Deepfake: por qué un chat o una foto ya no prueban nada Una captura de WhatsApp con fecha, hora y nombre del contacto solía bastar para cerrar una discusión. Hoy esa misma…
🤔4❤2

Channel
@jesusnr069
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
6,983subscribers
-188 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001846336767 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @jesusnr069 |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 13 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 18 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/jesusnr069 |
Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 93% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Sept 2026, 03:16 | 6,983 | -15 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 15:01 | 6,998 | -25 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 11:19 | 7,023 | -26 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 23:37 | 7,049 | -18 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 15:25 | 7,067 | -22 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 12:17 | 7,089 | -12 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 05:22 | 7,101 | -22 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 21:49 | 7,123 | -3 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 07:22 | 7,126 | -17 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 03:08 | 7,143 | -10 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 23:42 | 7,153 | -13 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 16:03 | 7,166 | -5 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 21:31 | 7,171 | first reading |
21 posts held, back to 30 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 11 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 21 posts for this entry, the most recent from 13 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
92 reactions across 21 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 65.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 60 | 65.2% | |
| 👍 | 13 | 14.1% | |
| 🤔 | 8 | 8.70% | |
| 🔥 | 5 | 5.43% | |
| 😱 | 5 | 5.43% | |
| 😁 | 1 | 1.09% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 21 of the 21 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 92 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 21 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 13 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Deepfake: por qué un chat o una foto ya no prueban nada Una captura de WhatsApp con fecha, hora y nombre del contacto solía bastar para cerrar una discusión. Hoy esa misma…
🤔4❤2
Meta pagará 567 millones extra por dañar a menores en EE.UU. Meta ya debe casi 942 millones de dólares en Nuevo México, y la cifra sigue creciendo. Un juez ordenó este…
😱5👍1
Heyyy. que pasa gente? Para mantener el contenido más organizado, he tomado la decisión de separar un poco los temas. Este canal seguirá funcionando tal cual como hasta ahora. Aquí seguiré compartiendo mis videos de YouTube, noticias de tecnología, tendencias y todos los trucos. Sin embargo, he creado un canal nuevo (https://t.me/nunezapps ) pensado para las personas que me siguen hace años únicamente poe el conten…
👍5🔥3🤔2😁1
Starlink Mobile promete superar a AT&T, Verizon y T-Mobile en EE.UU. Starlink acaba de dejar claro que no quiere ser solo un parche para las zonas sin cobertura celular: quiere robarle…
❤5
Disney ficha a TikTok tras el fracaso de su acuerdo con Sora Antes de firmar con TikTok, Disney ya había apostado por que la inteligencia artificial generara vídeos con sus personajes. Ese…
❤3
Phishing en Microsoft: así roban cuentas sin robar contraseñas Olvida el candado verde, el dominio bien escrito y la ortografía perfecta como señales de alerta. Una campaña de phishing…
❤1
WhatsApp lanza @Todos: así cambian tus chats grupales Ese chat familiar de 40 personas que tienes silenciado desde 2023 ya no te va a salvar. WhatsApp confirmó este…
❤1🤔1
¿Tu celular te escucha? El experimento de los “anuncios de comida para gatos” Durante media hora, dos teléfonos quedaron aislados en una habitación mientras un altavoz reproducía, en bucle, un audio sobre comida…
❤6
5 apps gratis para descargar más rápido, organizar tus archivos y editar PDF Si eres de los que descarga archivos pesados seguido, se pelea con PDFs a diario, o tiene el celular lleno…
❤5
Stims: la app minimalista que mantiene la pantalla encendida solo donde tú quieres Seguro te ha pasado: estás siguiendo una receta de cocina con las manos llenas de harina, o leyendo una partitura,…
❤3
Amaze File Utilities De los desarrolladores de la aplicación de código abierto Amaze File Manager. Una aplicación de código abierto para ver, administrar…
❤4
Amaze File Manager Información general: – Open Source, ligero y suave – Sobre la base de las directrices de diseño de materiales –…
❤4
Showing the 12 most recent of 21 posts we hold for @jesusnr069. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Núñez Tech” (@jesusnr069), 6,983 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/jesusnr069.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.