Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Java逮捕

Channel

Java逮捕

@java

2 usernames

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

17,552subscribers

-64 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002489094154
TypeChannel
Usernames@haohuoji @java
Description逮捕行动
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live29 August 2026
Measurements held18
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 29 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/java

Growth

17,54917,61617,582.510 August 2026 — 17,616 subscribers10 August 2026 — 17,616 subscribers11 August 2026 — 17,602 subscribers12 August 2026 — 17,609 subscribers13 August 2026 — 17,606 subscribers14 August 2026 — 17,609 subscribers16 August 2026 — 17,608 subscribers17 August 2026 — 17,605 subscribers18 August 2026 — 17,584 subscribers19 August 2026 — 17,568 subscribers20 August 2026 — 17,565 subscribers22 August 2026 — 17,549 subscribers24 August 2026 — 17,556 subscribers25 August 2026 — 17,550 subscribers26 August 2026 — 17,552 subscribers27 August 2026 — 17,554 subscribers28 August 2026 — 17,556 subscribers29 August 2026 — 17,552 subscribers17,55210 August 202629 August 2026
18 measurements spanning 19 days, net -64. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 17,539–17,626 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
29 Aug 2026, 12:3417,552-4
28 Aug 2026, 09:4817,556+2
27 Aug 2026, 08:5717,554+2
26 Aug 2026, 09:0917,552+2
25 Aug 2026, 12:3717,550-6
24 Aug 2026, 12:2717,556+7
22 Aug 2026, 22:4617,549-16
20 Aug 2026, 14:3717,565-3
19 Aug 2026, 17:3517,568-16
18 Aug 2026, 17:2217,584-21
17 Aug 2026, 16:3917,605-3
16 Aug 2026, 08:4517,608-1
14 Aug 2026, 21:3317,609+3
13 Aug 2026, 11:4817,606-3
12 Aug 2026, 14:5517,609+7
11 Aug 2026, 13:1217,602-14
10 Aug 2026, 14:1217,616no change
10 Aug 2026, 13:4617,616first reading

Engagement

21 posts held, back to 24 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 35 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
21.3%
avg views ÷ 17,552 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,740
7 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
8
of 21 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 27 August 2026
Posts held21 (24 July 202627 August 2026)
Views total26,174
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken29 Aug 2026, 14:01 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
59
Videos
6
Links
7

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 29 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Recent posts

27 Aug 2026, 08:41 UTC674 viewsread 29 August 2026
Photo

上海警方侦破特大地下钱庄案:利用虚拟货币跨境换汇,涉案近 200 亿元 据澎湃新闻报道,上海市公安局于今日召开新闻发布会。其中今年以来上海警方侦破多起以虚拟货币为媒介的非法经营、洗钱案件,抓获犯罪嫌疑人 70 余名,涉案金额超 200 亿元。 其中一起特大地下钱庄案中,刘某、徐某等人自 2024 年 8 月起,未经批准以虚拟货币为结算载体,通过币商和对敲完成「人民币—虚拟货币—外币」兑换并收取手续费,涉案近 200 亿元。 警方抓获 19 人,5 人因涉嫌非法经营罪、帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪被批捕;另一起案件中,某团伙成立科技公司并搭建跨境汇兑与虚拟信用卡结算平台,涉案超 2 亿元,警方抓获 9 人。 5 人因涉嫌非法经营罪被检察机关依法批准逮捕,4 名犯罪嫌疑人被警方依法采取刑事强制措施。

25 Aug 2026, 18:15 UTC≈1,030 viewsread 29 August 2026

都说了真丸子早鸡吧落网了。不相信现在相信了吧。 上半年就说了,落网了。

21 Aug 2026, 15:09 UTC≈2,770 viewsread 29 August 2026

有人会解群组吗老外发色情内容封号了 @sndbjy

13 Aug 2026, 06:31 UTCviews —

Java逮捕 pinned «新币其实和皇冠其实是一家。 至于为什么怎么搞,因为新币会收到国际影响有很大概率崩盘。 那么皇冠可以名正言顺的取缔新币。 其实是局中局罢了。 所谓的梦幻早已远走高飞了。留下的都是新币幕后的股东布局罢了。»

9 Aug 2026, 18:02 UTC≈5,880 viewsread 29 August 2026

新币其实和皇冠其实是一家。 至于为什么怎么搞,因为新币会收到国际影响有很大概率崩盘。 那么皇冠可以名正言顺的取缔新币。 其实是局中局罢了。 所谓的梦幻早已远走高飞了。留下的都是新币幕后的股东布局罢了。

9 Aug 2026, 09:00 UTC≈5,480 viewsread 29 August 2026

新币大股东胡小伟已经被美国招安了。 这已经是最好的结局了。 但是呢在新币上押的数据,内部消息老美现在可以直接查看。 我觉得各位肯定懂这个意思吧? 老美现在可以无限利用新币。

3 Aug 2026, 11:00 UTC≈5,790 viewsread 29 August 2026

联系了几个人,柬埔寨担保只是跑路了,他只是说被抓了,只是借口。

29 Jul 2026, 14:41 UTC≈7,410 viewsread 29 August 2026
Photo

柬埔寨担保已跑路 负责人: @huhu 已注销账号 供需发布人员正在出售供需频道 @tgwifi, @jpzpp, @dava, @huhu, @timmo, @sebi, @ribi, @ss_ll, @jpzaa, @jpzzy, @jpzbb, @jpzkefu, @jpznb, @jpzvv, @jpzss, @jpzdb, @uu11mm +88806964750 | +88808673921 | +88806386917 地址余额已转走:TXFdekFzM2mVRRh6L36PPob8PPeo3vvvZm

29 Jul 2026, 14:37 UTC≈4,660 viewsread 29 August 2026

你们所谓的野鸡老担保 索隆 柬埔寨 顶级都相继跑路。

Showing the 12 most recent of 21 posts we hold for @java. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 228,913 of 1,626,711entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 10 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 29 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Java逮捕” (@java), 17,552 subscribers as measured 29 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/java.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.