Job listings — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Observations
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Content that also appears on other registered channels
Posts published here appear word for word on 3 other registered channels. They sit inside a group of 8 channels that share the same post bodies with each other. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.
Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.
What this cannot establish
MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.
Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 12 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.
“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 20 comparable posts for this entry, running 26 July 2026 to 7 August 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.
The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.
Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).
Across the whole group of 8, the earliest publisher we hold is @it_vac. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.
Views per post sit far below this size band
66.4 average views per post against 46,024 subscribers — an engagement rate of 0.144%. Across the 8,382 registered channels in the same cohort — 31,624–99,993 subscribers, posting mainly in Russian — the middle half sit between 5.04% and 21.0%, with a median of 10.6%.
What this was computed from
Window
30 days (28 August 2026 – 27 September 2026)
Posts measured
123 of 123 published in the window (123 exact, 0 rounded by Telegram)
Views totalled
8,173
Mature posts only
0.148% over 118 posts read at least 24h after publication
When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or below the 1st percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — below it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.
This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal. A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.
Recorded under the keys clone_copy · clone_source · err_low, last confirmed 27 September 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
Also posting the same content
This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 7 other registered channels, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
34 measurements spanning 49 days, net -1,661. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 45,775–47,934 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 34
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
25 Sept 2026, 02:39
46,024
-253
17 Sept 2026, 03:36
46,277
-67
15 Sept 2026, 01:59
46,344
-50
13 Sept 2026, 10:18
46,394
-62
11 Sept 2026, 14:58
46,456
-94
8 Sept 2026, 21:38
46,550
-163
5 Sept 2026, 12:42
46,713
-78
3 Sept 2026, 12:59
46,791
-39
2 Sept 2026, 06:03
46,830
-39
1 Sept 2026, 05:25
46,869
-37
31 Aug 2026, 03:55
46,906
-56
30 Aug 2026, 01:05
46,962
-27
29 Aug 2026, 03:44
46,989
-21
28 Aug 2026, 05:28
47,010
-23
27 Aug 2026, 07:56
47,033
-38
26 Aug 2026, 05:47
47,071
-31
25 Aug 2026, 03:43
47,102
-44
23 Aug 2026, 22:48
47,146
-47
22 Aug 2026, 04:27
47,193
-39
20 Aug 2026, 22:27
47,232
first reading
Engagement
242 posts held, back to 26 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 113 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
0.144%
avg views ÷ 46,024 subscribers
Avg views / post
66.4
122 posts measured
Reaction rate
—
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
122
of 242 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 27 September 2026
Posts held
242 (26 July 2026 – 27 September 2026)
Views total
8,096
Reactions total
—
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
27 Sept 2026, 09:18 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈2,530
Videos
≈5
Links
≈2,160
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 27 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
📲 Работа, которую можно встроить даже в загруженный график
Не обязательно менять привычный образ жизни, чтобы начать удалённую занятость. Здесь можно самостоятельно распределять рабочее время.
💸 Доход от 68 000 ₽ +
Вакансия подойдёт, если вы:
✔️ хотите работать из дома
✔️ ищете гибкий график
✔️ хотите освоить новое направление
✔️ пока не имеете опыта
📌 Основные задачи:
— принимать и обрабатывать заявки;
— проверять…
💰 ЗАРАБАТЫВАЙ ОТ 90 000 ₽ В МЕСЯЦ ОНЛАЙН
Идеальная подработка для всех. Работа с графиками и данными.
УСЛОВИЯ:
🔹Платим от 4 000 ₽ уже в первый день
🔹нужно уделять 1-3 часа в день
🔹даем пройти наше обучение
Выбираем людей после ответа на 5 вопросов в онлайн тесте 👇
Отвечать на отзывы на маркетплейсе Ozon/WB ✔️
📋 Задача:
— Предоставим аккаунт
— Отвечать на отзывы товаров по шаблону
— Работа простая, всё покажем
Занятость: 2–3 часа в день
💰Оплата: от 4 500 ₽ в день (зависит от скорости)
👤 Требования:
— Возраст от 18 лет
— Только для жителей РФ
— Опыт не требуется
Формат: удалённо, из дома
📩 Контакты для связи: @yulia_wbozon
📋 Помощник по данным
🔥 От 68 000 ₽
✔️ Из дома
✔️ Гибкий график
✔️ Простые задачи
✔️ Обучение
✔️ Без опыта
Что нужно:
• проверять данные
• заполнять таблицы
• находить ошибки
• выполнять задания по инструкции
📩 По вопросам: @mashaap55
🛒 Помощник по заказам
✔️ Доход от 65 000 ₽
✔️ Работа удалённо
✔️ Гибкий график
✔️ Обучение
✔️ Без опыта
📌 Что делать:
• обрабатывать заказы
• проверять информацию
• отвечать на простые вопросы
• работать по инструкции
📩 @aleksandrasmilee
Нужны модераторы роликов в 🎥
Задача:
— Смотреть короткие видео в TikTok и отмечать те, что нарушают правила.
