Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 990913 연준 𐙚 NO LABELS PT. 02

Channel

990913 연준 𐙚 NO LABELS PT. 02

@jjunahh

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

2,072subscribers

+37 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002179893548
TypeChannel
Username@jjunahh
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live5 September 2026
Measurements held9
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 5 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/jjunahh

Growth

2,0332,0732,0536 August 2026 — 2,035 subscribers7 August 2026 — 2,033 subscribers9 August 2026 — 2,038 subscribers13 August 2026 — 2,060 subscribers19 August 2026 — 2,061 subscribers22 August 2026 — 2,065 subscribers25 August 2026 — 2,073 subscribers1 September 2026 — 2,071 subscribers5 September 2026 — 2,072 subscribers2,0726 August 20265 September 2026
9 measurements spanning 30 days, net +37. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,027–2,079 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
5 Sept 2026, 08:172,072+1
1 Sept 2026, 07:272,071-2
25 Aug 2026, 21:222,073+8
22 Aug 2026, 11:582,065+4
19 Aug 2026, 10:032,061+1
13 Aug 2026, 00:452,060+22
9 Aug 2026, 16:232,038+5
7 Aug 2026, 03:002,033-2
6 Aug 2026, 16:062,035first reading

Engagement

10 posts held, back to 6 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 10 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
10m 10s
Average length
3m 23s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

842 reactions across 10 posts, in 17 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 27.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 526937284863539878622927.2%
custom 539093293864688789214717.5%
custom 537279921735598743012114.4%
11313.4%
🥰9811.6%
🍓586.89%
🔥242.85%
💋202.38%
💘161.90%
🍾30.356%
💔30.356%
🙈30.356%
🐳20.238%
😇20.238%
🎄10.119%
🏆10.119%
🦄10.119%

Custom emoji. 3 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 842 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 15:19 UTC166 views52 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🖤🌟🤩 us promo HIII ><

🥰24custom 526937284863539878611custom 53909329386468878929custom 537279921735598743051🍓1💋1

7 Aug 2026, 07:44 UTC259 views95 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🤍🤩🌱 он идеальный, с какого угла ни посмотреть 🤍

🍓40custom 526937284863539878621custom 5372799217355987430196custom 53909329386468878924💘2💋1🥰1

7 Aug 2026, 07:42 UTC254 views83 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

🪦👗🚬 legendary ggum is here </3

custom 539093293864688789236custom 526937284863539878619custom 537279921735598743017🔥4🍾21🏆1💋1

Signed ‘л!!𝜗ৎ

7 Aug 2026, 07:41 UTC227 views73 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

🌟🌟🤩 no more disco YESSS ❕❕

🥰31💘12💋11custom 52693728486353987867custom 53727992173559874303🔥2🙈2custom 53909329386468878922

Signed ‘л!!𝜗ৎ

7 Aug 2026, 07:37 UTC221 views87 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

💓🎵❗️ fxxking star LETS GOOO 💥💥

custom 52693728486353987864415custom 539093293864688789215custom 53727992173559874304💋2💘2🔥2🍓1

6 Aug 2026, 20:41 UTC296 views108 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🤩🖤😩 omg. hi. uhm hell—

50custom 537279921735598743023🔥16custom 52693728486353987869custom 53909329386468878924🥰3🍓2💋1

6 Aug 2026, 20:39 UTC301 views98 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🌟🤩🎬 ёнджун сегодня выступает на summer bash 26 >< и моа уже слышат, как он репетирует! ( включали no more disco и fxxking star )

custom 52693728486353987865018🥰17custom 53909329386468878927custom 53727992173559874303🍓2💋1

6 Aug 2026, 15:10 UTC310 views119 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🔜🌟🫒 this VIBE > > > 💥💥

custom 539093293864688789250custom 537279921735598743023🥰16custom 52693728486353987869🍓86🐳2😇2

6 Aug 2026, 15:08 UTC128 views48 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

🥚🤩😩 HI YAWNZZN ><

custom 52693728486353987862112custom 53727992173559874308custom 53909329386468878924🍓2🥰1

6 Aug 2026, 12:02 UTC208 views79 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

🖤❤️‍🩹📖 handsome EVEN on getty images 🤍

custom 526937284863539878638custom 537279921735598743016custom 5390932938646887892163🥰3🍓2💋1

Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @jjunahh. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 27 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

♾ᴛᴏᴍᴏʀʀᴏᴡ_x_ᴛᴏɢᴇᴛʜᴇʀ♾
@Together_X_Tomorrow · 36,804
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 1 September 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“990913 연준 𐙚 NO LABELS PT. 02” (@jjunahh), 2,072 subscribers as measured 5 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/jjunahh.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.