Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Юлик | Геймдев | S-Grade Games

Channel

Юлик | Геймдев | S-Grade Games

@jul_gd

On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

11,096subscribers

-108 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002096676187
TypeChannel
Username@jul_gd
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live9 September 2026
Measurements held28
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 9 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/jul_gd

Topic

Gaming — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 15 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 96% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Views per post sit far above this size band

11,400 average views per post against 11,096 subscribers — an engagement rate of 102.4%. Across the 23,970 registered channels in the same cohort — 10,000–31,620 subscribers, posting mainly in Russian — the middle half sit between 5.47% and 21.7%, with a median of 11.1%.

What this was computed from
Window30 days (11 August 2026 10 September 2026)
Posts measured18 of 18 published in the window (1 exact, 17 rounded by Telegram)
Views totalled204,455
Mature posts only114.0% over 16 posts read at least 24h after publication
Subscribers11,096 measured 9 September 2026
Cohortb10000:rus · 23,970 channels · p10 2.81% · p25 5.47% · p50 11.1% · p75 21.7% · p90 39.0%
Position in cohort99.441th percentile · 9.2× the cohort median
Uncertainty±0.262% of the figure, from Telegram’s rounding
Post languageRussian · 100.0% of the window’s posts

When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or above the 99th percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — above it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.

This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal. A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.

Recorded under the key err_high, last confirmed 10 September 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Growth

11,09611,20511,150.56 August 2026 — 11,204 subscribers6 August 2026 — 11,205 subscribers7 August 2026 — 11,200 subscribers8 August 2026 — 11,198 subscribers9 August 2026 — 11,192 subscribers10 August 2026 — 11,189 subscribers11 August 2026 — 11,184 subscribers12 August 2026 — 11,182 subscribers13 August 2026 — 11,178 subscribers14 August 2026 — 11,173 subscribers16 August 2026 — 11,178 subscribers18 August 2026 — 11,175 subscribers19 August 2026 — 11,172 subscribers20 August 2026 — 11,165 subscribers22 August 2026 — 11,162 subscribers23 August 2026 — 11,157 subscribers25 August 2026 — 11,154 subscribers26 August 2026 — 11,151 subscribers27 August 2026 — 11,149 subscribers28 August 2026 — 11,146 subscribers29 August 2026 — 11,143 subscribers29 August 2026 — 11,145 subscribers30 August 2026 — 11,142 subscribers1 September 2026 — 11,137 subscribers2 September 2026 — 11,127 subscribers4 September 2026 — 11,120 subscribers6 September 2026 — 11,117 subscribers9 September 2026 — 11,096 subscribers6 August 20269 September 2026
28 measurements spanning 35 days, net -108. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 11,080–11,221 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 28
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Sept 2026, 22:2011,096-21
6 Sept 2026, 15:1811,117-3
4 Sept 2026, 02:3811,120-7
2 Sept 2026, 20:1811,127-10
1 Sept 2026, 16:1611,137-5
30 Aug 2026, 19:5411,142-3
29 Aug 2026, 21:0411,145+2
29 Aug 2026, 00:0411,143-3
28 Aug 2026, 00:3211,146-3
27 Aug 2026, 03:1811,149-2
26 Aug 2026, 04:0211,151-3
25 Aug 2026, 02:3711,154-3
23 Aug 2026, 17:1411,157-5
22 Aug 2026, 00:2511,162-3
20 Aug 2026, 15:1711,165-7
19 Aug 2026, 15:4511,172-3
18 Aug 2026, 15:5311,175-3
16 Aug 2026, 08:4511,178+5
14 Aug 2026, 22:1411,173-5
13 Aug 2026, 12:0511,178first reading

Engagement

41 posts held, back to 26 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 42 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
102.4%
avg views ÷ 11,096 subscribers
Avg views / post
11,400
18 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.332%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
18
of 41 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026
Posts held41 (26 July 20262 September 2026)
Views total204,455
Reactions total679
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken3 Sept 2026, 01:57 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
10m 56s
Average length
23s

