▶️ '兆단위 큰 장' 1기 신도시 재건축 수주전 막 올랐다 https://www.sedaily.com/article/20109243 #부동산, #도시정비, #재건축, #재개발, #신도시, #1기신도시

Channel
대체투자 인사이드
@jsinside
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
5,849subscribers
-26 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001417889048 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @jsinside |
| Created | 1 January 2020 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 4 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 23 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 4 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/jsinside |
Topic
Real estate — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 65% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 4 Nov 2026, 17:15 | 5,849 | -1 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 18:18 | 5,850 | -2 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 14:16 | 5,852 | -7 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 17:27 | 5,859 | +1 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 02:18 | 5,858 | -4 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 02:08 | 5,862 | +2 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 16:59 | 5,860 | -1 |
| 14 Oct 2026, 22:36 | 5,861 | -6 |
| 12 Oct 2026, 01:38 | 5,867 | -3 |
| 27 Sept 2026, 14:17 | 5,870 | +1 |
| 18 Sept 2026, 13:59 | 5,869 | -4 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 15:17 | 5,873 | -6 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 06:57 | 5,879 | -3 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 08:45 | 5,882 | -5 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 04:23 | 5,887 | -1 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 07:16 | 5,888 | +3 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 00:43 | 5,885 | +1 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 06:52 | 5,884 | +3 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 16:06 | 5,881 | +6 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 20:31 | 5,875 | first reading |
Engagement
71 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 10 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 6.45%
- avg views ÷ 5,849 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 377
- 20 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 20
- of 71 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 71 (3 August 2026 – 3 November 2026) |
| Views total | 7,549 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 4 Nov 2026, 16:05 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 20 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
▶️ 서울 아파트값 상승폭 둔화, 강남·서초 12주째 하락, 안정화 시작되나 https://www.news1.kr/realestate/general/6339063 #부동산, #부동산가격
[10·15대책 1년] ▶️ ① 집값, 더 올랐다 https://news.bizwatch.co.kr/article/real_estate/2026/10/14/0031 ▶️ ② 공급도 규제도 '믿을 수 있나' https://news.bizwatch.co.kr/article/real_estate/2026/10/15/0021 ▶️ ③ 부작용 간과할 수 있나 https://news.bizwatch.co.kr/article/real_estate/2026/10/17/0001 #부동산, #부동산정책, #부동산가격, #부동산공급
[공급의 역설] ▶️ ① 공급대책 쏟아냈는데, 집은 왜 부족할까 https://www.newsis.com/view/NISX20261016_0003829067 ▶️ ② 부동산 PF 61조 순유출, 중소 건설사 공급 기반 흔들 https://www.newsis.com/view/NISX20261016_0003829694 ▶️ ③ "공급 물량 늘려도 서울엔 땅 없다, 정비사업 규제 완화 불가피" https://www.newsis.com/view/NISX20261016_0003829588 #부동산, #부동산공급
[부동산 정책, 문제는 공급이다] ▶️ 작년 준공 절벽, 1000세대 대단지 42개 증발 https://www.munhwa.com/article/11620548 ▶️ "6800가구 들어서면 아예 주차장 돼" 태릉 지금도 교통지옥 https://www.munhwa.com/article/11620475 ▶️ 빈땅 없는 서울, 재개발이 답인데, 공급비중 84%→52% 확 준다 https://www.munhwa.com/article/11621927 ▶️ 마포 1164세대 전세 달랑 '2', 강남집값 꺾였지만 세입자 고통 https://www.munhwa.com/article/11623111 ▶️ "3기 신도시 용적률 높여 주택 저렴하게 공급, 과도한 토허제 풀고, 오피스텔 주택수 제외를" https://www.munhwa.com/articl…
▶️ 부동산 세제개편 국회 심사, 비거주 1주택자 보호 범위 쟁점 https://www.newsis.com/photo/graview/?id=NISI20261102_0002279924&cid=photo&page=1 #부동산, #부동산정책, #세금
▶️ 증권시장 결제주기 단축 계획 https://www.yna.co.kr/view/GYH20261102000500044?section=graphic/index #투자, #주식
▶️ '품귀'에 몸값 뛰는 아파트 전세, 서울 매매가보다 더 올랐다 https://www.fnnews.com/news/202611011856071100 #부동산, #부동산가격, #전세
▶️ 3기 신도시, 서울 주택 수요 흡수 입증, 청약자 10명 중 4명 서울 거주 https://www.kyeonggi.com/article/20261101580086 #부동산, #청약, #신도시, #3기신도시
▶️ 2030 생애 첫집 마련, 경기 남부에 몰렸다, 수원 영통구 1위 https://www.kmib.co.kr/article/20261101501323 #부동산, #부동산매매
▶️ 집값 상승 기대심리, 고점은 7월이었다? https://news.bizwatch.co.kr/article/real_estate/2026/10/30/0053 #부동산, #부동산가격, #전세
[싫거주] ▶️ ① 빌라는 주임사로, 아파트는 경매 '구멍' https://news.bizwatch.co.kr/article/real_estate/2026/10/01/0001 ▶️ ② '올파포'의 1년 전세, '혼돈의 카오스' https://news.bizwatch.co.kr/article/real_estate/2026/10/08/0002 ▶️ ③ 우리집은 '똘똘? 덜 똘? 띨띨?' https://news.bizwatch.co.kr/article/real_estate/2026/10/08/0049 ▶️ ④ 살라더니 배상하라고, '누더기' 규제의 그림자 https://news.bizwatch.co.kr/article/real_estate/2026/10/14/0007 #부동산, #부동산정책, #전세, #빌라, #부동산경매
Showing the 12 most recent of 71 posts we hold for @jsinside. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“대체투자 인사이드” (@jsinside), 5,849 subscribers as measured 4 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/jsinside.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.