Gambling & betting — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
33 measurements spanning 43 days, net +1,060. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 16,602–17,980 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 33
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
19 Sept 2026, 03:01
17,821
+102
16 Sept 2026, 19:40
17,719
+66
14 Sept 2026, 19:57
17,653
+56
13 Sept 2026, 09:40
17,597
+16
11 Sept 2026, 14:37
17,581
+55
8 Sept 2026, 20:39
17,526
+65
5 Sept 2026, 13:16
17,461
+18
3 Sept 2026, 11:57
17,443
+19
2 Sept 2026, 05:34
17,424
+21
1 Sept 2026, 05:48
17,403
-16
31 Aug 2026, 08:03
17,419
+20
30 Aug 2026, 04:23
17,399
+34
29 Aug 2026, 06:44
17,365
+18
28 Aug 2026, 09:17
17,347
+29
27 Aug 2026, 05:54
17,318
+65
26 Aug 2026, 03:36
17,253
+13
25 Aug 2026, 04:25
17,240
+40
23 Aug 2026, 21:37
17,200
+33
22 Aug 2026, 02:26
17,167
+31
20 Aug 2026, 20:12
17,136
first reading
Engagement
67 posts held, back to 27 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 53 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
15.0%
avg views ÷ 17,821 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,670
20 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.94%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
20
of 67 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026
Posts held
67 (27 July 2026 – 2 September 2026)
Views total
53,330
Reactions total
1,037
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
3 Sept 2026, 09:18 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
2m 22s
Average length
7s
Measured directly from 20 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
4,363 reactions across 66 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 42.5% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
custom 5465581574785376524
1,853
42.5%
custom 5465519585522390923
747
17.1%
custom 5465546373233417433
580
13.3%
❤
438
10.0%
custom 5465553039022660471
223
5.11%
custom 5465424267313193126
165
3.78%
custom 5447144474184562737
154
3.53%
🤩
90
2.06%
custom 5258274958085205037
69
1.58%
🎉
22
0.504%
😁
15
0.344%
👌
5
0.115%
😎
2
0.046%
Custom emoji. 7 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 66 of the 67 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4,363 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 67 most recent posts we hold, published 27 July 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
4
across the posts below
Posts paid on
4
of 67 we hold a reading for · 6%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @johnbit_crypto. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 67 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 27 July 2026 to 2 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
💎 ВИГРАВ ВІД 1000 ГРН? ЦЕЙ ВИГРАШ МОЖЕ ПРИНЕСТИ ЩЕ 50 FS БЕЗ ВЕЙДЖЕРА!
Цього разу Джон не покладається на рандом 🤠 приз отримають перші 1️⃣👌 учасників, які виконають усі умови!💰
🔹 Мати реальний виграш у слотах від 1000 грн у John Bit за період 1–8 вересня
🔹 Скинути в коментарі скрін виграшу + номер акаунта
🔹 Мати активний акаунт John Bit
⚠️ FS отримають саме перші 10 учасників із підтвердженим реальним виграшем, я…
🇺🇦 МАРТА КОСТЮК ПРОДОВЖУЄ БОРОТЬБУ НА US OPEN! 👍
💪Сьогодні у другому колі US Open Марта Костюк зустрінеться з американкою Слоан Стівенс — чемпіонкою цього турніру 2017 року.
🤠 А Джон додає ще більше інтересу до матчу — розігруємо 10 фрібетів!
Для участі:
✍️ зроби будь-яку ставку на матч Костюк 🆚 Стівенс;
✍️ напиши в коментарях номер ставки + номер акаунта;
✍️ май активний акаунт — гра або ставки щонайменше за остан…
☔ ОСІНЬ ПРИЙШЛА — АЛЕ СУМУВАТИ ДЖОН НЕ ДАСТЬ! ЗАБИРАЙ FB! 🤠
Починаємо осінь правильно — розігруємо 20 ФРІБЕТІВ за ставки на спорт!💰
Обирай будь-яку подію заряджай свій прогноз та залітай у розіграш 👇
📎 Умови:
🔹 Зробити ставку від 200 грн з коефіцієнтом від 1.5
🔹 Написати в коментарях номер ставки + номер акаунта
🔹 Мати активний акаунт John Bit
🤑 8 вересня Джон обере 20 переможців та роздасть FB!
Осінь…
👀 ВПІЗНАЄШ ФУТБОЛІСТА ЛИШЕ ЗА ТАТУ?
Джон трохи ускладнив задачу: обличчя сховав, форму затемнив — залишив тільки одну дуже впізнавану підказку ✍️
🎁 10 ФРІБЕТІВ заберуть 10 найшвидших, хто правильно вгадає футболіста на банері!
