Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Jiliguala Calls 🥕

Channel

Jiliguala Calls 🥕

@jiliguala99

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

2,338subscribers

-18 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001796613501
TypeChannel
Username@jiliguala99
CreatedBetween 1 January 2022 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded11 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 September 2026
Measurements held12
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/jiliguala99

Topic

Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 15 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 50% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

2,3382,3562,34711 August 2026 — 2,356 subscribers11 August 2026 — 2,356 subscribers15 August 2026 — 2,353 subscribers18 August 2026 — 2,350 subscribers21 August 2026 — 2,348 subscribers24 August 2026 — 2,346 subscribers27 August 2026 — 2,345 subscribers30 August 2026 — 2,344 subscribers2 September 2026 — 2,342 subscribers8 September 2026 — 2,341 subscribers12 September 2026 — 2,339 subscribers15 September 2026 — 2,338 subscribers11 August 202615 September 2026
12 measurements spanning 36 days, net -18. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,335–2,359 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Sept 2026, 23:172,338-1
12 Sept 2026, 10:022,339-2
8 Sept 2026, 00:402,341-1
2 Sept 2026, 14:392,342-2
30 Aug 2026, 17:322,344-1
27 Aug 2026, 11:552,345-1
24 Aug 2026, 21:552,346-2
21 Aug 2026, 03:422,348-2
18 Aug 2026, 06:052,350-3
15 Aug 2026, 03:182,353-3
11 Aug 2026, 11:042,356no change
11 Aug 2026, 09:462,356first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 15 September 2024the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 24 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

67 reactions across 19 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 47.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
3247.8%
👍1420.9%
💯913.4%
🤯68.96%
🔥22.99%
🥰22.99%
🎉11.49%
🤡11.49%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 67 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 15 September 2024 to 24 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

24 Jun 2026, 04:06 UTC637 views3 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

#mame, 10m第一个里程碑 牛逼的团队 熟悉的味道 遗憾的是没给机会DIP~~~ 0xe92f7fe3eaf61df28b7b75f3faab199333c42302

3

21 Jun 2026, 05:05 UTC663 views5 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

明晚八点预售 九点发射🕘 https://x.com/mamebnb/status/2068542610567025012?s=20

3👍1🥰1

30 May 2026, 16:42 UTC723 views3 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

https://x.com/xBrianSumner https://x.com/komabnb KOMA2.0 即将来袭,曾经在低迷的市场,老布用自己的力量撼动了BSC的行情。这一次他将再次带领社区打破这PVP的市场! 备:这次阵仗还可以,老布,JK,老鬼都挺FOMO

2👍1

18 Sept 2025, 23:12 UTC866 views9 reactionsread 11 August 2026

做交易 要靠自己 跟做人一样 靠自己 别靠任何人 看到别人赚钱别嫉妒别羡慕也别盲目崇拜 看到别人亏钱也别踩别嘲笑 做好自己的交易 过好自己的生活 市场上的币和X上的人都一样 我们要拨开迷雾看到真相 别凑热闹 别当乌合之众 别扎堆 去寂寞孤独的地方 找属于你自己的ALPHA

6👍3

10 Oct 2024, 15:14 UTC≈3,540 views1 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

😯这线走的像貔貅 全部加池子 格局很大 0x7b7af2f5414fb6daeea39e811cf288380323f889 https://t.me/babyneiroreal

💯1

10 Oct 2024, 12:12 UTC≈2,770 views6 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

$MARU 2M !!!!!!!!!! One step at a time.🤩

3👍3

9 Oct 2024, 17:15 UTC≈2,240 views0 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

还是熟悉的味道 老布牛逼 ☺️ 0xd5eaaac47bd1993d661bc087e15dfb079a7f3c19 https://t.me/komacoinbsc

9 Oct 2024, 06:03 UTC≈1,920 views1 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

🔶$BABYNEIRO 最近Bsc预售多起来了 不知道哪个队 也许New Team 朋友跟我说不错 40/0.2B 应该是买不了吃亏系列吧😯 https://www.pinksale.finance/launchpad/bsc/0x5Aa337FD6B67E38FF868fdc94D34B60C2Af0Ae7f https://t.me/babyneiroreal

👍1

9 Oct 2024, 03:54 UTC≈1,440 views3 reactionsread 11 August 2026

$MARU 1M !!!!!!!! 认真做事的总能得到回报 希望接下来每一天都能爬坡❤️❤️❤️

2🎉1

7 Oct 2024, 13:29 UTC≈1,700 views2 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

🔶 $KOMA GHC新盘 HC 300/1.25BNB DOXX➕KYCED 看起来不错的 我觉得可以玩 好久没玩白名单了 Make Bsc Great Again!!! https://www.pinksale.finance/launchpad/bsc/0x497CAc1A0b1458fA900D1e9C73071Ac0ed975853 https://t.me/komacoinbsc

2

7 Oct 2024, 02:21 UTC≈1,080 views6 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

高位追的也捡钱 Ath sooooooon! Let time speak.🫶🫶🫶

4💯2

6 Oct 2024, 11:16 UTC≈1,280 views4 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

一个比较老的代币了 k走的挺好 社区也活跃 目前在横盘状态 我在这位置持有一个包 继续观察 hold 🥳 DbaSVQ87gQumixFumMHCrMKFpq5dSYNtKiVNDw3Vpump https://t.me/inuonsolana

2🔥1🥰1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @jiliguala99. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

互联网观察
@guanchahulw · 67,029
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 20 August 2026
Squirrel Calls 🥜🐿
@SquirrelChannel · 25,404
Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 17 September 2026
Squirrel💕Barbie Ventures
@SquirrelBarbieGem · 26,105
Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 17 September 2026
Btok News
@BtokMedia · 288,827
Telegram ranks this channel #68 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 17 August 2026

This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Jiliguala Calls 🥕” (@jiliguala99), 2,338 subscribers as measured 15 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/jiliguala99.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.