Channel
@jouissense
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
157subscribers
+28 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001402796234 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @jouissense |
| Created | Between 1 October 2018 and 30 November 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 8 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/jouissense |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Sept 2026, 12:58 | 157 | -1 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 02:57 | 158 | +2 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 18:48 | 156 | +2 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 22:18 | 154 | +2 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 11:47 | 152 | +7 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 21:01 | 145 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 00:53 | 145 | +16 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 05:35 | 129 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 27 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
47 reactions across 16 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 51.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 😁 | 24 | 51.1% | |
| ❤ | 9 | 19.1% | |
| 🔥 | 8 | 17.0% | |
| custom 5978914506930130549 | 3 | 6.38% | |
| ⚡ | 1 | 2.13% | |
| 😭 | 1 | 2.13% | |
| 🤔 | 1 | 2.13% |
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 47 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 27 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Честно говоря, always has been. Хороший текст это редкость, вне зависимости от авторства. Просто ошибки человека - человеческие, а ошибки ИИ - искусственные. Ведь чтобы написать хороший текст мало прочитать 100 хороших книг, надо НЕ прочитать 1000 средних книг и прочитать 10 ужасных. Good story is always a seller's market.© Предлагаю мысленный эксперимент: обратный тест Тюринга. Суть в чем, можете ли вы представить, …
❤2🤔1
Хорошая дискуссия на тему выхода из состава США. Оксфорд пока не верит в такой вариант (но очень хотелось бы: отгрызть от США Калифорнию это как от России... думайте) https://youtu.be/ZmGfSa2gfXQ?si=K-7vPRNZe0blIQX-
😁2
А вот и ответочка от вне системной молодняка. Говорит, "слопулизм". Жду, когда через 5 лет слово "слоп" пройдет свой путь от ругательства до комплимента. Типо да, был вот нейрослоп, а сейчас что, интернет по паспорту. https://youtu.be/IPldK6B5Okc?si=C3y48Agm4GohY9ug
❤1😁1
Плаза наносит ответный удар
Еврокомиссия признала, что не смогла найти связь РФ с миграционным кризисом в Сеуте. Об этом заявил ее представитель Гийом Мерсье.
custom 59789145069301305493
Такер выложил свои 10 заповедей августовские тезисы для новой партии. Вот тут я говорил, что он пойдет на выборы в 2028 году, произойдет это скорее всего в формате контролируемой оппозиции: Такер поддержит какого-нибудь "нового человека", они с JD придут к нему на подкаст, "я согласен с товарищем Сталиным в общем и в частном", а потом "новый человек" получит номинацию на пост вице-президента, сольет свой медийный кап…
❤1
Герменевтика Джокера
❤1
Пов вы подошли к админу Топ оф Марк
😁10
Да ладно
😁6
Photo, posted without a caption
🔥2⚡1
Один из пробелов в знаниях, который доставляет мне сожаление это этнометодология. Что существует с точки зрения микросоциологии в жизни мужчины? Я постулирую, что это две вещи: женщина и машина. В обществе маркетплейсной агоры машина заменила мужчине общество. В условиях бюрократической легитимности, машина заменила и коллектив. Я бы с удовольствием прочитал поминутное расписание японского 40 летнего офисного клерка.…
Вы только посмотрите на это лицо. Взгляд человека, который хакнул будущее. Леопольд Ашенбреннер, мальчик 2001 года рождения. В июне 2024-го, вскоре после ухода из OpenAI, он опубликовал 165-страничное эссе Situational Awareness о том, как искусственный интеллект в ближайшие годы перевернет экономику, институты и геополитику. Текст стал обязательным чтением в Кремниевой долине, а самого Ашенбреннера начали называть …
😭1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @jouissense. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Top of Mark” (@jouissense), 157 subscribers as measured 14 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/jouissense.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.