⚡ Появился один новый существенный блок по нефтяному сектору ВЭФ-2026. Вице-премьер Александр Новак заявил 2 сентября, что российские нефтекомпании сейчас стремятся максимально нарастить добычу в рамках доступных условий. При действующей квоте ОПЕК+ для России 9,949 млн барр./сутки июльская оценка фактической добычи составляла лишь около 8,9 млн барр./сутки, то есть сохраняется значительный технический потенциал для…

Channel
ФИНАНСИСТКА
@jkinvesticii
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
14,323subscribers
-7 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001658740922 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @jkinvesticii |
| Created | 25 January 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 30 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/jkinvesticii |
Topic
National news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 68% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Sept 2026, 20:38 | 14,323 | -4 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 19:39 | 14,327 | -6 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 02:01 | 14,333 | -7 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 07:40 | 14,340 | -1 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 01:18 | 14,341 | +3 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 16:17 | 14,338 | -10 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 16:35 | 14,348 | +1 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 17:17 | 14,347 | -3 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 19:04 | 14,350 | +5 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 20:34 | 14,345 | +2 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 21:34 | 14,343 | +1 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 01:08 | 14,342 | +15 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 04:42 | 14,327 | +1 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 02:32 | 14,326 | -3 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 03:02 | 14,329 | -5 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 04:16 | 14,334 | +1 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 03:48 | 14,333 | -2 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 22:24 | 14,335 | +5 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 22:35 | 14,330 | +16 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 21:58 | 14,314 | first reading |
Engagement
70 posts held, back to 2 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 51 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 2.54%
- avg views ÷ 14,323 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 364
- 16 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 1.65%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 16
- of 70 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 15 of 16 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 70 (2 August 2026 – 2 September 2026) |
| Views total | 5,817 |
| Reactions total | 93 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 2 Sept 2026, 18:38 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 2m 41s
- Average length
- 32s
Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
357 reactions across 57 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 63.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 226 | 63.3% | |
| 👍 | 111 | 31.1% | |
| 👏 | 20 | 5.60% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 57 of the 70 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 357 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 70 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Обсудим итоги первого дня ВЭФ-2026 — 1 сентября именно через призму инвестора. 1. ⚡ Дальний Восток входит в большой энергетический цикл Это, на мой взгляд, главная инвестиционная новость первого дня. Планируется строительство 6 ГЭС общей мощностью 3,77 ГВт, двух АЭС на 3,2 ГВт, а также тысяч километров новых электросетей. Уже до 2030 года предполагается ввод 8,3 ГВт тепловой генерации. Среди потенциальных инвесторо…
🔥4
Самое важное событие первого дня ВЭФ — не отдельный контракт. Начинает проявляться единая конструкция нового инвестиционного цикла: энергетика → инфраструктура → Арктика и СМП → Китай → специальные налоговые режимы → новые финансовые инструменты. Именно поэтому я бы сейчас особенно внимательно следила за HYDR, SBER, энергетическим и транспортным сектором, компаниями с крупными проектами на Дальнем Востоке и в Арктик…
👍3
Posted without readable text
🔥5👍1
Во Владивостоке открылся ВЭФ-2026. И инвесторам точно стоит за ним следить. Сегодня стартовал Восточный экономический форум — одна из главных площадок, где государство, крупнейшие компании и инвесторы обсуждают, куда будет двигаться экономика Дальнего Востока и какие проекты получат деньги в ближайшие годы. И я смотрю на ВЭФ не столько с политической точки зрения, сколько с инвестиционной. Потому что именно на таки…
👍10
Video, posted without a caption
🔥7
Posted without readable text
🔥8
ЦБ показал четыре сценария российской экономики до 2029 года. И для инвестора здесь есть очень важный сигнал. Сегодня Банк России опубликовал проект денежно-кредитной политики на 2027–2029 годы. Главный вывод: ставки в России могут оставаться высокими значительно дольше, чем рынок ожидал еще несколько месяцев назад. В базовом сценарии средняя ключевая ставка в 2027 году составит 10,5–12,5%, в 2028-м — 8–9%, и только…
🔥7
С 1 сентября в России появляется универсальный QR-код. Что это значит? С 1 сентября 2026 года начинается новый этап перестройки платежной системы. Вместо множества QR-кодов разных банков внедряется универсальный платежный QR-код, оператором которого выступает НСПК. Покупатель сканирует один код, а затем выбирает доступный способ оплаты. Важно: универсальный QR и цифровой рубль — не одно и то же. QR-код — это единая…
🔥1
Video message, posted without a caption
👏5
Posted without readable text
🔥8
ИНВЕСТИЦИОННЫЙ КЛУБ В СЕНТЯБРЕ ОБНОВЛЯЕТСЯ 🚀 Дорогие участники клуба и выпускники онлайн-университета «Финансология»! Открываем доступ в Инвестиционный клуб на сентябрь. В новом сезоне я решила сделать клуб ещё более практическим: больше работы с реальным рынком, больше торговых разборов и отдельное направление по разработке стратегий. С сентября Ксения больше не работает в команде «Финансологии» и не принимает учас…
🔥3
Showing the 12 most recent of 70 posts we hold for @jkinvesticii. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The 3 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Вы чувствуете себя более обеспеченным?
- Да8%
- Нет28%
- Остался на том же уровне32%
- Стал беднее33%
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Ваша ЗП выросла?
- Да27%
- Нет73%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Что думаете?
- Да50%
- Нет52%
The shares total 102%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 70 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 2 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ФИНАНСИСТКА” (@jkinvesticii), 14,323 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/jkinvesticii.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.