Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for японская развязность

Channel

японская развязность

@jpnswgg

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

100subscribers

-2 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002027282148
TypeChannel
Username@jpnswgg
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 September 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 10 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/jpnswgg

Growth

1001021019 August 2026 — 102 subscribers10 August 2026 — 102 subscribers1 September 2026 — 100 subscribers9 August 20261 September 2026
3 measurements spanning 22 days, net -2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 100–102 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
1 Sept 2026, 00:07100-2
10 Aug 2026, 13:16102no change
9 Aug 2026, 21:16102first reading

Engagement

17 posts held, back to 26 March 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 8 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
21s
Average length
21s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

41 reactions across 15 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 82.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 53731819504816782873482.9%
🤮717.1%

Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 41 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 26 March 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
2
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 16 we hold a reading for · 13%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @jpnswgg. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 17 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 26 March 2026 to 8 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

8 Aug 2026, 17:07 UTC30 views1 reactionsread 9 August 2026

по поводу коммента данька по поводу дэнса супер мастер сводила почему мне должно быть не похуй когда чел считает себя ебучим сводилой у которого 3к в тгк продает сведение и ебливые курсы в добавок наебывает сука на 700р типов а сам пост по поводу всех типов которые снимают никому нахуй не нужный пресет в стиле мэдкида который и так уже все поняли секрет вам дам если хотите в стиле мэдкида писать 1. берете бит чит

custom 53731819504816782871

8 Aug 2026, 16:46 UTC32 views1 reactionsread 9 August 2026

еще 8 раз прошу сделай ну повтори сведение в стиле мэдкид

custom 53731819504816782871

2 Aug 2026, 16:35 UTC125 views5 reactionsread 9 August 2026

кунилингус такое слово дебильное, ни одному человеку не нравится его произносить, вот назывался бы этот процесс Суперфлекс, так на свете бы ни одной пизды невылизанной не осталось

custom 53731819504816782874🤮1

31 Jul 2026, 17:12 UTC88 views1 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

с женой типа бля геймим

custom 53731819504816782871

29 Jul 2026, 18:21 UTC107 views1 reactionsread 9 August 2026

странно но я не вижу найнмайса

custom 53731819504816782871

29 Jul 2026, 18:20 UTC97 views1 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @trulyhumbleundergo8dPhoto

эйоу кто заказывал андерграунда? 🅰️🅰️🅰️🅰️🅰️🅰️🅰️🅰️ 🅰️🅰️🅰️🅰️ - это новый фест с самыми стильными артистами из российской андерграунд сцены на нашем мероприятии вас ждут: •🧋бесплатный напиток при входе на баре •💲скидка 30% при приглашении с собой 2х и более друзей •📻диджей сет от ребят из ГУЧИГЕНГОВО •🪩4 часа топовых выступлений ЖДЕМ ВСЕХ 📆7 АВГУСТА 📍ЛЕНИНГРАДСКИЙ ПРОСПЕКТ 7с1 🚮FC 16+ 🌿18:00-22:00 🎫БИЛЕТЫ 🎫БИ

custom 53731819504816782871

9 Jul 2026, 21:52 UTC471 views2 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

prod. @tiresp слушать

custom 53731819504816782872

3 Jul 2026, 04:32 UTC234 views3 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @emeraldchaostgPhoto

emeraldchaos-летать(2026) заранее прошу прощения, что никак не раскачивал песню, но надеюсь она не пройдет мимо вас :) надеюсь вы все прочувствуете летний вайб, который я в нее заложил. всем любви<3 фром эмеральд виз лав СЛУШАТЬ НА ВСЕХ ПЛОЩАДКАХ

custom 53731819504816782873

22 Jun 2026, 17:55 UTC483 views6 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Video

shot. by @eoeow12 direct. by @vestomirage

🤮4custom 53731819504816782872

19 Jun 2026, 07:06 UTC249 views2 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @emeraldchaostgPhoto

emeraldchaos "собака"(2026) СЛУШАТЬ

custom 53731819504816782872

11 Jun 2026, 13:07 UTC318 views2 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

custom 53731819504816782872

Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @jpnswgg. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 1 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“японская развязность” (@jpnswgg), 100 subscribers as measured 1 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/jpnswgg.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.