“我不是音乐家,但我喜欢听你的颤音” 在线 开课

Channel
秘密㊙️小天地
@jingse6688
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1,836subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 October 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1004401372173 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @jingse6688 |
| Description | 没回消息+扣扣 3848252907 |
| First recorded | 7 October 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 7 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/jingse6688 |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Oct 2026, 15:22 | 1,836 | no change |
| 7 Oct 2026, 14:47 | 1,836 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 16 September 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 45.3%
- avg views ÷ 1,836 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 833
- 20 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.038%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 20
- of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 6 of 20 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 October 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (16 September 2026 – 7 October 2026) |
| Views total | 16,650 |
| Reactions total | 2 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Oct 2026, 15:22 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 89
- Videos
- 1
- Links
- 9
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
2 reactions across 2 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 2 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 16 September 2026 to 7 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
好久不见 开课啦
红休宝宝们
好呀宝宝们,开课咯,欢迎来实战
【所属群组】:西安一品楼 【时间】:2026-09-23 【老师】:景瑟 【留名】:北风飕飕 【人照】:8.5 【颜值】:8.5 【身材】:9 【服务】:9 【态度】:10 【环境】:9 【综合】:9 【过程】:老师服务非常耐心,整体出击过程非常舒适,人照8.5分,手法非常好,尤其是正面胸推的时候非常认真,做的非常细致,和老师交谈也非常开心,整体很愉快。 ✅本条车评一品楼已通过: @XA_YPL
【群组】:西安品茗茶园春色 【时间】:2026-09-22 【老师】:景瑟 【留名】:匿名 【颜值身材】:9 【接待态度】:9.2 【服务技能】:9.5 【综合评分】:9.23【过程】:写个景瑟的出击作业,看老师反馈很好,之前就想一睹芳容,可有事未成行,这次如愿以偿?进门 老师笑脸相迎,递水问候,聊天很亲切。洗澡环节全自动,体验完美。课表上的 服务很到位,床感很好,换了几个姿势,在老师的一阵娇喘声中,最后顺利出货,总之非常好的一次体验,已加入回床名单!
“ 不用很厉害,舒服就已经超棒啦✨ 在线开课
【时间】:2026-09-21 【群组】:西安都市日报 【老师】:景瑟 【留名】:匿名 【整体】:9 【过程】:屋内环境不错,很干净,帮我洗澡,洗的很舒服特刺激,到了床上又换了御姐风的造型,后背做了一遍服务,胸软丝滑,香头软软的爽死了,前面从胸开始舔,像女友,一只手摸我,整个人都起飞了,舌头特别丝滑,几下弄得就受不了,戴上t直捣黄龙,小穴很润,几分钟就被老师征服了。
中医说:“心情愉悦是大补,情绪低落是大伤。凡是能让你快乐的,就是你的药。” 在线 开课
❤1
【评价等级】: 👍 好评 【日 期】: 2026-09-20 【验 证 人】: 传说 【美女昵称】: 景瑟 【地 区】: 天朗·蓝湖树 【人照得分】: 9 【颜值得分】: 9 【身材得分】:9 【服务得分】: 9 【态度得分】: 10 【环境得分】: 9 【综合得分】: 9.17 【年 龄】: 25 【凶 器】: C 【服务过程】: 进门就很亲切,神情自然,对学生的友好完全不似作伪,开局就让人非常舒服。服务有胸推漫游,吃服务的兄弟应该喜欢这个,而且老师的服务和态度很好,第一次见面也没有拘束和陌生感,相处时非常舒服,如春风拂面,百花盛开。 西安怡红院
在线呀 开课
【时间】:2026-09-19 【老师】:景瑟 【留名】:匿名 【人照】:9 【颜值】:8.5 【身材】:9 【服务】:9.3 【态度】:9 【环境】:9 【综合】:8.97 【过程】:在一次探寻美丽的小姐姐了,给姐姐交个反馈。姐姐的身材火辣,咪咪挺大的,还有这张非常韵味的脸,映入我眼帘,瞬间勾起了我浮动的心,迫不及待的洗完澡进入主题。服务内容很顶,课表内容都做的很到位,🐻贴着巨真实,那种半漏不漏的涩感简直了,奶浪视而可见,性格温柔,口的特别润,做爱过程反馈感很强,嗯嗯哼哼的,这真是特别满足了,完美对象,很优质靠谱值得冲,没力气做第二战了,可恶,下次一定早点来。 ✅西北一家亲✅认证车评
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @jingse6688. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“秘密㊙️小天地” (@jingse6688), 1,836 subscribers as measured 7 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/jingse6688.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.