Channel
@jiaodanbao
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
633subscribers
-1,329 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001838236608 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Usernames | @auction_news @jiaodanbao |
| Created | 23 November 2022 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 17 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 17 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/jiaodanbao |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 65% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Sept 2026, 16:39 | 633 | -1,332 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 04:39 | 1,965 | +1,342 |
| 7 Sept 2026, 14:56 | 623 | -1,341 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 13:53 | 1,964 | +1,352 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 02:43 | 612 | -1,350 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 05:04 | 1,962 | +1 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 00:03 | 1,961 | no change |
| 24 Aug 2026, 21:23 | 1,961 | +2 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 13:55 | 1,959 | -1 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 23:46 | 1,960 | -1 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 16:09 | 1,961 | -1 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 18:56 | 1,962 | no change |
| 14 Aug 2026, 15:47 | 1,962 | -1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 10:50 | 1,963 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 09:48 | 1,963 | +1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 11:17 | 1,962 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 11:05 | 1,962 | first reading |
6 posts held, back to 23 November 2022 — the reader has reached the start of this channel’s public history, so this is the full archive Telegram still exposes. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 6 posts for this entry, the most recent from 13 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
25 reactions across 1 post, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 25 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 1 of the 6 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 25 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 6 most recent posts we hold, published 23 November 2022 to 13 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
@xinbi81 @xinbi07 👥 NFT @bx_000 @eo_000 @ef_888 @ep_888 @uf_888 @jf_888 @fd_888 @ul_888 @uq_888 @bi_888 @oh_888 @or_888 @xj_888 @um_888 @ve_888 @hs_888 @tq_888 @rq_888 @po_888 🍔🍔🍔🍔🍔🍔🍔🍔 @taiguoboss @dongnanyaboss @yinnijituan @malaivip @memev @memecycle @memeverse @taiwankefu @hanguokefu @ribenkefu @jilongpokefu
someone outbid on my @auction_news username while i sleep! if we don't get it back, we will change our main channel! so join @lelang_username to keep you updated! we may develop our never-get-outbid-bot in the next few weeks or so!
5分钟试用期。通常情况下，NFT或非NFT用户名不会被屏蔽！最新更新很有意思。现在，屏蔽是针对频道/群组/ID，而不是针对@NFT。所以，如果你购买了一个 NFT 用户名（全新的 NFT），你尝试在搜索中搜索，用户名出现，然后你将其制作成 NFT 并将其附加到你的频道/群组/机器人，然后查看结果。 如果您在将 NFT 分配给频道后仍然找不到该 NFT 用户名，我可以肯定地告诉您，您的频道已被影子禁言！
👍25
现在是购买用户名的最佳时机
NFT用户名设置教程与上链教程 NFT用户名设置教程: 打开官网:www.fragment.com 登入Tonkeeper钱包和分配的Telegram账号 点击钱包My Assets 点击Assign to Telegram 点击Assign分配成功 回到Telegram个人信息用户名 点击显示 NFT用户名上链教程: 打开官网:www.fragment.com 登入Tonkeeper钱包和要上链的Telegram账号 点击钱包Convertto Collectibles 点击Place on Auction 返回到telegram账号输入二步验证 返回网站设置价格最低10TON 开始拍卖没人竞价7天之后上链成功 ✈️ @ton_bag @gotsofar
Channel created
Showing the 6 most recent of 6 posts we hold for @jiaodanbao. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Named by 24 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@jiaodanbao named 4 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“RF.RU - Регистратор и магазин доменов в зонах .рф и .ru. Нейминг и брендинг.” (@jiaodanbao), 633 subscribers as measured 15 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/jiaodanbao.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.