Channel

j e y k i

@jeyki1

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

161subscribers

+85 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID	-1003745991450
Type	Channel
Username	@jeyki1
Created	7 June 2026 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded	9 August 2026
Last confirmed live	18 September 2026
Measurements held	8
Confirmed unchanged	1 time, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegram	t.me/jeyki1

Growth

8 measurements spanning 43 days, net +85. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 63–174 and does not start at zero.

Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)	Subscribers	Change
18 Sept 2026, 16:16	161	+6
10 Sept 2026, 09:15	155	+2
1 Sept 2026, 02:05	153	+6
24 Aug 2026, 10:06	147	+2
15 Aug 2026, 17:23	145	+68
9 Aug 2026, 20:30	77	no change
7 Aug 2026, 09:34	77	+1
6 Aug 2026, 14:02	76	first reading

Engagement

4 posts held, back to 7 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 4 posts for this entry, the most recent from 16 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

34 reactions across 2 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction	Count	Share
custom 5267500801240092311	12	35.3%
custom 5440660757194744323	8	23.5%
custom 5257960214291823402	4	11.8%
custom 5220037761897085778	3	8.82%
custom 5413889190951666255	2	5.88%
custom 5427168083074628963	2	5.88%
custom 5456140674028019486	2	5.88%
custom 5201873447554145566	1	2.94%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 2 of the 4 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 34 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 4 most recent posts we hold, published 7 June 2026 to 16 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Mentions

Named by 25 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

dvrkfantasy r.i.p.
@dvrkfantasy · 3877 posts TERESHII4EYES
@tereshiiq · 902 posts youngmix
@youngmix11 · 82 posts DJ 4 (mixed by akamaru)
@akamarumixing · 461 post ayy global tags
@ayyglobaltags · 2,1941 post cashdream
@cashdreamtg · 231 post artwork by chronosphere
@chronodraw · 321 post 2ell3oy
@ell3oyy · 1091 post FonsarK
@fonsark · 1951 post хроники 4n Way | Leaky Leaks 6
@four_N_way · 1,0071 post Fedro
@fuckkfedro · 1031 post к черту
@fukit700 · 1141 post G&P
@gnpdidit · 231 post Swaggh2
@guappa777 · 271 post ihatesofa #pedał
@ihatesofaa · 331 post k1ndrss
@k1ndrss · 381 post KSIKER
@ksiker · 801 post nohomo
@nohomogg · 731 post radiant
@radiant_228 · 1061 post aloneplugg
@trueplugerrr · 251 post WG RECORDS
@wgrec · 1081 post Damn Young Flexer, where you been?💣
@Y0ungFl3x3r · 1061 post YUGOSLOVE
@yol_mus · 5791 post Stet$
@YoungStetS · 581 post

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

FLINERGY⚡️
@FLINERGY · 2062 posts jeyki
@jeyki0 · 4,9961 post

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“j e y k i” (@jeyki1), 161 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/jeyki1.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.