File, posted without a caption

Channel
𝟏𝟕.
@jdksmxb
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
1,012subscribers
+237 since we began measuring on 22 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002238869128 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @jdksmxb |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 22 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 18 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/jdksmxb |
Topic
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 19 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 40% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Sept 2026, 07:58 | 1,012 | +9 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 19:18 | 1,003 | -3 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 16:19 | 1,006 | +237 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 08:24 | 769 | -4 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 15:17 | 773 | -2 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 22:45 | 775 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 16 November 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 17 April 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
70 reactions across 10 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 52.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5323811666486379562 | 37 | 52.9% | |
| custom 5325639110646314677 | 33 | 47.1% |
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 70 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 16 November 2025 to 17 April 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
дикк ойла еш ла дехайш цунг просто🙂↔️
File, posted without a caption
есть разница между «сдаться» и «понять, что с тебя хватит»
хочу так, чтоб навсегда, нежно, доверчиво, и без измен)
"я тебя люблю" это означает, что я здесь не только ради красивых мест и счастливых дней. я здесь и для тяжёлых и плохих дней. я здесь, несмотря ни на что.
когда мужчина любит, мутных ситуаций не бывает
и если он вернется к тебе сломанным, сломай то, что от него осталось
никто не поймёт, что я в нём нашла. ведь никто не видел его влюбленных глаз, не слышал наши разговоры наедине и не знает, каким нежным и добрым он бывает со мной.
-как ты поняла, что любишь его? -каждый раз, когда он смотрел на меня, по моей коже пробегались мурашки, даже когда я увидела его впервые, в моей груди что-то екнуло, я это почувствовала, хотя знаете, в первый раз он мне совсем не понравился, а потом я сошла с ума. я просто сходила с ума от этих глаз, от этого гордого и нежного взгляда. я смотрела на его лицо и ничего не видела кроме этих больших зеленых глаз. та…
File, posted without a caption
custom 53238116664863795623custom 53256391106463146771
знаете какое качество я ценю в себе? я могу безумно любить человека, отдавая свою душу на 100%. могу прощать все на свете. долго. без упрёков. могу делать первые шаги. но… но если человек не начнёт ценить это через определенное время и будет вести себя также, я могу с лёгкостью забыть человека и отвернуться от него. бесповоротно.
custom 53256391106463146774custom 53238116664863795622
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @jdksmxb. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@Colibri_bots · 133,831
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 48 here — alongside 47 others — read 22 August 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“𝟏𝟕.” (@jdksmxb), 1,012 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/jdksmxb.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.