马来西亚🇲🇾吉隆坡(小黑)莞式选妃频道 pinned a photo

Channel
马来西亚🇲🇾吉隆坡(小黑)莞式选妃频道
@jilongpoxf
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
24,484subscribers
-1,841 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002666975369 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @jilongpoxf |
| Created | Between 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 9 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 27 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 9 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/jilongpoxf |
Topic
Gambling & betting — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Sept 2026, 02:38 | 24,484 | -75 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 19:39 | 24,559 | -52 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 16:00 | 24,611 | -36 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 08:52 | 24,647 | -78 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 05:58 | 24,725 | -52 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 04:06 | 24,777 | -27 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 02:24 | 24,804 | -25 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 22:57 | 24,829 | -296 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 19:54 | 25,125 | -19 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 17:36 | 25,144 | -37 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 18:22 | 25,181 | -98 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 21:16 | 25,279 | -67 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 04:35 | 25,346 | -71 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 14:15 | 25,417 | -25 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 16:54 | 25,442 | -38 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 13:22 | 25,480 | -84 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 16:45 | 25,564 | -109 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 16:17 | 25,673 | -90 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 08:52 | 25,763 | -61 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 20:15 | 25,824 | first reading |
Engagement
420 posts held, back to 31 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 67 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 2.05%
- avg views ÷ 24,484 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 503
- 222 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.128%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 320
- of 420 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 5 of 222 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 420 (31 July 2026 – 3 September 2026) |
| Views total | 111,585 |
| Reactions total | 4 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 3 Sept 2026, 08:44 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 3m 04s
- Average length
- 12s
Measured directly from 16 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
5 reactions across 5 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 80.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 4 | 80.0% | |
