Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for СБГ | Журнал (Зенит, новости, слухи)

Channel

СБГ | Журнал (Зенит, новости, слухи)

@journalsbg

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

2,552subscribers

-234 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001161186709
TypeChannel
Username@journalsbg
Created12 September 2020measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held15
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/journalsbg

Topic

Sports — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 15 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

2,5522,7862,6697 August 2026 — 2,786 subscribers7 August 2026 — 2,786 subscribers7 August 2026 — 2,785 subscribers10 August 2026 — 2,778 subscribers13 August 2026 — 2,773 subscribers16 August 2026 — 2,745 subscribers19 August 2026 — 2,741 subscribers22 August 2026 — 2,714 subscribers26 August 2026 — 2,679 subscribers29 August 2026 — 2,656 subscribers1 September 2026 — 2,637 subscribers5 September 2026 — 2,651 subscribers10 September 2026 — 2,618 subscribers13 September 2026 — 2,590 subscribers18 September 2026 — 2,552 subscribers7 August 202618 September 2026
15 measurements spanning 42 days, net -234. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,517–2,821 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Sept 2026, 04:192,552-38
13 Sept 2026, 17:162,590-28
10 Sept 2026, 07:382,618-33
5 Sept 2026, 03:172,651+14
1 Sept 2026, 14:082,637-19
29 Aug 2026, 05:342,656-23
26 Aug 2026, 00:442,679-35
22 Aug 2026, 16:442,714-27
19 Aug 2026, 14:022,741-4
16 Aug 2026, 21:252,745-28
13 Aug 2026, 08:332,773-5
10 Aug 2026, 14:522,778-7
7 Aug 2026, 16:382,785-1
7 Aug 2026, 00:302,786no change
7 Aug 2026, 00:202,786first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 25 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

578 reactions across 20 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 41.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
23841.2%
💯15727.2%
👍8715.1%
😁356.06%
🤬295.02%
🔥142.42%
😢91.56%
🤣61.04%
👎20.346%
🤡10.173%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 578 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 25 July 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

5 Aug 2026, 19:45 UTC826 views40 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Хороший кубковый матч вышел Для штаба на старте сезона важно посмотреть на разные сочетания Мне понравились 3-5-2 во втором тайме. Особенно тройка Педро-Соболеа-Аугусто. Как классно малыш издевательски убегал и создавал моменты. Приятно смотреть за ним. Только вот Аугусто исполнил лучшие годы Азмуна. Сегодня 3 прекрасных момента не реализовал. Но в любом случае отметим, что эти моменты есть и Фелипе носится все 9

👍355

5 Aug 2026, 18:57 UTC897 views29 reactionsread 7 August 2026

А как оценим локоть по Кондакову? Даже желтой не вижу, сам виноват что ли? Пол лица опухло и разбито, у арбитра 0 эмоций

🤬29

5 Aug 2026, 18:49 UTC935 views48 reactionsread 7 August 2026

И кстати, все каналы СБГ. Пожалуйста, давайте пару недель про Энрике либо хорошо, либо никак Вдруг в Бразилии зайдут почитать. Поэтому по матчу пока «Пантера красавчик», чуть чуть не везет с мячом.

💯21😁18🤣62👍1

5 Aug 2026, 18:46 UTC899 views10 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Типичный кубковый матч, ничего нового Кстати в кубках у Зенита все хорошо с стандартами, спасают. Да и правило бывших сработало. Андраде пока нравится. Но и схема похожа на 3-4-3, о которой я писал еще на предсезонке, как опция. Смотрится неплохо на мой взгляд Богдану собраться. Пока есть неуверенность, надо справляться.

10

5 Aug 2026, 17:36 UTC929 views13 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Впн не дает публиковать пост с фото… Но думаю состав уже все видели. Сегодня день крайних защитников: Караваев, Вега, Сантос, а еще Дркушич и Алип там были Но вероятно Дркушич в центре, Алип на своем месте ЛЦЗ. Вега справа в атаке. Обойма в центре конечно «впечатляет», нужна покупка. Еще и авторитетная тетя говорит что Фламенго готовит 30+5 за Энрике. Когда бразильцы пишут про бонусы, это почти всегда молоко. Инте

👍85

3 Aug 2026, 17:00 UTC≈1,090 views40 reactionsread 7 August 2026

А если серьезно, видимо Анар решил под агентами посидеть. Заметьте, как вкинули новость по Адамову, после его супер матча Теперь после хет-трика Оренбургу появляется такой «вброс» про Глушенкова. А чего после Акрона то не было новостей? Выводы легко складываются. Репутация дело серьезное, так факапить нужно конечно постараться UPD: Подтянулся к этой инфе и Карп. Нужно спасать неопытного Анара агентские посты вкид

💯34👍51

3 Aug 2026, 16:44 UTC≈1,040 views24 reactionsread 7 August 2026

По моей информации, могут и не уйти Наблюдаем! Прямо сейчас ситуация 50 на 50…

😁168

2 Aug 2026, 15:03 UTC≈1,300 views44 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Уверенно начинаем два гостевых матча в чемпионате с общим счетом 8:0 Давненько так не было, а после матча за Суперкубок вдвойне приятно Теперь главное дома сыграть на максимум и начинать набирать отрыв, пока многие команды на старте хандрят

28👍10💯6

2 Aug 2026, 14:34 UTC≈1,090 views40 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Шикарный матч Макса и в целом команды Оказывается можно выпускать супер атакующие фланги: Джон-Вега, Глуш-Мантуан и играть на ноль Можно бить из-за штрафной и забивать. При этом конечно хочется написать, это уровень Акрона и Оренбурга. Но во первых это гостевые матчи, в которых у нас часто проблемы. А во вторых Акрон и Оренбург это команды, которые в прошлом году забирали у нас очки. В матчах, где мы осторожно иг

25💯10👍5

2 Aug 2026, 14:24 UTC≈1,000 views30 reactionsread 7 August 2026

В этом весь Глушенков Может из ничего сделать гол, но так это нестабильно. Но точно уже видно, что установка бить из-за пределов штрафной есть и игроки при удобном случае - бьют При этом конечно Татаев в Оренбурге вообще никакой и каждый момент с Соболевым проигрывает.

22💯8

2 Aug 2026, 14:08 UTC≈1,010 views10 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Возвращение Дугласа Сантоса во втором тайме посмотрим Хоть я и отметил Вегу, но с точки зрения контроля мяча при выходе из оборону и в целом структуры бразилец намного надежен. Поэтому с точки зрения конкуренции вопросов нет

10

2 Aug 2026, 14:02 UTC≈1,070 views39 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Посмотрел сейчас в перерыве удар прямой ногой по Барриосу как такое можно игнорировать? это же ужас

💯39

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @journalsbg. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Кафешка
@zenit_cafe · 25,511
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 14 September 2026
Зимин
@footballDiZzz · 24,250
Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 16 September 2026
#вЗените
@vzenite12 · 22,799
Telegram ranks this channel #65 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 19 September 2026

This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“СБГ | Журнал (Зенит, новости, слухи)” (@journalsbg), 2,552 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/journalsbg.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.