Measured directly from 28 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

1,839 reactions across 40 posts, in 25 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 42.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥78542.7%
45124.5%
👍1447.83%
😁1437.78%
💩1025.55%
❤‍🔥382.07%
🤩361.96%
🤮191.03%
💘170.924%
🤣170.924%
🤡150.816%
😨140.761%
😭110.598%
🙏100.544%
🏆70.381%
🍓50.272%
😍50.272%
💊40.218%
🤯40.218%
🍌30.163%
5 further kinds90.489%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 41 of the 41 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,865 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 41 most recent posts we hold, published 26 July 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

2 Sept 2026, 22:08 UTC425 views15 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Забавный баг В игре есть контейнеры, которые можно открыть, поучаствовав в аукционе. Чтоб игрок не тупил, копя всё в контейнерах, я сделал так, чтоб они очищались каждое утро - в контейнере есть зона, которая перекрывает всю его внутренность и любой 3д объект с коллизией, находящийся в ней, будет удалён. Двери подходят под это условие и удалялись первым же утром, так как зона слегка их перекрывала. Добавить Picker

😁113💘1

2 Sept 2026, 13:18 UTC≈1,710 views69 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

DLSS 5 ON 😎 Добавляй Garaji в желаемое

37🤣12🔥7😍5🤮3💩2😱2💊1

2 Sept 2026, 01:52 UTC≈9,570 views60 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video

Новый вражеский нпс Будет накладывать эффект, при котором персонажи игрока атакуют друг друга, вместо врагов Добавляй Garaji в желаемое

👍26🔥168💩4🤡2🤮2🤣1😁1

1 Sept 2026, 21:26 UTC≈1,790 views17 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video

Меню экипировки и статуса (распределение статов, прокачка навыков) Предметы имеют ограничение по классу Добавляй Garaji в желаемое

11🔥4👍1💩1

28 Aug 2026, 21:40 UTC≈25,200 views47 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video

Весь день смотрю записи плейтестов и правлю баги в picker magnate Это скучно, поэтому сделал такое: автобус ломает к херам все предметы на своём пути Добавить Picker Magnate Simulator в желаемое

🔥34👍73💩1🤡1🤮1

27 Aug 2026, 02:08 UTC≈2,980 views35 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video

Окно экипировки Добавляй Garaji в желаемое

🔥2011👍3💩1

24 Aug 2026, 18:28 UTC≈3,340 views33 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video

Демонстрация умения "провокация" Враги атакуют только провоцирующего персонажа Добавляй Garaji в желаемое

❤‍🔥177🔥6💩2🤣1

24 Aug 2026, 01:54 UTC≈36,200 views33 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video

Написал систему интерактивных вещей на карте, это может быть что угодно - сундуки, диалоги, опыт В видео пример с открытием "сундуков", роль которых выполняют машины. Для успешного взаимодействия нужно проходить порог определенного стата, проверка идёт у выбранного вами участника группы. Если проверка пройдена - взаимодействие подтверждается и происходит. Если не пройдена, то счетчик до случайного столкновения с вр

🔥235👍3💩2

23 Aug 2026, 21:39 UTC≈2,860 views38 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Потихоньку добавляю квесты Тестирую сохранения/загрузку, последними были грядки Нужны тестеры, пишите в @sgradebot Аккаунт закрытым держать не нужно, по возможности напишите о себе и компе как можно больше

🔥17💩86👍4🤡2💊1

22 Aug 2026, 01:41 UTC≈2,880 views32 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video

Работающий магазин Ассортимент будет расширяться после продажи найденного лута Добавляй Garaji в желаемое

🔥20👍5💩43

20 Aug 2026, 00:36 UTC≈3,270 views36 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video

Визуальные эффекты разных действий Добавляй Garaji в желаемое

16🔥9💩7👍3🤮1

19 Aug 2026, 20:45 UTC≈3,220 views23 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video

Квест с поиском анаболиков Добавить Picker Magnate Simulator в желаемое

13💩5👍2🔥2🤮1

Showing the 12 most recent of 41 posts we hold for @jul_gd. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Юлик
@juliusspeak · 112,336
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 14 August 2026
Нежные стримы Кузьмы
@kuzmastream · 34,121
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 57 here — alongside 56 others — read 3 September 2026
Anton Vlasov
@TrudovoyDrive · 58,311
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 22 August 2026

This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Юлик | Геймдев | S-Grade Games” (@jul_gd), 11,096 subscribers as measured 9 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/jul_gd.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.