| 👍 | 1 | 20.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 420 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 5 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 420 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 3 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
😀😀 😀😀 😀😀 😀😀 😀😀 😀 选平台,看实力! ⭐ 多元化娱乐一键畅玩: 🌭 电子| 视讯| 体育 | 棋牌 | 捕鱼 |彩票 ⭐ 百亿护航 · 实力背书 · 华人首选 😀大额秒提|信誉保障|顶奢品牌 😄 实时盘口|全球同步|数据透明 😀RMB玩家点击注册 😀USDT玩家点击注册 😀官方代理:@kaiyun27225206 😀官方客服:在线客服 😀官方频道:@kaiyun27225206gf 😀官方网址:开云体育点击进入 😀😀😀😀😀😀😀 😀官方飞投直营 😀官方在线娱乐
马来西亚🇲🇾吉隆坡(小黑)莞式选妃频道 pinned a GIF
😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀 📱📱📱📱📱📱📱📱 📱 资金储备 2亿U|全网上押 5000万U 📱 秒充秒提|大额秒审|100%保障出款 😀 大额无忧,信誉保证,老字号的底气就是安全! uu365国际(U)版 |最权威综合📱台 专注全球体育赛事,覆盖主流联赛,提供稳定、流畅、高效的综合娱乐体验。 ⚽️世界杯| ⚡️欧洲杯| 😀五大联赛| 🥴NBA 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 官方高清观赛入口:😀www.uu365.live 😀 😉😉😉😉 🙂↕️🤪😏☹️🙂↕️🙂↕️ 😀😀😀 😀😀😀 😀😀😀 😀😀😀 📱📱📱📱📱📱 1、 黄金摇钱树 爆 354倍爆得 88.5万U 2、365体育世界杯之战 大哥一天狂砍690万U 3、PG电子赏金女王爆发取250万U 4、神秘大哥 BG视讯稳定输出一天净赚282万U 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 【uu365国际|全网福利天花板】 ⚡️ 全网最大福利 首存赠送 100% ⚡️ 迎新礼遇① 首存好礼 3888U!…
马来西亚🇲🇾吉隆坡(小黑)莞式选妃频道 pinned a GIF
😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀 📱📱📱📱📱📱📱📱 📱 资金储备 2亿U|全网上押 5000万U 📱 秒充秒提|大额秒审|100%保障出款 😀 大额无忧,信誉保证,老字号的底气就是安全! uu365国际(U)版 |最权威综合📱台 专注全球体育赛事,覆盖主流联赛,提供稳定、流畅、高效的综合娱乐体验。 ⚽️世界杯| ⚡️欧洲杯| 😀五大联赛| 🥴NBA 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 官方高清观赛入口:😀www.uu365.live 😀 😉😉😉😉 🙂↕️🤪😏☹️🙂↕️🙂↕️ 😀😀😀 😀😀😀 😀😀😀 😀😀😀 📱📱📱📱📱📱 1、 黄金摇钱树 爆 354倍爆得 88.5万U 2、365体育世界杯之战 大哥一天狂砍690万U 3、PG电子赏金女王爆发取250万U 4、神秘大哥 BG视讯稳定输出一天净赚282万U 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 【uu365国际|全网福利天花板】 ⚡️ 全网最大福利 首存赠送 100% ⚡️ 迎新礼遇① 首存好礼 3888U!…
马来西亚🇲🇾吉隆坡(小黑)莞式选妃频道 pinned a photo
🔥新山,吉隆坡,印尼🇲🇾顶级电子烟🚬 ✨震撼来袭 全新升级一口爆 🙋♀️🙋♀️🙋♀️🙋♀️🙋♀️ 🥇全马来最纯正的依托,纯度百分之99,专业定制配比,口感柔和,不头痛🤕 🍇🥭🍉接口味,比例定制,量大从优👍 🤝代理可谈🤝 🐉🐉🐉🐉🐉🐉 😘欢迎新老客户下单😘 🔥 安全闪送到家🏠 🧐🧐🧐🧐🧐:@Datoudzy 🧐🧐🧐🧐🧐:@Datoudzy1 🧐🧐🧐🧐🧐:@Datoudzy2
马来西亚🇲🇾吉隆坡(小黑)莞式选妃频道 pinned a photo
🫰🫰🫰吉隆坡⭐️级酒店🫰🫰🫰 📱📱📱📱📱📱 下午1️⃣点 👍凌晨3️⃣点 👍👍 😄中国🇨🇳 😄韩国🇰🇷 😄日本🇯🇵 😄越南🇻🇳 😄马来西亚😳 🏳️🌈🏳️🌈🏳️🌈🏳️🌈🏳️🌈🏳️🌈🏳️🌈🏳️🌈 🫰Incall (堂食) 🫰Outcall (外送2炮以上) 🫰Overnight (过夜) 🫰 All Day (包天) ⬇️⬇️⬇️⬇️⬇️⬇️⬇️⬇️⬇️⬇️⬇️ 😵0178958689 KC 📱📱📱📱 @Kc8689 📱飞机频道 https://t.me/Kc_klescort ⬇️⬇️⬇️⬇️⬇️⬇️⬇️⬇️⬇️⬇️⬇️ 地标🏷️ Kl Area(吉隆坡区) 😄https://t.me/Kc_Klescort Subang Area(苏邦区) 😄https://t.me/Kc_Subangescort PJ Area(八达岭再也) 😄https://t.me/Kc_Pjesc…
马来西亚🇲🇾吉隆坡(小黑)莞式选妃频道 pinned Deleted message
马来西亚🇲🇾吉隆坡(小黑)莞式选妃频道 pinned Deleted message
Showing the 12 most recent of 420 posts we hold for @jilongpoxf. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
@UU365guoji · 48,98378 postsuu365专家预测
@uu365zj · 63978 postsKc_Dmsescort
@Kc_Dmsescort · 3851 postsKc_Klescort
@Kc_Klescort · 37651 postsKc_Pjescort
@Kc_Pjescort · 6551 postsKc_SubangEscort
@Kc_Subangescort · 11451 posts开云体育-官方
@kaiyun27225206gf · 93549 postsM8体育官方频道
@m8ty11 · 1,61836 posts6U.com|客服中心
@PG6U_com · 69728 posts6U.com|保证金查验教程
@WWW_6Ucom · 13628 postsMK体育
@MK888bot · 11,70217 postsVIP 稳单 |体育竞猜大本营
@shijiebei8qun · 34,7887 postsUU9.COM国际官方频道
@UU9_COM · 8,4407 posts
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“马来西亚🇲🇾吉隆坡(小黑)莞式选妃频道” (@jilongpoxf), 24,484 subscribers as measured 9 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/jilongpoxf.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.