Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for javaswag

Channel

javaswag

@javaswag

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

4,590subscribers

-69 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001067535601
TypeChannel
Username@javaswag
CreatedBetween 1 May 2016 and 28 February 2017 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held14
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/javaswag

Topic

Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 13 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

4,5904,6594,624.55 August 2026 — 4,659 subscribers6 August 2026 — 4,659 subscribers8 August 2026 — 4,652 subscribers12 August 2026 — 4,648 subscribers17 August 2026 — 4,642 subscribers20 August 2026 — 4,636 subscribers23 August 2026 — 4,627 subscribers26 August 2026 — 4,623 subscribers29 August 2026 — 4,617 subscribers2 September 2026 — 4,611 subscribers5 September 2026 — 4,602 subscribers11 September 2026 — 4,598 subscribers14 September 2026 — 4,591 subscribers18 September 2026 — 4,590 subscribers5 August 202618 September 2026
14 measurements spanning 44 days, net -69. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 4,580–4,669 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Sept 2026, 16:184,590-1
14 Sept 2026, 13:214,591-7
11 Sept 2026, 00:364,598-4
5 Sept 2026, 17:554,602-9
2 Sept 2026, 02:444,611-6
29 Aug 2026, 16:234,617-6
26 Aug 2026, 23:274,623-4
23 Aug 2026, 22:334,627-9
20 Aug 2026, 14:474,636-6
17 Aug 2026, 23:414,642-6
12 Aug 2026, 03:324,648-4
8 Aug 2026, 20:544,652-7
6 Aug 2026, 03:524,659no change
5 Aug 2026, 23:094,659first reading

Engagement

22 posts held, back to 10 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 7 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 22 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
6m 05s
Average length
1m 13s

Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

358 reactions across 15 posts, in 22 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 21.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥7721.5%
😁6819.0%
😎6819.0%
👍4312.0%
💯236.42%
🤔113.07%
👀102.79%
💊102.79%
🫡92.51%
🌚71.96%
61.68%
🤪51.40%
41.12%
🤣41.12%
🥴41.12%
🌭20.559%
🤝20.559%
🍌10.279%
🎉10.279%
🗿10.279%
2 further kinds20.559%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 22 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 427 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 22 most recent posts we hold, published 10 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 19:28 UTC859 views11 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

https://openjdk.org/legal/ai Оракл забанил ЭйАй сгенеренный код для ОпенЖДК, обосновывая это решение правами и юридическими вопросами интелектуальной собственности. Хотя Оракл очень много инветстирует в ЭйАй, по крайнем мере на словах, а на деле использовать нейронки можно для ревью, для дебага, но не для написания кода ( хотя как они будут отличать? ) Это временное ограничение, будем ждать обновления от Оракла, а

🤔6👀5

6 Aug 2026, 10:04 UTC924 views14 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Они открывают стартап, и ищут инвестиции. Не поверите, но вот так выглядят их питч слайды для новой компании https://www.discoveryloop.com Интересно конечно, что из этого получится. Мне почему то кажется, что их вновь купит гугл через пару лет. Хотя Джеф в причинах ухода упоминает, что в биг техе все такое неповоротливое, и что хочется свободы.. Но вот хочется ли 4 топ инженерам заниматься бухгалтерией, общением с

💯12🤝1😴1

6 Aug 2026, 09:54 UTC848 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Специально для них есть отдельный левел L11, выше в гугле просто нет. Эти двое написали кучу фундаментальных систем на которых Гугл взрастал от стартапа до корпорации.

6 Aug 2026, 09:53 UTC830 views1 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Джефф и Санжай работали вместе долгие годы, про их програмисткий дуэт есть даже статья в New Yorker https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2018/12/10/the-friendship-that-made-google-huge В письме Джефа можно посмотреть над какими проектами он поработал за 27 лет в Гугле. Просто над всем

🎉1

6 Aug 2026, 09:52 UTC≈1,110 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Демис уходит с поста генерального директора DeepMind ( или смещают ?) , а Джефф Дин и Санджай покидают Google, чтобы основать некую новую лабораторию. Интересно почему Джефф не может работать над этим же проектом внутри Гугла? И почему Демис уходит с поста СЕО?

4 Aug 2026, 11:26 UTC≈1,050 views17 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Привет! Ты просил код ревью, так вот Клод Код поревьювил, вот список того что можно исправить Привет! Спасибо за ревью, я попросил Клод Код проанализировать этот список и опубликовать новую версию Спасибо, что исправил все недочеты, вот новые комментарии от моего AI агента.. Бесит? Бесит Чтобы такого не было, как и с общими стайлгайдами, нужно создать репозиторий с общими скиллами: /отревьювь-мой-код-как-дотошны

💊9🤔3👍2🤣2🤩1

3 Aug 2026, 19:16 UTC964 views30 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @staff_engineersVideo

оркестратор агентов на простом примере

😁30

1 Aug 2026, 18:03 UTC≈1,940 views17 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

она думает, что я настоящий программист, я говорю ей, что лишь отчасти я программирую только с claude и cursor, прости

😎11👍4🤣2

31 Jul 2026, 12:13 UTC≈1,480 views46 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

Непопулярное мнение "gRPC в большинстве случаев используется не по делу..." 😎 факт 🔥 не согласен, потому что... Полный выпуск тут - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z-qkCgB1wCo

😎31🤪5🔥4🥴4👀2

29 Jul 2026, 15:39 UTC≈1,940 views17 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

Если лень разбираться, вот краткая версия

😁11🔥5🍌1

29 Jul 2026, 11:50 UTC≈1,890 views21 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Дженсон Хуанг, глава Nvidia и Сатья Надела глава Майкрософт и еще ряд других СЕО (Meta, IBM, Dell , итд) подписали письмо в поддержку открытых моделей. Хуанг даже твиттер для этого завел https://x.com/jensenhuang/status/2080643682408321103?s=46 За открытые модели выступили как раз амбассадоры открытого кода и открытых платформ (нет) Антропик ответил. https://www.anthropic.com/news/position-open-weights-models Да

🔥14🌚7

28 Jul 2026, 13:31 UTC≈1,170 views16 reactionsread 12 August 2026

У всех есть такой знакомый, ему родители подарили компьютер, он стал проводить с ним больше времени чем с людьми: сначала онлайн игры, затем моды, патчи, скрипты, задачи на паскале на уроке информатике, олимпиады по программированию, работа в шараге , работа в конторе, работа в Бигтехе и нёрдовачная изюминка ( хвост, настолки, моноколесо, кофе, падел, опенсорс, телеграм канал, подкаст, подставь свое) Такой хард скилл

😁11👀31😎1

Showing the 12 most recent of 22 posts we hold for @javaswag. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Библиотека джависта | Java, Spring, Maven, Hibernate
@javaproglib · 22,055
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 21 September 2026
Java библиотека
@javalib · 30,666
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 7 September 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“javaswag” (@javaswag), 4,590 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/javaswag.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.