarklar va yangiliklarni o'zingiz ko'rib olarsiz. Eng asosiysi 31-avgustgacha Sonnet 4.6 dan ham arzonroq ishlar ekan. #news #AI @Janob_Musayev
🔥7❤3
Kod hech qachon aldamaydi Ishda koddagi deyarli hamma o'zgarishlar SI bilan qilinayotgani yoqmayotgan bir joyi hamma yerda ortiqcha kod izohlari ko'payib ketgani. PRlarda bir qator o'zgarishga ham 5 qator izoh yozilyapti. Haqiqiy kodni o'qish qiyinlashib ketyapti. Linus akaning 26 yil oldin aytgan gaplarini qayta trendga chiqarish kerak bo'lgan zamondamiz. #engineering_life @Janob_Musayev
👍13💯4
Bugun dam olish kuni oilam bilan aylangani chiqdik. Ketishdan oldin Claudega 4-5 ta ishni qator qilib tayinlab, har biriga "Savol so'ramasdan bajar" deb qo'shib, elevated rejimga qo'yib keldim. Eng muhimi "Make no mistakes!" deb tayinladim. Uyga borgandan keyin qilgan ishlarini tekshirib olaman. Yaxshi qilmagan bo'lsa gap eshitadi :) @Janob_Musayev
😁51❤5
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @janob_musayev. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Janob Musayev | Engineering Life” (@janob_musayev), 1,806 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/janob_musayev.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.