Photo, posted without a caption

Channel
메리츠 김준성, Mobility War
@joonsungkim
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
11,705subscribers
-45 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001123887362 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @joonsungkim |
| Created | 9 October 2017 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 1 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 24 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 1 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/joonsungkim |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1 Sept 2026, 18:34 | 11,705 | -4 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 15:38 | 11,709 | +1 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 17:33 | 11,708 | +3 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 14:53 | 11,705 | -2 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 14:56 | 11,707 | +1 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 14:43 | 11,706 | +2 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 17:55 | 11,704 | +6 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 18:23 | 11,698 | -3 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 15:57 | 11,701 | -5 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 12:38 | 11,706 | -6 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 09:11 | 11,712 | +2 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 09:52 | 11,710 | -10 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 11:59 | 11,720 | -3 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 13:04 | 11,723 | +1 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 16:39 | 11,722 | -8 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 06:04 | 11,730 | -2 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 09:13 | 11,732 | -6 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 07:41 | 11,738 | -3 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 04:28 | 11,741 | -2 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 03:52 | 11,743 | first reading |
Engagement
48 posts held, back to 28 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 44 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 16.3%
- avg views ÷ 11,705 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 1,910
- 35 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 35
- of 48 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 1 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 48 (28 July 2026 – 1 September 2026) |
| Views total | 66,682 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 1 Sept 2026, 17:36 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Recent posts
Photo, posted without a caption
📮[메리츠증권 모빌리티 김준성] 안녕하세요 메리츠증권 김준성입니다. 현대차/기아 8월 글로벌 도매판매 업데이트 드리겠습니다.
📮[메리츠증권 모빌리티 김준성] MOBILITY at a glance 2026.8.28 (금) 안녕하세요 메리츠증권 김준성입니다. 데일리 업데이트 드리겠습니다. (Daily: https://han.gl/ndV2F) ▶ 유니트리 주가 급락…휴머노이드 병목은 'AI 두뇌' (전자신문) https://han.gl/IYdj3 - Unitree 주가 급락을 계기로 휴머노이드 로봇의 기술적 한계가 부각되는 중. 업계 관계자들은 다음 경쟁이 하드웨어보다 AI 모델과 데이터 확보 역량에 달려 있으며, 고품질 데이터와 컴퓨팅 자원, 시뮬레이션·강화학습 기술의 고도화가 필요하다고 진단 ▶ 휴머노이드 2.3조·피지컬AI 2.8조 투입…2030년 10대 업종 특화로봇 (헤럴드경제) https://han.gl/WMMP4 - 정부가 휴머노이드 생태계 구축에 …
📮[메리츠증권 모빌리티 김준성] 안녕하세요 메리츠증권 김준성입니다. 현대차 업데이트 드리겠습니다. (URL: https://han.gl/2Xvvc) ▶ 2026년 CEO Investor Day (CID) Key Takeaways, 아쉬움이 남는 세부사항 공유 - 현대차, CID를 통해 세 가지 비전 제시. 각 비전의 세부사항과 비전 설정의 전제가 되는 시장 환경 인식에 대해 아쉬움 존재 ▶ #1. 2030년 판매 목표, 550만대 - 현대차 전세계 도매판매, 2023년 연간 422만대, 2024년 연간 414만대, 2025년 연간 414만대, 2026년 상반기 197만대. 하향 정체 추세 뚜렷. 2030년 550만대 판매 목표 제시는 판매 성과의 흐름을 바꿔 나가겠다는 의지를 드러냈다는 점에서 고무적 - 그러나 방법론에 대한 설명…
📮[메리츠증권 모빌리티 김준성] MOBILITY at a glance 2026.8.27 (목) 안녕하세요 메리츠증권 김준성입니다. 데일리 업데이트 드리겠습니다. (Daily: https://han.gl/BfiZn) ▶ 현대차 "보스턴다이나믹스 IPO 계획 아직…가장 좋은 결정할 것" (더팩트) https://han.gl/eqcvF - 현대차는 26일 2026 CEO 인베스터 데이를 진행. 질의응답 시간에 Boston Dynamics의 IPO 여부에 대해 아직 결정된 바가 없다고 밝혔으며, BD를 비롯한 현대차그룹에 가장 도움이 되는 방향으로 중장기 전략을 구성한다는 계획 ▶ 현대차 "2028년 첫 SDV 양산차에 레벨2+ 자율주행…엔비디아와 협업" (뉴스1) https://han.gl/hrmvI - 박민우 현대차그룹 AVP본부장은 26…
Photo, posted without a caption
Photo, posted without a caption
Photo, posted without a caption
Photo, posted without a caption
Photo, posted without a caption
File, posted without a caption
Showing the 12 most recent of 48 posts we hold for @joonsungkim. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 347,976 of 1,629,535 entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 1 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“메리츠 김준성, Mobility War” (@joonsungkim), 11,705 subscribers as measured 1 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/joonsungkim.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.