📎 Напиши в коментарях ім’я футболіста
📎 Додай номер свого акаунта John Bit
📎 Важливо: акаунт має бути активним (останні 14 днів)
👍 Тут вирішує не тільки футбольна інтуїція, а й швидкість — …
🔐 НОВИЙ ВИКЛИК! ЗЛАМАЙ СЕЙФ ДЖОНА ЗНОВУ — ЗАБИРАЙ 50 FS! 🔐
Як думаєш, зможеш вгадати комбінацію? 😏
🎁 Розігруємо 3️⃣✨ переможних місць по 50 FS!
👏 ЩО ПОТРІБНО ЗРОБИТИ:
🟢 Напиши в коментарях свій варіант тризначного коду від сейфа + номер акаунта
🟢 Залиш лише одну спробу (необхідно мати активність на акаунті щонайменше за останні 14 днів.)
Переможцями стануть:
➡ Ті, хто вгадає код повністю
➡ А якщо ніхто не ві…
👏 СЕРІЯ А ПОВЕРТАЄТЬСЯ ДО НЕАПОЛЯ!
Сьогодні на «Дієго Армандо Марадона» — Наполі 🆚 Комо. Це матч 2-го туру Серії А та перша домашня гра неаполітанців у сезоні 2026/27.
✍️Старт о 18:30.
Для «Наполі» це можливість гучно відкрити домашній сезон, але «Комо» точно їде до Неаполя не просто подивитися на стадіон. Тож чекаємо на гарячі 90 хвилин і хороший привід перевірити свій прогноз. 💪
🤠 Джон уже зарядив лінію на матч …
🔎 СКІЛЬКИ ВІДМІННОСТЕЙ ЗНАЙДЕШ ТИ? ЗАБИРАЙ FS! 🏆
Джон підготував нову перевірку на уважність 🤠
Перед тобою два майже однакові банери 🎣 Але «майже» — ключове слово 💪
🤩 РОЗІГРУЄМО 2️⃣❤️ ПЕРЕМОЖНИХ МІСЦЬ ПО 50 FS!
🔹 Уважно порівняй дві картинки
🔹 Знайди якомога більше відмінностей та май активний акаунт.
🔹 Опиши в коментарях всі знайдені відмінності + номер акаунта
👍 Чим уважніше придивишся — тим більше шансів вилов…
👏 ЦЕНТРАЛЬНИЙ МАТЧ ТУРУ В УПЛ — «ШАХТАР» 🆚 «ПОЛІССЯ»!
На «Арені Львів» зустрінуться Шахтар та Полісся — один із найцікавіших матчів 4-го туру УПЛ.💪
«Гірники» розпочали чемпіонат максимально впевнено — 3 матчі, 3 перемоги та 9 очок. 👍У минулому турі команда Арди Турана мінімально здолала «Харків» 1:0 та продовжила ділити лідерство в чемпіонаті.
«Полісся» теж потужно стартувало з двох перемог поспіль, але в останньом…
💎 П’ЯТНИЧНИЙ ВЕЧІР ПРЕМ’ЄР-ЛІГИ — ПЕРЕВІРЯЄМО ФУТБОЛЬНУ ІНТУЇЦІЮ!
Крістал Пелас 🆚 Манчестер Сіті — уже завтра команди зустрінуться на «Селгерст Парк» у 2-му турі АПЛ. 👏«Сіті» стартував у чемпіонаті з перемоги, а «Пелас» після поразки в першому турі спробує взяти перші очки сезону.
А Джон додає до матчу ще трохи азарту 🤠
💰 Розігруємо 10 фрібетів!
🔹 вгадай точний рахунок матчу в основний час;
🔹 напиши прогноз та ном…
💎 ШВИДКА ВІКТОРИНА ВІД ДЖОНА — ЛОВИ БОНУС ПЕРШИМ!💪
🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥
Сьогодні перевіримо, хто тут справжній знавець Ліги чемпіонів ✊
Протягом кількох годин Джон залишатиме в коментарях запитання про клуби, гравців, рекорди та легендарні матчі ЛЧ 💜
💰 У грі — 30 БОНУСІВ (на вибір бездепні 50 FS або FB 200 грн)!
Правила максимально прості:
🔹 стеж за новими запитаннями в коментарях
🔹 пиши правильну відповідь + номер акаунта JohnBit…
Showing the 12 most recent of 67 posts we hold for @johnbit_crypto. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@johnbit_crypto edited 3 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
11 August 2026
Most recent edit
25 August 2026
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“JohnBit” (@johnbit_crypto), 17,821 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/johnbit_crypto.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.