Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for jebashu crypto.

Channel

jebashu crypto.

@jebashushitposting

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts recorded as deleted · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

6,157subscribers

-140 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001365169647
TypeChannel
Username@jebashushitposting
Descriptionдеген. щитпост. профиты. владелец - @yb3222 по рекламе - @yb3222
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live5 November 2026
Measurements held22
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 5 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/jebashushitposting

Topic

Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 48% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

6,1576,2976,2277 August 2026 — 6,297 subscribers7 August 2026 — 6,293 subscribers10 August 2026 — 6,288 subscribers13 August 2026 — 6,285 subscribers20 August 2026 — 6,282 subscribers24 August 2026 — 6,275 subscribers27 August 2026 — 6,264 subscribers30 August 2026 — 6,256 subscribers2 September 2026 — 6,259 subscribers7 September 2026 — 6,267 subscribers15 September 2026 — 6,259 subscribers26 September 2026 — 6,235 subscribers5 October 2026 — 6,225 subscribers11 October 2026 — 6,211 subscribers15 October 2026 — 6,206 subscribers18 October 2026 — 6,204 subscribers21 October 2026 — 6,195 subscribers24 October 2026 — 6,175 subscribers27 October 2026 — 6,167 subscribers30 October 2026 — 6,165 subscribers2 November 2026 — 6,160 subscribers5 November 2026 — 6,157 subscribers7 August 20265 November 2026
22 measurements spanning 90 days, net -140. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,136–6,318 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 22
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
5 Nov 2026, 03:456,157-3
2 Nov 2026, 11:386,160-5
30 Oct 2026, 21:346,165-2
27 Oct 2026, 14:466,167-8
24 Oct 2026, 11:166,175-20
21 Oct 2026, 07:006,195-9
18 Oct 2026, 03:166,204-2
15 Oct 2026, 02:106,206-5
11 Oct 2026, 19:576,211-14
5 Oct 2026, 08:366,225-10
26 Sept 2026, 18:376,235-24
15 Sept 2026, 08:596,259-8
7 Sept 2026, 00:596,267+8
2 Sept 2026, 06:576,259+3
30 Aug 2026, 11:286,256-8
27 Aug 2026, 10:136,264-11
24 Aug 2026, 01:236,275-7
20 Aug 2026, 07:086,282-3
13 Aug 2026, 09:586,285-3
10 Aug 2026, 09:386,288first reading

Engagement

30 posts held, back to 31 December 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 15 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
33.2%
avg views ÷ 6,157 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,050
6 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.00%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
6
of 30 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 November 2026
Posts held30 (31 December 2025 – 2 November 2026)
Views total12,280
Reactions total123
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Nov 2026, 16:49 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈1,830
Videos
≈85
Links
≈866

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
14s
Average length
14s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

737 reactions across 27 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 25.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
😁18925.6%
❤18024.4%
👍14419.5%
🤡8912.1%
🔥608.14%
😱263.53%
😭162.17%
🖕111.49%
🕊70.95%
🏆60.814%
💯60.814%
❤‍🔥10.136%
🌭10.136%
🐳10.136%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 27 of the 30 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 737 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 30 most recent posts we hold, published 31 December 2025 to 2 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
31
across the posts below
Posts paid on
9
of 29 we hold a reading for · 31%
Most on one post
7
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @jebashushitposting. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 30 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 31 December 2025 to 2 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 1 of 6 posts held from the last 30 days (16.7%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

2 Nov 2026, 17:28 UTC≈1,130 views37 reactionsread 6 November 2026

будьте готовы к тому, что мы уйдем гораздо ниже и везде будет кровь но и не не удивляйтесь, если мы улетим выше и станем сказочно богаты 🤑

😁29🤡3😭3💯1🖕1

18 Oct 2026, 08:14 UTC≈2,250 views9 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

Залутал WL в хайповый фриминт Fomies По дате минта и саплаю пока что инфы нет, но по вайбику хайпик имеется есть еще кто залутал вл? что ждем по флору?

🖕5❤3🌭1

16 Oct 2026, 12:33 UTC≈2,160 views11 reactions1 Starread 6 November 2026
Photo

Redo оживили рынок подарков телеграм Еще года полтора назад я писал, что рынок подарков скатывается в пизду и ничего интересного нас не ждет, в принципе все так и произошло Последние коллекции выходили в -50% после улучшений и ничего интересного не показали Но вот редошки дали новую жизнь и надежду, что фигурки Дурова и Самолетики покажут себя так же хорошо Кстати мой редо на черном фоне по текущим оценивается в …

