Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 优质白名单预售金狗打新

Channel

优质白名单预售金狗打新

@jaxwhitelist

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

3,434subscribers

-42 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001527027243
TypeChannel
Username@jaxwhitelist
CreatedBetween 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 September 2026
Measurements held14
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 16 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/jaxwhitelist

Topic

Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 14 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 95% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

3,4293,4763,452.57 August 2026 — 3,476 subscribers7 August 2026 — 3,476 subscribers7 August 2026 — 3,475 subscribers10 August 2026 — 3,472 subscribers13 August 2026 — 3,465 subscribers16 August 2026 — 3,462 subscribers19 August 2026 — 3,457 subscribers23 August 2026 — 3,455 subscribers25 August 2026 — 3,448 subscribers28 August 2026 — 3,449 subscribers31 August 2026 — 3,444 subscribers3 September 2026 — 3,441 subscribers8 September 2026 — 3,429 subscribers12 September 2026 — 3,434 subscribers3,4347 August 202612 September 2026
14 measurements spanning 37 days, net -42. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,422–3,483 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Sept 2026, 16:013,434+5
8 Sept 2026, 23:593,429-12
3 Sept 2026, 17:163,441-3
31 Aug 2026, 11:053,444-5
28 Aug 2026, 11:233,449+1
25 Aug 2026, 21:543,448-7
23 Aug 2026, 07:563,455-2
19 Aug 2026, 10:373,457-5
16 Aug 2026, 20:583,462-3
13 Aug 2026, 09:353,465-7
10 Aug 2026, 02:523,472-3
7 Aug 2026, 13:353,475-1
7 Aug 2026, 01:303,476no change
7 Aug 2026, 01:243,476first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 10 October 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

1 reaction across 1 post, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍1100.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 10 October 2025 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 13:16 UTC130 viewsread 7 August 2026

按币安的常规操作来看 等个几天发酵的差不多 搞个几m的阴毛盘突然上也不是没有可能 只能多关注链上了

6 Aug 2026, 13:03 UTC167 viewsread 7 August 2026

robinhood上现金猫了 按cz跟币安的性格肯定要开始搞幺蛾子 目前感觉概率比较大一点的就火星跟币有 开始下注了 最近准备多看看bsc了

5 Aug 2026, 09:16 UTC212 viewsread 7 August 2026

我知道为啥翘不过了 这个没币股分红 只能等何一或cz提

3 Aug 2026, 10:32 UTC289 viewsread 7 August 2026

0xd0bc8ab397851ecfa58009d03bbc1a41fc764444 买了点这个4出来的og币有 感觉币安口号应该是定这个了 长期搞美股应该会经常发 不知道这个能不能翘蝴蝶的

30 Jul 2026, 07:49 UTC453 viewsread 7 August 2026

这波美股之战 各路天才交易员全部阵亡 链上又要开始新的组局了感觉

7 Jul 2026, 19:35 UTC909 viewsread 7 August 2026

横盘底部起来3x左右 今晚打币盘全线暴跌 盛宴结束了 只有dev爽歪歪 tcc如果跌到2-3m左右的话应该会有一波反抽

6 Jul 2026, 15:41 UTC856 views0 reactionsread 7 August 2026

0x2d6bcd0a33ed491193878b8dec10789ecea34444 等回调抄点这个打算 感觉cz2次回复可能还是有的 dev货出的差不多了

9 Mar 2026, 08:59 UTC≈2,690 views0 reactionsread 7 August 2026

一堆炒ai的 一晚上机器人帮忙赚10u说躺赚开心的不行 我记得以前炒币的不都是一晚上千万 普通人搞ai真进得去那个圈子赚钱吗

25 Nov 2025, 05:20 UTC≈3,980 views0 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Binance EN: $BNBHOLDER live on Binance alpha 币安重要公告: $BNBHOLDER 在 Binance alpha 上上线 最火的时候不上现在上

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @jaxwhitelist. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

QK哈希实时观战频道
@lookqk · 49,194
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 28 August 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“优质白名单预售金狗打新” (@jaxwhitelist), 3,434 subscribers as measured 12 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/jaxwhitelist.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.