Условия:
— Без опыта;
— Работа с телефона или ПК;
— Подойдёт даже подросткам.
Оплата: от 3200 руб. в день.
🔺Откликнуться
➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖
Ищем людей для модерации каналов 💬
Задача:
— Удалять спам, отмечать подозрительные сообщения, ставить реакции.
Условия:
— 1–2 часа в день;
— Подойдёт без опыта;
— Главное …
Помощник интернет-магазина
✔️ Доход от 75 000 ₽
✔️ Работа полностью удалённо
✔️ Удобный график
✔️ Обучение перед стартом
✔️ Понятные задачи
✔️ Можно без опыта
📌 Ваша работа:
• обновлять информацию о товарах
• проверять карточки
• работать с готовыми таблицами
• следить за актуальностью данных
🏠 Работать можно из дома — нужен только телефон или компьютер.
📩 Для подробностей: @saschahr
Таргетолог
Продвижение социальных сетей
✏️ Писать: ссылка
➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖
Программист
Сделать сайт. Php, wordpress, css, html
✏️ Подать заявку
➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖
Дизайнер
Для разработки коллекции. Преимуществом будет опыт работы с созданием одежды для покрытых мусульманок (но не обязательное условие)
✏️ Подать заявку
➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖
📕 Разместить вакансию
📕 Каталог вакансий
📕 Ссылка для друга
📚 Работа мечты
Оператор онлайн-сервиса
✔️ Доход от 68 000 ₽
✔️ Удалённый формат
✔️ Свободный график
✔️ Обучение за счёт проекта
✔️ Работа без офиса
✔️ Опыт не требуется
📌 Основные задачи:
• обрабатывать информацию
• проверять обращения
• работать в личном кабинете
• выполнять небольшие поручения по инструкции
💻 Подойдёт тем, кто хочет спокойную работу и возможность совмещать её с другими делами.
📩 Для связи: @a_lis_hr
Ассистент отдела закупок
✔️ Доход от 75 000 ₽
✔️ Удалённый формат
✔️ Гибкий график
✔️ Обучение с нуля
✔️ Понятные задачи
✔️ Без опыта
📌 Что нужно делать:
• работать с заявками
• проверять информацию о товарах
• заполнять простые таблицы
• помогать по текущим задачам отдела
📩 Для связи: @vika_HR_msk
Showing the 12 most recent of 242 posts we hold for @jobi_jobs. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
6
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
6
vacant every time we have ever looked
@jobi_jobs named 6 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@howr_hrmng named in 7 posts, 8 August 2026 – 18 August 2026
@smilegodlbovesyou named in 5 posts, 8 August 2026 – 18 August 2026
@anna_sergeevna_77 named in 4 posts, 8 August 2026 – 12 August 2026
@zlatta_managerwb named in 2 posts, 8 August 2026 – 9 August 2026
@evgeniya_wbozon named in 1 post, 9 August 2026 – 9 August 2026
@evgeniya_managerhr named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 26 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
VIP удалёнка @mark_tod · 24,263 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 44 here — alongside 43 others — read 16 September 2026
Удалёнка | Фриланс @jobs_start · 132,962 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 13 August 2026
Удалёнка без опыта - Фриланс @m_marketd · 125,161 Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 57 here — alongside 56 others — read 13 August 2026
Avtozvuk - Музыка в машину🔊🔊🔊😜 @avtozvukBASS50 · 64,389 Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 44 here — alongside 43 others — read 26 August 2026
МУВИС | Фильмы и сериалы @kinofilmy_seriali · 109,024 Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 51 here — alongside 50 others — read 24 August 2026
This channel appears in 5 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Фриланс | Удалённая работа” (@jobi_jobs), 46,024 subscribers as measured 25 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/jobi_jobs.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.