👍9❤2

13 Oct 2026, 19:11 UTC≈2,090 views40 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

Играть на дуелбете - смарт мув! У ребят появились месячные гонки с реально достойными наградами - около 1kk$ + поинты которые можно переводить в токен проекта на TGE Поэтому теперь вы не только гемблите, но и гарантированно лутаете монетки от проекта Планируют сжигать саплай за счет байбека, оч нравится эта идея (такая мета сейчас, буду по максам фармить токены на объеме)

🤡24😁7👍3🖕3❤1💯1😭1

11 Oct 2026, 12:48 UTC≈2,300 views15 reactionsread 6 November 2026

мнение? 😹 давненько я черный фон не ловил https://t.me/nft/ResistanceDog-10465

🔥12❤3

8 Oct 2026, 13:34 UTC≈2,560 views14 reactions1 Starread 6 November 2026

крипта снова в режиме «выживет сильнейший» все проебали «дно» битка и етх, поэтому в погоне хоть за чем то ушли в щитки и нфт, но и тут подъебали почти всех просто дайте еще пару котлет на какой нибудь ноубрейн хуйне и я ливну с этого болота 🙏

❤14

25 Sept 2026, 16:13 UTC≈3,320 views61 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

После 6 месяцев перерыва от казика депнул сегодня в duelbet и словил легкий заносик 🤙🏻 По вайбику гораздо приятнее играть тут, ртп как будто ощутимо выше и бонусы приятные крч пацаны лудить не советую, но если есть желание рискнуть вечнозелеными, то только тут

🤡36😁16💯4❤2👍2❤‍🔥1

15 Sept 2026, 12:21 UTC≈3,660 views37 reactions1 Starread 6 November 2026
Photo

зачем работать, если виртуальная лицензия в понзи приносит мне по 250$ в день? 🤔 примерно 91k$ в год на пассиве 😎

😁27🤡6❤3🐳1

12 Sept 2026, 14:08 UTC≈3,280 views23 reactions7 Starsread 6 November 2026
Photo

бычка бычкой, а вот заклеймить фришные 20-30$ в солане никогда не будет лишним тут :)

😁17🤡6

28 Aug 2026, 12:26 UTC≈3,610 views16 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

депнул 15 етх в раффл и даже не в топ 100 лфг 😹 гоу аква 2.0 и расход

😁15❤1

Showing the 12 most recent of 30 posts we hold for @jebashushitposting. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Posts recorded as deleted after publishing

We recorded 1 post on @jebashushitposting as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.

A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.

First seen missing
4 November 2026
Most recent seen missing
4 November 2026
Median time before seen missing
3 months
Seen missing in the last 30 days
1

Polls

The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

5 Feb 2026, 15:41 UTCAnonymous Poll635 voters

че происходит?

  1. я вахуе21%
  2. пиздец17%
  3. мне похуй я уже обнулился62%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

4 Feb 2026, 18:49 UTCAnonymous Poll740 voters

Откупаешь дип?

  1. Да, закупился по текущим +-20%
  2. Нет, жду ниже :)36%
  3. Обнулился15%
  4. Нищий29%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 30 most recent posts we hold, published 31 December 2025 to 2 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 9 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

DanieL Finance Team🤑
@nftdaniel · 18,945
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 4 October 2026
Алекс о Крипте
@alexincrypta · 17,142
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 54 here — alongside 53 others — read 3 October 2026
Фруто Сrypto Няня
@frutocrypto · 19,672
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 49 here — alongside 48 others — read 22 September 2026
Коля флипает
@sol_TOP · 40,033
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 58 here — alongside 57 others — read 30 August 2026
Crypto Abuzik
@CryptoAbuzik · 20,744
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 23 September 2026
ꜱᴇɪɴᴀʀᴜᴋɪʀᴏ
@seinarukiro · 78,700
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 22 September 2026
BIG BALLS BIRDS
@big_balls_birds · 19,171
Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 30 September 2026
sad cat
@sadcatgamble · 27,587
Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 54 here — alongside 53 others — read 10 September 2026
SWOP TOKY | CRYPTO MEDIA
@swoptoky · 30,846
Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 5 September 2026
Lazy Crypto
@lazycryp · 28,354
Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 8 September 2026
TTC | TimeToCrypto
@nftTTC · 33,722
Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 2 September 2026
ТЕМКА В СХЕМКЕ
@TVS_TEAM · 37,345
Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 31 August 2026
Crypto BOOM
@booms_crypto · 21,857
Telegram ranks this channel #62 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 3 October 2026
Banlife теперь в Telegram
@banlife_crypto · 21,273
Telegram ranks this channel #70 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 24 September 2026
Ворк в крипте, только хардкор
@workIncrypts · 32,967
Telegram ranks this channel #72 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 3 September 2026
Sugar Calls
@sugarydick · 33,082
Telegram ranks this channel #77 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 4 September 2026

This channel appears in 17 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 16 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“jebashu crypto.” (@jebashushitposting), 6,157 subscribers as measured 5 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/jebashushitposting.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.